10. Foreign function interface (FFI)¶
-
ForeignFunctionInterface
¶ Since: 6.8.1 Allow use of the Haskell foreign function interface.
GHC (mostly) conforms to the Haskell Foreign Function Interface, whose definition is part of the Haskell Report on http://www.haskell.org/.
FFI support is enabled by default, but can be enabled or disabled
explicitly with the ForeignFunctionInterface
flag.
GHC implements a number of GHC-specific extensions to the FFI Chapter of the Haskell 2010 Report. These extensions are described in GHC extensions to the FFI Chapter, but please note that programs using these features are not portable. Hence, these features should be avoided where possible.
The FFI libraries are documented in the accompanying library documentation; see for example the Foreign module.
10.1. GHC differences to the FFI Chapter¶
10.1.1. Guaranteed call safety¶
The Haskell 2010 Report specifies that safe
FFI calls must allow foreign
calls to safely call into Haskell code. In practice, this means that the
garbage collector must be able to run while these calls are in progress,
moving heap-allocated Haskell values around arbitrarily.
This greatly constrains library authors since it implies that it is not safe to
pass any heap object reference to a safe
foreign function call. For
instance, it is often desirable to pass an unpinned ByteArray#
s directly
to native code to avoid making an otherwise-unnecessary copy. However, this can
only be done safely if the array is guaranteed not to be moved by the garbage
collector in the middle of the call.
The Chapter does not require implementations to refrain from doing the
same for unsafe
calls, so strictly Haskell 2010-conforming programs
cannot pass heap-allocated references to unsafe
FFI calls either.
In previous releases, GHC would take advantage of the freedom afforded by the
Chapter by performing safe
foreign calls in place of unsafe
calls in
the bytecode interpreter. This meant that some packages which worked when
compiled would fail under GHCi (e.g. Trac #13730).
However, since version 8.4 this is no longer the case: GHC guarantees that
garbage collection will never occur during an unsafe
call, even in the
bytecode interpreter, and further guarantees that unsafe
calls will be
performed in the calling thread.
10.2. GHC extensions to the FFI Chapter¶
The FFI features that are described in this section are specific to GHC. Your code will not be portable to other compilers if you use them.
10.2.1. Unboxed types¶
The following unboxed types may be used as basic foreign types (see FFI
Chapter, Section 8.6): Int#
, Word#
, Char#
, Float#
,
Double#
, Addr#
, StablePtr# a
, MutableByteArray#
,
ForeignObj#
, and ByteArray#
.
10.2.2. Newtype wrapping of the IO monad¶
The FFI spec requires the IO monad to appear in various places, but it
can sometimes be convenient to wrap the IO monad in a newtype
, thus:
newtype MyIO a = MIO (IO a)
(A reason for doing so might be to prevent the programmer from calling arbitrary IO procedures in some part of the program.)
The Haskell FFI already specifies that arguments and results of foreign
imports and exports will be automatically unwrapped if they are newtypes
(Section 3.2 of the FFI addendum). GHC extends the FFI by automatically
unwrapping any newtypes that wrap the IO monad itself. More precisely,
wherever the FFI specification requires an IO
type, GHC will accept any
newtype-wrapping of an IO
type. For example, these declarations are
OK:
foreign import foo :: Int -> MyIO Int
foreign import "dynamic" baz :: (Int -> MyIO Int) -> CInt -> MyIO Int
10.2.3. Primitive imports¶
GHC extends the FFI with an additional calling convention prim
,
e.g.:
foreign import prim "foo" foo :: ByteArray# -> (# Int#, Int# #)
This is used to import functions written in Cmm code that follow an
internal GHC calling convention. The arguments and results must be
unboxed types, except that an argument may be of type Any
(by way of
unsafeCoerce#
) and the result type is allowed to be an unboxed tuple
or the type Any
.
This feature is not intended for use outside of the core libraries that come with GHC. For more details see the GHC developer wiki.
10.2.4. Interruptible foreign calls¶
-
InterruptibleFFI
¶ Since: 7.2.1
This concerns the interaction of foreign calls with
Control.Concurrent.throwTo
. Normally when the target of a
throwTo
is involved in a foreign call, the exception is not raised
until the call returns, and in the meantime the caller is blocked. This
can result in unresponsiveness, which is particularly undesirable in the
case of user interrupt (e.g. Control-C). The default behaviour when a
Control-C signal is received (SIGINT
on Unix) is to raise the
UserInterrupt
exception in the main thread; if the main thread is
blocked in a foreign call at the time, then the program will not respond
to the user interrupt.
The problem is that it is not possible in general to interrupt a foreign
call safely. However, GHC does provide a way to interrupt blocking
system calls which works for most system calls on both Unix and Windows.
When the InterruptibleFFI
extension is enabled, a foreign call can
be annotated with interruptible
instead of safe
or unsafe
:
foreign import ccall interruptible
"sleep" sleepBlock :: CUint -> IO CUint
interruptible
behaves exactly as safe
, except that when a
throwTo
is directed at a thread in an interruptible foreign call, an
OS-specific mechanism will be used to attempt to cause the foreign call
to return:
- Unix systems
- The thread making the foreign call is sent a
SIGPIPE
signal usingpthread_kill()
. This is usually enough to cause a blocking system call to return withEINTR
(GHC by default installs an empty signal handler forSIGPIPE
, to override the default behaviour which is to terminate the process immediately). - Windows systems
- [Vista and later only] The RTS calls the Win32 function
CancelSynchronousIo
, which will cause a blocking I/O operation to return with the errorERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED
.
If the system call is successfully interrupted, it will return to
Haskell whereupon the exception can be raised. Be especially careful
when using interruptible
that the caller of the foreign function is
prepared to deal with the consequences of the call being interrupted; on
Unix it is good practice to check for EINTR
always, but on Windows
it is not typically necessary to handle ERROR_OPERATION_ABORTED
.
10.2.5. The CAPI calling convention¶
-
CApiFFI
¶ Since: 7.10.1
The CApiFFI
extension allows a calling convention of capi
to be
used in foreign declarations, e.g.
foreign import capi "header.h f" f :: CInt -> IO CInt
Rather than generating code to call f
according to the platform’s
ABI, we instead call f
using the C API defined in the header
header.h
. Thus f
can be called even if it may be defined as a
CPP #define
rather than a proper function.
When using capi
, it is also possible to import values, rather than
functions. For example,
foreign import capi "pi.h value pi" c_pi :: CDouble
will work regardless of whether pi
is defined as
const double pi = 3.14;
or with
#define pi 3.14
In order to tell GHC the C type that a Haskell type corresponds to when
it is used with the CAPI, a CTYPE
pragma can be used on the type
definition. The header which defines the type can optionally also be
specified. The syntax looks like:
data {-# CTYPE "unistd.h" "useconds_t" #-} T = ...
newtype {-# CTYPE "useconds_t" #-} T = ...
10.2.6. hs_thread_done()
¶
void hs_thread_done(void);
GHC allocates a small amount of thread-local memory when a thread calls
a Haskell function via a foreign export
. This memory is not normally
freed until hs_exit()
; the memory is cached so that subsequent calls
into Haskell are fast. However, if your application is long-running and
repeatedly creates new threads that call into Haskell, you probably want
to arrange that this memory is freed in those threads that have finished
calling Haskell functions. To do this, call hs_thread_done()
from
the thread whose memory you want to free.
Calling hs_thread_done()
is entirely optional. You can call it as
often or as little as you like. It is safe to call it from a thread that
has never called any Haskell functions, or one that never will. If you
forget to call it, the worst that can happen is that some memory remains
allocated until hs_exit()
is called. If you call it too often, the
worst that can happen is that the next call to a Haskell function incurs
some extra overhead.
10.2.7. Freeing many stable pointers efficiently¶
The standard function hs_free_stable_ptr
locks the stable pointer
table, frees the given stable pointer, and then unlocks the stable pointer
table again. When freeing many stable pointers at once, it is usually
more efficient to lock and unlock the table only once.
extern void hs_lock_stable_ptr_table (void);
extern void hs_unlock_stable_ptr_table (void);
extern void hs_free_stable_ptr_unsafe (HsStablePtr sp);
hs_free_stable_ptr_unsafe
must be used only when the table has been
locked using hs_lock_stable_ptr_table
. It must be unlocked afterwards
using hs_unlock_stable_ptr_table
. The Haskell garbage collector cannot
run while the table is locked, so it should be unlocked promptly. The
following operations are forbidden while the stable pointer table is locked:
- Calling any Haskell function, whether or not that function manipulates stable pointers.
- Calling any FFI function that deals with the stable pointer table
except for arbitrarily many calls to
hs_free_stable_ptr_unsafe
and the final call tohs_unlock_stable_ptr_table
. - Calling
hs_free_fun_ptr
.
Note
GHC versions before 8.8 defined undocumented functions
hs_lock_stable_tables
and hs_unlock_stable_tables
instead
of hs_lock_stable_ptr_table
and hs_unlock_stable_ptr_table
.
Those names are now deprecated.
10.3. Using the FFI with GHC¶
The following sections also give some hints and tips on the use of the foreign function interface in GHC.
10.3.1. Using foreign export
and foreign import ccall "wrapper"
with GHC¶
When GHC compiles a module (say M.hs
) which uses foreign export
or foreign import "wrapper"
, it generates a M_stub.h
for use by
C programs.
For a plain foreign export
, the file M_stub.h
contains a C
prototype for the foreign exported function. For example, if we compile
the following module:
module Foo where
foreign export ccall foo :: Int -> IO Int
foo :: Int -> IO Int
foo n = return (length (f n))
f :: Int -> [Int]
f 0 = []
f n = n:(f (n-1))
Then Foo_stub.h
will contain something like this:
#include "HsFFI.h"
extern HsInt foo(HsInt a0);
To invoke foo()
from C, just #include "Foo_stub.h"
and call
foo()
.
The Foo_stub.h
file can be redirected using the -stubdir
option;
see Redirecting the compilation output(s).
10.3.1.1. Using your own main()
¶
Normally, GHC’s runtime system provides a main()
, which arranges to
invoke Main.main
in the Haskell program. However, you might want to
link some Haskell code into a program which has a main function written
in another language, say C. In order to do this, you have to initialize
the Haskell runtime system explicitly.
Let’s take the example from above, and invoke it from a standalone C program. Here’s the C code:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "HsFFI.h"
#ifdef __GLASGOW_HASKELL__
#include "Foo_stub.h"
#endif
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i;
hs_init(&argc, &argv);
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
printf("%d\n", foo(2500));
}
hs_exit();
return 0;
}
We’ve surrounded the GHC-specific bits with
#ifdef __GLASGOW_HASKELL__
; the rest of the code should be portable
across Haskell implementations that support the FFI standard.
The call to hs_init()
initializes GHC’s runtime system. Do NOT try
to invoke any Haskell functions before calling hs_init()
: bad things
will undoubtedly happen.
We pass references to argc
and argv
to hs_init()
so that it
can separate out any arguments for the RTS (i.e. those arguments between
+RTS...-RTS
).
After we’ve finished invoking our Haskell functions, we can call
hs_exit()
, which terminates the RTS.
There can be multiple calls to hs_init()
, but each one should be matched by
one (and only one) call to hs_exit()
. The outermost hs_exit()
will
actually de-initialise the system. Note that currently GHC’s runtime cannot
reliably re-initialise after this has happened; see The Foreign Function Interface.
Note
When linking the final program, it is normally easiest to do the
link using GHC, although this isn’t essential. If you do use GHC, then
don’t forget the flag -no-hs-main
, otherwise GHC
will try to link to the Main
Haskell module.
Note
On Windows hs_init treats argv as UTF8-encoded. Passing other encodings might lead to unexpected results. Passing NULL as argv is valid but can lead to <unknown> showing up in error messages instead of the name of the executable.
To use +RTS
flags with hs_init()
, we have to modify the example
slightly. By default, GHC’s RTS will only accept “safe” +RTS
flags (see
Options affecting linking), and the -rtsopts[=⟨none|some|all⟩]
link-time flag overrides this. However, -rtsopts[=⟨none|some|all⟩]
has no effect when -no-hs-main
is in use (and the same goes for
-with-rtsopts=⟨opts⟩
). To set these options we have to call a
GHC-specific API instead of hs_init()
:
#include <stdio.h>
#include "HsFFI.h"
#ifdef __GLASGOW_HASKELL__
#include "Foo_stub.h"
#include "Rts.h"
#endif
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int i;
#if __GLASGOW_HASKELL__ >= 703
{
RtsConfig conf = defaultRtsConfig;
conf.rts_opts_enabled = RtsOptsAll;
hs_init_ghc(&argc, &argv, conf);
}
#else
hs_init(&argc, &argv);
#endif
for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
printf("%d\n", foo(2500));
}
hs_exit();
return 0;
}
Note two changes: we included Rts.h
, which defines the GHC-specific
external RTS interface, and we called hs_init_ghc()
instead of
hs_init()
, passing an argument of type RtsConfig
. RtsConfig
is a struct with various fields that affect the behaviour of the runtime
system. Its definition is:
typedef struct {
RtsOptsEnabledEnum rts_opts_enabled;
const char *rts_opts;
} RtsConfig;
extern const RtsConfig defaultRtsConfig;
typedef enum {
RtsOptsNone, // +RTS causes an error
RtsOptsSafeOnly, // safe RTS options allowed; others cause an error
RtsOptsAll // all RTS options allowed
} RtsOptsEnabledEnum;
There is a default value defaultRtsConfig
that should be used to
initialise variables of type RtsConfig
. More fields will undoubtedly
be added to RtsConfig
in the future, so in order to keep your code
forwards-compatible it is best to initialise with defaultRtsConfig
and then modify the required fields, as in the code sample above.
10.3.1.2. Making a Haskell library that can be called from foreign code¶
The scenario here is much like in Using your own main(), except that the aim is not to link a complete program, but to make a library from Haskell code that can be deployed in the same way that you would deploy a library of C code.
The main requirement here is that the runtime needs to be initialized before any Haskell code can be called, so your library should provide initialisation and deinitialisation entry points, implemented in C or C++. For example:
#include <stdlib.h>
#include "HsFFI.h"
HsBool mylib_init(void){
int argc = 2;
char *argv[] = { "+RTS", "-A32m", NULL };
char **pargv = argv;
// Initialize Haskell runtime
hs_init(&argc, &pargv);
// do any other initialization here and
// return false if there was a problem
return HS_BOOL_TRUE;
}
void mylib_end(void){
hs_exit();
}
The initialisation routine, mylib_init
, calls hs_init()
as
normal to initialise the Haskell runtime, and the corresponding
deinitialisation function mylib_end()
calls hs_exit()
to shut
down the runtime.
10.3.2. Using header files¶
C functions are normally declared using prototypes in a C header file.
Earlier versions of GHC (6.8.3 and earlier) #include
d the header
file in the C source file generated from the Haskell code, and the C
compiler could therefore check that the C function being called via the
FFI was being called at the right type.
GHC no longer includes external header files when compiling via C, so
this checking is not performed. The change was made for compatibility
with the native code generator (-fasm
) and to
comply strictly with the FFI specification, which requires that FFI calls are
not subject to macro expansion and other CPP conversions that may be applied
when using C header files. This approach also simplifies the inlining of foreign
calls across module and package boundaries: there’s no need for the header file
to be available when compiling an inlined version of a foreign call, so the
compiler is free to inline foreign calls in any context.
The -#include
option is now deprecated, and the include-files
field in a Cabal package specification is ignored.
10.3.3. Memory Allocation¶
The FFI libraries provide several ways to allocate memory for use with the FFI, and it isn’t always clear which way is the best. This decision may be affected by how efficient a particular kind of allocation is on a given compiler/platform, so this section aims to shed some light on how the different kinds of allocation perform with GHC.
alloca
Useful for short-term allocation when the allocation is intended to scope over a given
IO
computation. This kind of allocation is commonly used when marshalling data to and from FFI functions.In GHC,
alloca
is implemented usingMutableByteArray#
, so allocation and deallocation are fast: much faster than C’smalloc/free
, but not quite as fast as stack allocation in C. Usealloca
whenever you can.mallocForeignPtr
Useful for longer-term allocation which requires garbage collection. If you intend to store the pointer to the memory in a foreign data structure, then
mallocForeignPtr
is not a good choice, however.In GHC,
mallocForeignPtr
is also implemented usingMutableByteArray#
. Although the memory is pointed to by aForeignPtr
, there are no actual finalizers involved (unless you add one withaddForeignPtrFinalizer
), and the deallocation is done using GC, somallocForeignPtr
is normally very cheap.malloc/free
- If all else fails, then you need to resort to
Foreign.malloc
andForeign.free
. These are just wrappers around the C functions of the same name, and their efficiency will depend ultimately on the implementations of these functions in your platform’s C library. We usually findmalloc
andfree
to be significantly slower than the other forms of allocation above. Foreign.Marshal.Pool
- Pools are currently implemented using
malloc/free
, so while they might be a more convenient way to structure your memory allocation than using one of the other forms of allocation, they won’t be any more efficient. We do plan to provide an improved-performance implementation of Pools in the future, however.
10.3.4. Multi-threading and the FFI¶
In order to use the FFI in a multi-threaded setting, you must use the
-threaded
option (see Options affecting linking).
10.3.4.1. Foreign imports and multi-threading¶
When you call a foreign import
ed function that is annotated as
safe
(the default), and the program was linked using -threaded
,
then the call will run concurrently with other running Haskell threads.
If the program was linked without -threaded
, then the other Haskell
threads will be blocked until the call returns.
This means that if you need to make a foreign call to a function that
takes a long time or blocks indefinitely, then you should mark it
safe
and use -threaded
. Some library functions make such calls
internally; their documentation should indicate when this is the case.
If you are making foreign calls from multiple Haskell threads and using
-threaded
, make sure that the foreign code you are calling is
thread-safe. In particularly, some GUI libraries are not thread-safe and
require that the caller only invokes GUI methods from a single thread.
If this is the case, you may need to restrict your GUI operations to a
single Haskell thread, and possibly also use a bound thread (see
The relationship between Haskell threads and OS threads).
Note that foreign calls made by different Haskell threads may execute in
parallel, even when the +RTS -N
flag is not being used
(RTS options for SMP parallelism). The -N ⟨x⟩
flag controls parallel
execution of Haskell threads, but there may be an arbitrary number of
foreign calls in progress at any one time, regardless of the +RTS -N
value.
If a call is annotated as interruptible
and the program was
multithreaded, the call may be interrupted in the event that the Haskell
thread receives an exception. The mechanism by which the interrupt
occurs is platform dependent, but is intended to cause blocking system
calls to return immediately with an interrupted error code. The
underlying operating system thread is not to be destroyed. See
Interruptible foreign calls for more details.
10.3.4.2. The relationship between Haskell threads and OS threads¶
Normally there is no fixed relationship between Haskell threads and OS threads. This means that when you make a foreign call, that call may take place in an unspecified OS thread. Furthermore, there is no guarantee that multiple calls made by one Haskell thread will be made by the same OS thread.
This usually isn’t a problem, and it allows the GHC runtime system to make efficient use of OS thread resources. However, there are cases where it is useful to have more control over which OS thread is used, for example when calling foreign code that makes use of thread-local state. For cases like this, we provide bound threads, which are Haskell threads tied to a particular OS thread. For information on bound threads, see the documentation for the Control.Concurrent module.
10.3.4.3. Foreign exports and multi-threading¶
When the program is linked with -threaded
, then you may invoke
foreign export
ed functions from multiple OS threads concurrently.
The runtime system must be initialised as usual by calling
hs_init()
, and this call must complete before invoking any
foreign export
ed functions.
10.3.4.4. On the use of hs_exit()
¶
hs_exit()
normally causes the termination of any running Haskell
threads in the system, and when hs_exit()
returns, there will be no
more Haskell threads running. The runtime will then shut down the system
in an orderly way, generating profiling output and statistics if
necessary, and freeing all the memory it owns.
It isn’t always possible to terminate a Haskell thread forcibly: for
example, the thread might be currently executing a foreign call, and we
have no way to force the foreign call to complete. What’s more, the
runtime must assume that in the worst case the Haskell code and runtime
are about to be removed from memory (e.g. if this is a
Windows DLL, hs_exit()
is normally called before unloading
the DLL). So hs_exit()
must wait until all outstanding foreign
calls return before it can return itself.
The upshot of this is that if you have Haskell threads that are blocked
in foreign calls, then hs_exit()
may hang (or possibly busy-wait)
until the calls return. Therefore it’s a good idea to make sure you
don’t have any such threads in the system when calling hs_exit()
.
This includes any threads doing I/O, because I/O may (or may not,
depending on the type of I/O and the platform) be implemented using
blocking foreign calls.
The GHC runtime treats program exit as a special case, to avoid the need
to wait for blocked threads when a standalone executable exits. Since
the program and all its threads are about to terminate at the same time
that the code is removed from memory, it isn’t necessary to ensure that
the threads have exited first. If you want this fast and loose
version of hs_exit()
, you can call:
void hs_exit_nowait(void);
instead. This is particularly useful if you have foreign libraries
that need to call hs_exit()
at program exit (perhaps via a C++
destructor): in this case you should use hs_exit_nowait()
, because
the thread that called exit()
and is running C++ destructors is in
a foreign call from Haskell that will never return, so hs_exit()
would deadlock.
10.3.4.5. Waking up Haskell threads from C¶
Sometimes we want to be able to wake up a Haskell thread from some C code. For example, when using a callback-based C API, we register a C callback and then we need to wait for the callback to run.
One way to do this is to create a foreign export
that will do
whatever needs to be done to wake up the Haskell thread - perhaps
putMVar
- and then call this from our C callback. There are a
couple of problems with this:
- Calling a foreign export has a lot of overhead: it creates a complete new Haskell thread, for example.
- The call may block for a long time if a GC is in progress. We can’t use this method if the C API we’re calling doesn’t allow blocking in the callback.
For these reasons GHC provides an external API to tryPutMVar
,
hs_try_putmvar
, which you can use to cheaply and asynchronously
wake up a Haskell thread from C/C++.
void hs_try_putmvar (int capability, HsStablePtr sp);
The C call hs_try_putmvar(cap, mvar)
is equivalent to the Haskell
call tryPutMVar mvar ()
, except that it is
- non-blocking: takes a bounded, short, amount of time
- asynchronous: the actual putMVar may be performed after the call
returns (for example, if the RTS is currently garbage collecting).
That’s why
hs_try_putmvar()
doesn’t return a result to say whether the put succeeded. It is your responsibility to ensure that theMVar
is empty; if it is full,hs_try_putmvar()
will have no effect.
Example. Suppose we have a C/C++ function to call that will return and then invoke a callback at some point in the future, passing us some data. We want to wait in Haskell for the callback to be called, and retrieve the data. We can do it like this:
import GHC.Conc (newStablePtrPrimMVar, PrimMVar)
makeExternalCall = mask_ $ do
mvar <- newEmptyMVar
sp <- newStablePtrPrimMVar mvar
fp <- mallocForeignPtr
withForeignPtr fp $ \presult -> do
cap <- threadCapability =<< myThreadId
scheduleCallback sp cap presult
takeMVar mvar `onException`
forkIO (do takeMVar mvar; touchForeignPtr fp)
peek presult
foreign import ccall "scheduleCallback"
scheduleCallback :: StablePtr PrimMVar
-> Int
-> Ptr Result
-> IO ()
And inside scheduleCallback
, we create a callback that will in due
course store the result data in the Ptr Result
, and then call
hs_try_putmvar()
.
There are a few things to note here.
There’s a special function to create the
StablePtr
:newStablePtrPrimMVar
, because the RTS needs aStablePtr
to the primitiveMVar#
object, and we can’t create that directly. Do not just usenewStablePtr
on theMVar
: your program will crash.The
StablePtr
is freed byhs_try_putmvar()
. This is because it would otherwise be difficult to arrange to free theStablePtr
reliably: we can’t free it in Haskell, because if thetakeMVar
is interrupted by an asynchronous exception, then the callback will fire at a later time. We can’t free it in C, because we don’t know when to free it (not whenhs_try_putmvar()
returns, because that is an async call that uses theStablePtr
at some time in the future).The
mask_
is to avoid asynchronous exceptions before thescheduleCallback
call, which would leak theStablePtr
.We find out the current capability number and pass it to C. This is passed back to
hs_try_putmvar
, and helps the RTS to know which capability it should try to perform thetryPutMVar
on. If you don’t care, you can pass-1
for the capability tohs_try_putmvar
, and it will pick an arbitrary one.Picking the right capability will help avoid unnecessary context switches. Ideally you should pass the capability that the thread that will be woken up last ran on, which you can find by calling
threadCapability
in Haskell.If you want to also pass some data back from the C callback to Haskell, this is best done by first allocating some memory in Haskell to receive the data, and passing the address to C, as we did in the above example.
takeMVar
can be interrupted by an asynchronous exception. If this happens, the callback in C will still run at some point in the future, will still write the result, and will still callhs_try_putmvar()
. Therefore we have to arrange that the memory for the result stays alive until the callback has run, so if an exception is thrown duringtakeMVar
we fork another thread to wait for the callback and hold the memory alive usingtouchForeignPtr
.
For a fully working example, see
testsuite/tests/concurrent/should_run/hs_try_putmvar001.hs
in the
GHC source tree.
10.3.5. Floating point and the FFI¶
The standard C99 fenv.h
header provides operations for inspecting
and modifying the state of the floating point unit. In particular, the
rounding mode used by floating point operations can be changed, and the
exception flags can be tested.
In Haskell, floating-point operations have pure types, and the
evaluation order is unspecified. So strictly speaking, since the
fenv.h
functions let you change the results of, or observe the
effects of floating point operations, use of fenv.h
renders the
behaviour of floating-point operations anywhere in the program
undefined.
Having said that, we can document exactly what GHC does with respect
to the floating point state, so that if you really need to use
fenv.h
then you can do so with full knowledge of the pitfalls:
- GHC completely ignores the floating-point environment, the runtime neither modifies nor reads it.
- The floating-point environment is not saved over a normal thread
context-switch. So if you modify the floating-point state in one
thread, those changes may be visible in other threads. Furthermore,
testing the exception state is not reliable, because a context switch
may change it. If you need to modify or test the floating point state
and use threads, then you must use bound threads
(
Control.Concurrent.forkOS
), because a bound thread has its own OS thread, and OS threads do save and restore the floating-point state. - It is safe to modify the floating-point unit state temporarily during a foreign call, because foreign calls are never pre-empted by GHC.