{- (c) The University of Glasgow 2006 (c) The GRASP/AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1992-1998 -} {-# LANGUAGE CPP, DeriveFunctor, MultiWayIf, TupleSections, ScopedTypeVariables #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-incomplete-uni-patterns #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-incomplete-record-updates #-} -- | Type subsumption and unification module GHC.Tc.Utils.Unify ( -- Full-blown subsumption tcWrapResult, tcWrapResultO, tcWrapResultMono, tcSkolemise, tcSkolemiseScoped, tcSkolemiseET, tcSubType, tcSubTypeSigma, tcSubTypePat, tcSubMult, checkConstraints, checkTvConstraints, buildImplicationFor, buildTvImplication, emitResidualTvConstraint, -- Various unifications unifyType, unifyKind, uType, promoteTcType, swapOverTyVars, canSolveByUnification, -------------------------------- -- Holes tcInfer, matchExpectedListTy, matchExpectedTyConApp, matchExpectedAppTy, matchExpectedFunTys, matchActualFunTysRho, matchActualFunTySigma, matchExpectedFunKind, metaTyVarUpdateOK, occCheckForErrors, MetaTyVarUpdateResult(..) ) where #include "HsVersions.h" import GHC.Prelude import GHC.Hs import GHC.Core.TyCo.Rep import GHC.Core.TyCo.Ppr( debugPprType ) import GHC.Tc.Utils.TcMType import GHC.Tc.Utils.Monad import GHC.Tc.Utils.TcType import GHC.Tc.Utils.Env import GHC.Core.Type import GHC.Core.Coercion import GHC.Core.Multiplicity import GHC.Tc.Types.Evidence import GHC.Tc.Types.Constraint import GHC.Core.Predicate import GHC.Tc.Types.Origin import GHC.Types.Name( isSystemName ) import GHC.Tc.Utils.Instantiate import GHC.Core.TyCon import GHC.Builtin.Types import GHC.Types.Var as Var import GHC.Types.Var.Set import GHC.Types.Var.Env import GHC.Utils.Error import GHC.Driver.Session import GHC.Types.Basic import GHC.Data.Bag import GHC.Utils.Misc import qualified GHC.LanguageExtensions as LangExt import GHC.Utils.Outputable as Outputable import Control.Monad import Control.Arrow ( second ) {- ************************************************************************ * * matchExpected functions * * ************************************************************************ Note [Herald for matchExpectedFunTys] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The 'herald' always looks like: "The equation(s) for 'f' have" "The abstraction (\x.e) takes" "The section (+ x) expects" "The function 'f' is applied to" This is used to construct a message of form The abstraction `\Just 1 -> ...' takes two arguments but its type `Maybe a -> a' has only one The equation(s) for `f' have two arguments but its type `Maybe a -> a' has only one The section `(f 3)' requires 'f' to take two arguments but its type `Int -> Int' has only one The function 'f' is applied to two arguments but its type `Int -> Int' has only one When visible type applications (e.g., `f @Int 1 2`, as in #13902) enter the picture, we have a choice in deciding whether to count the type applications as proper arguments: The function 'f' is applied to one visible type argument and two value arguments but its type `forall a. a -> a` has only one visible type argument and one value argument Or whether to include the type applications as part of the herald itself: The expression 'f @Int' is applied to two arguments but its type `Int -> Int` has only one The latter is easier to implement and is arguably easier to understand, so we choose to implement that option. Note [matchExpectedFunTys] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ matchExpectedFunTys checks that a sigma has the form of an n-ary function. It passes the decomposed type to the thing_inside, and returns a wrapper to coerce between the two types It's used wherever a language construct must have a functional type, namely: A lambda expression A function definition An operator section This function must be written CPS'd because it needs to fill in the ExpTypes produced for arguments before it can fill in the ExpType passed in. -} -- Use this one when you have an "expected" type. -- This function skolemises at each polytype. matchExpectedFunTys :: forall a. SDoc -- See Note [Herald for matchExpectedFunTys] -> UserTypeCtxt -> Arity -> ExpRhoType -- Skolemised -> ([Scaled ExpSigmaType] -> ExpRhoType -> TcM a) -> TcM (HsWrapper, a) -- If matchExpectedFunTys n ty = (_, wrap) -- then wrap : (t1 -> ... -> tn -> ty_r) ~> ty, -- where [t1, ..., tn], ty_r are passed to the thing_inside matchExpectedFunTys herald ctx arity orig_ty thing_inside = case orig_ty of Check ty -> go [] arity ty _ -> defer [] arity orig_ty where -- Skolemise any foralls /before/ the zero-arg case -- so that we guarantee to return a rho-type go acc_arg_tys n ty | (tvs, theta, _) <- tcSplitSigmaTy ty , not (null tvs && null theta) = do { (wrap_gen, (wrap_res, result)) <- tcSkolemise ctx ty $ \ty' -> go acc_arg_tys n ty' ; return (wrap_gen <.> wrap_res, result) } -- No more args; do this /before/ tcView, so -- that we do not unnecessarily unwrap synonyms go acc_arg_tys 0 rho_ty = do { result <- thing_inside (reverse acc_arg_tys) (mkCheckExpType rho_ty) ; return (idHsWrapper, result) } go acc_arg_tys n ty | Just ty' <- tcView ty = go acc_arg_tys n ty' go acc_arg_tys n (FunTy { ft_mult = mult, ft_af = af, ft_arg = arg_ty, ft_res = res_ty }) = ASSERT( af == VisArg ) do { (wrap_res, result) <- go ((Scaled mult $ mkCheckExpType arg_ty) : acc_arg_tys) (n-1) res_ty ; let fun_wrap = mkWpFun idHsWrapper wrap_res (Scaled mult arg_ty) res_ty doc ; return ( fun_wrap, result ) } where doc = text "When inferring the argument type of a function with type" <+> quotes (ppr orig_ty) go acc_arg_tys n ty@(TyVarTy tv) | isMetaTyVar tv = do { cts <- readMetaTyVar tv ; case cts of Indirect ty' -> go acc_arg_tys n ty' Flexi -> defer acc_arg_tys n (mkCheckExpType ty) } -- In all other cases we bale out into ordinary unification -- However unlike the meta-tyvar case, we are sure that the -- number of arguments doesn't match arity of the original -- type, so we can add a bit more context to the error message -- (cf #7869). -- -- It is not always an error, because specialized type may have -- different arity, for example: -- -- > f1 = f2 'a' -- > f2 :: Monad m => m Bool -- > f2 = undefined -- -- But in that case we add specialized type into error context -- anyway, because it may be useful. See also #9605. go acc_arg_tys n ty = addErrCtxtM (mk_ctxt acc_arg_tys ty) $ defer acc_arg_tys n (mkCheckExpType ty) ------------ defer :: [Scaled ExpSigmaType] -> Arity -> ExpRhoType -> TcM (HsWrapper, a) defer acc_arg_tys n fun_ty = do { more_arg_tys <- replicateM n newInferExpType ; res_ty <- newInferExpType ; result <- thing_inside (reverse acc_arg_tys ++ (map unrestricted more_arg_tys)) res_ty ; more_arg_tys <- mapM readExpType more_arg_tys ; res_ty <- readExpType res_ty ; let unif_fun_ty = mkVisFunTysMany more_arg_tys res_ty ; wrap <- tcSubType AppOrigin ctx unif_fun_ty fun_ty -- Not a good origin at all :-( ; return (wrap, result) } ------------ mk_ctxt :: [Scaled ExpSigmaType] -> TcType -> TidyEnv -> TcM (TidyEnv, MsgDoc) mk_ctxt arg_tys res_ty env = do { (env', ty) <- zonkTidyTcType env (mkVisFunTys arg_tys' res_ty) ; return ( env', mk_fun_tys_msg herald ty arity) } where arg_tys' = map (\(Scaled u v) -> Scaled u (checkingExpType "matchExpectedFunTys" v)) (reverse arg_tys) -- this is safe b/c we're called from "go" -- Like 'matchExpectedFunTys', but used when you have an "actual" type, -- for example in function application matchActualFunTysRho :: SDoc -- See Note [Herald for matchExpectedFunTys] -> CtOrigin -> Maybe (HsExpr GhcRn) -- the thing with type TcSigmaType -> Arity -> TcSigmaType -> TcM (HsWrapper, [Scaled TcSigmaType], TcRhoType) -- If matchActualFunTysRho n ty = (wrap, [t1,..,tn], res_ty) -- then wrap : ty ~> (t1 -> ... -> tn -> res_ty) -- and res_ty is a RhoType -- NB: the returned type is top-instantiated; it's a RhoType matchActualFunTysRho herald ct_orig mb_thing n_val_args_wanted fun_ty = go n_val_args_wanted [] fun_ty where go 0 _ fun_ty = do { (wrap, rho) <- topInstantiate ct_orig fun_ty ; return (wrap, [], rho) } go n so_far fun_ty = do { (wrap_fun1, arg_ty1, res_ty1) <- matchActualFunTySigma herald ct_orig mb_thing (n_val_args_wanted, so_far) fun_ty ; (wrap_res, arg_tys, res_ty) <- go (n-1) (arg_ty1:so_far) res_ty1 ; let wrap_fun2 = mkWpFun idHsWrapper wrap_res arg_ty1 res_ty doc ; return (wrap_fun2 <.> wrap_fun1, arg_ty1:arg_tys, res_ty) } where doc = text "When inferring the argument type of a function with type" <+> quotes (ppr fun_ty) -- | matchActualFunTySigm does looks for just one function arrow -- returning an uninstantiated sigma-type matchActualFunTySigma :: SDoc -- See Note [Herald for matchExpectedFunTys] -> CtOrigin -> Maybe (HsExpr GhcRn) -- The thing with type TcSigmaType -> (Arity, [Scaled TcSigmaType]) -- Total number of value args in the call, and -- types of values args to which function has -- been applied already (reversed) -- Both are used only for error messages) -> TcSigmaType -- Type to analyse -> TcM (HsWrapper, Scaled TcSigmaType, TcSigmaType) -- See Note [matchActualFunTys error handling] for all these arguments -- If (wrap, arg_ty, res_ty) = matchActualFunTySigma ... fun_ty -- then wrap :: fun_ty ~> (arg_ty -> res_ty) -- and NB: res_ty is an (uninstantiated) SigmaType matchActualFunTySigma herald ct_orig mb_thing err_info fun_ty = go fun_ty -- Does not allocate unnecessary meta variables: if the input already is -- a function, we just take it apart. Not only is this efficient, -- it's important for higher rank: the argument might be of form -- (forall a. ty) -> other -- If allocated (fresh-meta-var1 -> fresh-meta-var2) and unified, we'd -- hide the forall inside a meta-variable -- (*) Sometimes it's necessary to call matchActualFunTys with only part -- (that is, to the right of some arrows) of the type of the function in -- question. (See GHC.Tc.Gen.Expr.tcArgs.) This argument is the reversed list of -- arguments already seen (that is, not part of the TcSigmaType passed -- in elsewhere). where go :: TcSigmaType -- The remainder of the type as we're processing -> TcM (HsWrapper, Scaled TcSigmaType, TcSigmaType) go ty | Just ty' <- tcView ty = go ty' go ty | not (null tvs && null theta) = do { (wrap1, rho) <- topInstantiate ct_orig ty ; (wrap2, arg_ty, res_ty) <- go rho ; return (wrap2 <.> wrap1, arg_ty, res_ty) } where (tvs, theta, _) = tcSplitSigmaTy ty go (FunTy { ft_af = af, ft_mult = w, ft_arg = arg_ty, ft_res = res_ty }) = ASSERT( af == VisArg ) return (idHsWrapper, Scaled w arg_ty, res_ty) go ty@(TyVarTy tv) | isMetaTyVar tv = do { cts <- readMetaTyVar tv ; case cts of Indirect ty' -> go ty' Flexi -> defer ty } -- In all other cases we bale out into ordinary unification -- However unlike the meta-tyvar case, we are sure that the -- number of arguments doesn't match arity of the original -- type, so we can add a bit more context to the error message -- (cf #7869). -- -- It is not always an error, because specialized type may have -- different arity, for example: -- -- > f1 = f2 'a' -- > f2 :: Monad m => m Bool -- > f2 = undefined -- -- But in that case we add specialized type into error context -- anyway, because it may be useful. See also #9605. go ty = addErrCtxtM (mk_ctxt ty) (defer ty) ------------ defer fun_ty = do { arg_ty <- newOpenFlexiTyVarTy ; res_ty <- newOpenFlexiTyVarTy ; let unif_fun_ty = mkVisFunTyMany arg_ty res_ty ; co <- unifyType mb_thing fun_ty unif_fun_ty ; return (mkWpCastN co, unrestricted arg_ty, res_ty) } ------------ mk_ctxt :: TcType -> TidyEnv -> TcM (TidyEnv, MsgDoc) mk_ctxt res_ty env = do { (env', ty) <- zonkTidyTcType env $ mkVisFunTys (reverse arg_tys_so_far) res_ty ; return (env', mk_fun_tys_msg herald ty n_val_args_in_call) } (n_val_args_in_call, arg_tys_so_far) = err_info mk_fun_tys_msg :: SDoc -> TcType -> Arity -> SDoc mk_fun_tys_msg herald ty n_args_in_call | n_args_in_call <= n_fun_args -- Enough args, in the end = text "In the result of a function call" | otherwise = hang (herald <+> speakNOf n_args_in_call (text "value argument") <> comma) 2 (sep [ text "but its type" <+> quotes (pprType ty) , if n_fun_args == 0 then text "has none" else text "has only" <+> speakN n_fun_args]) where (args, _) = tcSplitFunTys ty n_fun_args = length args {- Note [matchActualFunTys error handling] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ matchActualFunTysPart is made much more complicated by the desire to produce good error messages. Consider the application f @Int x y In GHC.Tc.Gen.Expr.tcArgs we deal with visible type arguments, and then call matchActualFunTysPart for each individual value argument. It, in turn, must instantiate any type/dictionary args, before looking for an arrow type. But if it doesn't find an arrow type, it wants to generate a message like "f is applied to two arguments but its type only has one". To do that, it needs to konw about the args that tcArgs has already munched up -- hence passing in n_val_args_in_call and arg_tys_so_far; and hence also the accumulating so_far arg to 'go'. This allows us (in mk_ctxt) to construct f's /instantiated/ type, with just the values-arg arrows, which is what we really want in the error message. Ugh! -} ---------------------- matchExpectedListTy :: TcRhoType -> TcM (TcCoercionN, TcRhoType) -- Special case for lists matchExpectedListTy exp_ty = do { (co, [elt_ty]) <- matchExpectedTyConApp listTyCon exp_ty ; return (co, elt_ty) } --------------------- matchExpectedTyConApp :: TyCon -- T :: forall kv1 ... kvm. k1 -> ... -> kn -> * -> TcRhoType -- orig_ty -> TcM (TcCoercionN, -- T k1 k2 k3 a b c ~N orig_ty [TcSigmaType]) -- Element types, k1 k2 k3 a b c -- It's used for wired-in tycons, so we call checkWiredInTyCon -- Precondition: never called with FunTyCon -- Precondition: input type :: * -- Postcondition: (T k1 k2 k3 a b c) is well-kinded matchExpectedTyConApp tc orig_ty = ASSERT(not $ isFunTyCon tc) go orig_ty where go ty | Just ty' <- tcView ty = go ty' go ty@(TyConApp tycon args) | tc == tycon -- Common case = return (mkTcNomReflCo ty, args) go (TyVarTy tv) | isMetaTyVar tv = do { cts <- readMetaTyVar tv ; case cts of Indirect ty -> go ty Flexi -> defer } go _ = defer -- If the common case does not occur, instantiate a template -- T k1 .. kn t1 .. tm, and unify with the original type -- Doing it this way ensures that the types we return are -- kind-compatible with T. For example, suppose we have -- matchExpectedTyConApp T (f Maybe) -- where data T a = MkT a -- Then we don't want to instantiate T's data constructors with -- (a::*) ~ Maybe -- because that'll make types that are utterly ill-kinded. -- This happened in #7368 defer = do { (_, arg_tvs) <- newMetaTyVars (tyConTyVars tc) ; traceTc "matchExpectedTyConApp" (ppr tc $$ ppr (tyConTyVars tc) $$ ppr arg_tvs) ; let args = mkTyVarTys arg_tvs tc_template = mkTyConApp tc args ; co <- unifyType Nothing tc_template orig_ty ; return (co, args) } ---------------------- matchExpectedAppTy :: TcRhoType -- orig_ty -> TcM (TcCoercion, -- m a ~N orig_ty (TcSigmaType, TcSigmaType)) -- Returns m, a -- If the incoming type is a mutable type variable of kind k, then -- matchExpectedAppTy returns a new type variable (m: * -> k); note the *. matchExpectedAppTy orig_ty = go orig_ty where go ty | Just ty' <- tcView ty = go ty' | Just (fun_ty, arg_ty) <- tcSplitAppTy_maybe ty = return (mkTcNomReflCo orig_ty, (fun_ty, arg_ty)) go (TyVarTy tv) | isMetaTyVar tv = do { cts <- readMetaTyVar tv ; case cts of Indirect ty -> go ty Flexi -> defer } go _ = defer -- Defer splitting by generating an equality constraint defer = do { ty1 <- newFlexiTyVarTy kind1 ; ty2 <- newFlexiTyVarTy kind2 ; co <- unifyType Nothing (mkAppTy ty1 ty2) orig_ty ; return (co, (ty1, ty2)) } orig_kind = tcTypeKind orig_ty kind1 = mkVisFunTyMany liftedTypeKind orig_kind kind2 = liftedTypeKind -- m :: * -> k -- arg type :: * {- ************************************************************************ * * Subsumption checking * * ************************************************************************ Note [Subsumption checking: tcSubType] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ All the tcSubType calls have the form tcSubType actual_ty expected_ty which checks actual_ty <= expected_ty That is, that a value of type actual_ty is acceptable in a place expecting a value of type expected_ty. I.e. that actual ty is more polymorphic than expected_ty It returns a wrapper function co_fn :: actual_ty ~ expected_ty which takes an HsExpr of type actual_ty into one of type expected_ty. -} ----------------- -- tcWrapResult needs both un-type-checked (for origins and error messages) -- and type-checked (for wrapping) expressions tcWrapResult :: HsExpr GhcRn -> HsExpr GhcTc -> TcSigmaType -> ExpRhoType -> TcM (HsExpr GhcTc) tcWrapResult rn_expr = tcWrapResultO (exprCtOrigin rn_expr) rn_expr tcWrapResultO :: CtOrigin -> HsExpr GhcRn -> HsExpr GhcTc -> TcSigmaType -> ExpRhoType -> TcM (HsExpr GhcTc) tcWrapResultO orig rn_expr expr actual_ty res_ty = do { traceTc "tcWrapResult" (vcat [ text "Actual: " <+> ppr actual_ty , text "Expected:" <+> ppr res_ty ]) ; wrap <- tcSubTypeNC orig GenSigCtxt (Just rn_expr) actual_ty res_ty ; return (mkHsWrap wrap expr) } tcWrapResultMono :: HsExpr GhcRn -> HsExpr GhcTc -> TcRhoType -- Actual -- a rho-type not a sigma-type -> ExpRhoType -- Expected -> TcM (HsExpr GhcTc) -- A version of tcWrapResult to use when the actual type is a -- rho-type, so nothing to instantiate; just go straight to unify. -- It means we don't need to pass in a CtOrigin tcWrapResultMono rn_expr expr act_ty res_ty = ASSERT2( isRhoTy act_ty, ppr act_ty $$ ppr rn_expr ) do { co <- case res_ty of Infer inf_res -> fillInferResult act_ty inf_res Check exp_ty -> unifyType (Just rn_expr) act_ty exp_ty ; return (mkHsWrapCo co expr) } ------------------------ tcSubTypePat :: CtOrigin -> UserTypeCtxt -> ExpSigmaType -> TcSigmaType -> TcM HsWrapper -- Used in patterns; polarity is backwards compared -- to tcSubType -- If wrap = tc_sub_type_et t1 t2 -- => wrap :: t1 ~> t2 tcSubTypePat inst_orig ctxt (Check ty_actual) ty_expected = tc_sub_type unifyTypeET inst_orig ctxt ty_actual ty_expected tcSubTypePat _ _ (Infer inf_res) ty_expected = do { co <- fillInferResult ty_expected inf_res -- In patterns we do not instantatiate ; return (mkWpCastN (mkTcSymCo co)) } --------------- tcSubType :: CtOrigin -> UserTypeCtxt -> TcSigmaType -- Actual -> ExpRhoType -- Expected -> TcM HsWrapper -- Checks that 'actual' is more polymorphic than 'expected' tcSubType orig ctxt ty_actual ty_expected = addSubTypeCtxt ty_actual ty_expected $ do { traceTc "tcSubType" (vcat [pprUserTypeCtxt ctxt, ppr ty_actual, ppr ty_expected]) ; tcSubTypeNC orig ctxt Nothing ty_actual ty_expected } tcSubTypeNC :: CtOrigin -- Used when instantiating -> UserTypeCtxt -- Used when skolemising -> Maybe (HsExpr GhcRn) -- The expression that has type 'actual' (if known) -> TcSigmaType -- Actual type -> ExpRhoType -- Expected type -> TcM HsWrapper tcSubTypeNC inst_orig ctxt m_thing ty_actual res_ty = case res_ty of Check ty_expected -> tc_sub_type (unifyType m_thing) inst_orig ctxt ty_actual ty_expected Infer inf_res -> do { (wrap, rho) <- topInstantiate inst_orig ty_actual -- See Note [Instantiation of InferResult] ; co <- fillInferResult rho inf_res ; return (mkWpCastN co <.> wrap) } {- Note [Instantiation of InferResult] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We now always instantiate before filling in InferResult, so that the result is a TcRhoType: see #17173 for discussion. For example: 1. Consider f x = (*) We want to instantiate the type of (*) before returning, else we will infer the type f :: forall {a}. a -> forall b. Num b => b -> b -> b This is surely confusing for users. And worse, the monomorphism restriction won't work properly. The MR is dealt with in simplifyInfer, and simplifyInfer has no way of instantiating. This could perhaps be worked around, but it may be hard to know even when instantiation should happen. 2. Another reason. Consider f :: (?x :: Int) => a -> a g y = let ?x = 3::Int in f Here want to instantiate f's type so that the ?x::Int constraint gets discharged by the enclosing implicit-parameter binding. 3. Suppose one defines plus = (+). If we instantiate lazily, we will infer plus :: forall a. Num a => a -> a -> a. However, the monomorphism restriction compels us to infer plus :: Integer -> Integer -> Integer (or similar monotype). Indeed, the only way to know whether to apply the monomorphism restriction at all is to instantiate There is one place where we don't want to instantiate eagerly, namely in GHC.Tc.Module.tcRnExpr, which implements GHCi's :type command. See Note [Implementing :type] in GHC.Tc.Module. -} --------------- tcSubTypeSigma :: UserTypeCtxt -> TcSigmaType -> TcSigmaType -> TcM HsWrapper -- External entry point, but no ExpTypes on either side -- Checks that actual <= expected -- Returns HsWrapper :: actual ~ expected tcSubTypeSigma ctxt ty_actual ty_expected = tc_sub_type (unifyType Nothing) eq_orig ctxt ty_actual ty_expected where eq_orig = TypeEqOrigin { uo_actual = ty_actual , uo_expected = ty_expected , uo_thing = Nothing , uo_visible = True } --------------- tc_sub_type :: (TcType -> TcType -> TcM TcCoercionN) -- How to unify -> CtOrigin -- Used when instantiating -> UserTypeCtxt -- Used when skolemising -> TcSigmaType -- Actual; a sigma-type -> TcSigmaType -- Expected; also a sigma-type -> TcM HsWrapper -- Checks that actual_ty is more polymorphic than expected_ty -- If wrap = tc_sub_type t1 t2 -- => wrap :: t1 ~> t2 tc_sub_type unify inst_orig ctxt ty_actual ty_expected | definitely_poly ty_expected -- See Note [Don't skolemise unnecessarily] , not (possibly_poly ty_actual) = do { traceTc "tc_sub_type (drop to equality)" $ vcat [ text "ty_actual =" <+> ppr ty_actual , text "ty_expected =" <+> ppr ty_expected ] ; mkWpCastN <$> unify ty_actual ty_expected } | otherwise -- This is the general case = do { traceTc "tc_sub_type (general case)" $ vcat [ text "ty_actual =" <+> ppr ty_actual , text "ty_expected =" <+> ppr ty_expected ] ; (sk_wrap, inner_wrap) <- tcSkolemise ctxt ty_expected $ \ sk_rho -> do { (wrap, rho_a) <- topInstantiate inst_orig ty_actual ; cow <- unify rho_a sk_rho ; return (mkWpCastN cow <.> wrap) } ; return (sk_wrap <.> inner_wrap) } where possibly_poly ty | isForAllTy ty = True | Just (_, _, res) <- splitFunTy_maybe ty = possibly_poly res | otherwise = False -- NB *not* tcSplitFunTy, because here we want -- to decompose type-class arguments too definitely_poly ty | (tvs, theta, tau) <- tcSplitSigmaTy ty , (tv:_) <- tvs , null theta , isInsolubleOccursCheck NomEq tv tau = True | otherwise = False ------------------------ addSubTypeCtxt :: TcType -> ExpType -> TcM a -> TcM a addSubTypeCtxt ty_actual ty_expected thing_inside | isRhoTy ty_actual -- If there is no polymorphism involved, the , isRhoExpTy ty_expected -- TypeEqOrigin stuff (added by the _NC functions) = thing_inside -- gives enough context by itself | otherwise = addErrCtxtM mk_msg thing_inside where mk_msg tidy_env = do { (tidy_env, ty_actual) <- zonkTidyTcType tidy_env ty_actual -- might not be filled if we're debugging. ugh. ; mb_ty_expected <- readExpType_maybe ty_expected ; (tidy_env, ty_expected) <- case mb_ty_expected of Just ty -> second mkCheckExpType <$> zonkTidyTcType tidy_env ty Nothing -> return (tidy_env, ty_expected) ; ty_expected <- readExpType ty_expected ; (tidy_env, ty_expected) <- zonkTidyTcType tidy_env ty_expected ; let msg = vcat [ hang (text "When checking that:") 4 (ppr ty_actual) , nest 2 (hang (text "is more polymorphic than:") 2 (ppr ty_expected)) ] ; return (tidy_env, msg) } {- Note [Don't skolemise unnecessarily] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we are trying to solve (Char->Char) <= (forall a. a->a) We could skolemise the 'forall a', and then complain that (Char ~ a) is insoluble; but that's a pretty obscure error. It's better to say that (Char->Char) ~ (forall a. a->a) fails. So roughly: * if the ty_expected has an outermost forall (i.e. skolemisation is the next thing we'd do) * and the ty_actual has no top-level polymorphism (but looking deeply) then we can revert to simple equality. But we need to be careful. These examples are all fine: * (Char -> forall a. a->a) <= (forall a. Char -> a -> a) Polymorphism is buried in ty_actual * (Char->Char) <= (forall a. Char -> Char) ty_expected isn't really polymorphic * (Char->Char) <= (forall a. (a~Char) => a -> a) ty_expected isn't really polymorphic * (Char->Char) <= (forall a. F [a] Char -> Char) where type instance F [x] t = t ty_expected isn't really polymorphic If we prematurely go to equality we'll reject a program we should accept (e.g. #13752). So the test (which is only to improve error message) is very conservative: * ty_actual is /definitely/ monomorphic * ty_expected is /definitely/ polymorphic Note [Settting the argument context] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider we are doing the ambiguity check for the (bogus) f :: (forall a b. C b => a -> a) -> Int We'll call tcSubType ((forall a b. C b => a->a) -> Int ) ((forall a b. C b => a->a) -> Int ) with a UserTypeCtxt of (FunSigCtxt "f"). Then we'll do the co/contra thing on the argument type of the (->) -- and at that point we want to switch to a UserTypeCtxt of GenSigCtxt. Why? * Error messages. If we stick with FunSigCtxt we get errors like * Could not deduce: C b from the context: C b0 bound by the type signature for: f :: forall a b. C b => a->a But of course f does not have that type signature! Example tests: T10508, T7220a, Simple14 * Implications. We may decide to build an implication for the whole ambiguity check, but we don't need one for each level within it, and GHC.Tc.Utils.Unify.alwaysBuildImplication checks the UserTypeCtxt. See Note [When to build an implication] Note [Wrapper returned from tcSubMult] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ There is no notion of multiplicity coercion in Core, therefore the wrapper returned by tcSubMult (and derived functions such as tcCheckUsage and checkManyPattern) is quite unlike any other wrapper: it checks whether the coercion produced by the constraint solver is trivial, producing a type error is it is not. This is implemented via the WpMultCoercion wrapper, as desugared by GHC.HsToCore.Binds.dsHsWrapper, which does the reflexivity check. This wrapper needs to be placed in the term; otherwise, checking of the eventual coercion won't be triggered during desugaring. But it can be put anywhere, since it doesn't affect the desugared code. Why do we check this in the desugarer? It's a convenient place, since it's right after all the constraints are solved. We need the constraints to be solved to check whether they are trivial or not. Plus there is precedent for type errors during desuraging (such as the levity polymorphism restriction). An alternative would be to have a kind of constraint which can only produce trivial evidence, then this check would happen in the constraint solver. -} tcSubMult :: CtOrigin -> Mult -> Mult -> TcM HsWrapper tcSubMult origin w_actual w_expected | Just (w1, w2) <- isMultMul w_actual = do { w1 <- tcSubMult origin w1 w_expected ; w2 <- tcSubMult origin w2 w_expected ; return (w1 <.> w2) } -- Currently, we consider p*q and sup p q to be equal. Therefore, p*q <= r is -- equivalent to p <= r and q <= r. For other cases, we approximate p <= q by p -- ~ q. This is not complete, but it's sound. See also Note [Overapproximating -- multiplicities] in Multiplicity. tcSubMult origin w_actual w_expected = case submult w_actual w_expected of Submult -> return WpHole Unknown -> tcEqMult origin w_actual w_expected tcEqMult :: CtOrigin -> Mult -> Mult -> TcM HsWrapper tcEqMult origin w_actual w_expected = do { -- Note that here we do not call to `submult`, so we check -- for strict equality. ; coercion <- uType TypeLevel origin w_actual w_expected ; return $ if isReflCo coercion then WpHole else WpMultCoercion coercion } {- ********************************************************************* * * Generalisation * * ********************************************************************* -} {- Note [Skolemisation] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ tcSkolemise takes "expected type" and strip off quantifiers to expose the type underneath, binding the new skolems for the 'thing_inside' The returned 'HsWrapper' has type (specific_ty -> expected_ty). Note that for a nested type like forall a. Eq a => forall b. Ord b => blah we still only build one implication constraint forall a b. (Eq a, Ord b) => <constraints> This is just an optimisation, but it's why we use topSkolemise to build the pieces from all the layers, before making a single call to checkConstraints. tcSkolemiseScoped is very similar, but differs in two ways: * It deals specially with just the outer forall, bringing those type variables into lexical scope. To my surprise, I found that doing this regardless (in tcSkolemise) caused a non-trivial (1%-ish) perf hit on the compiler. * It always calls checkConstraints, even if there are no skolem variables at all. Reason: there might be nested deferred errors that must not be allowed to float to top level. See Note [When to build an implication] below. -} tcSkolemise, tcSkolemiseScoped :: UserTypeCtxt -> TcSigmaType -> (TcType -> TcM result) -> TcM (HsWrapper, result) -- ^ The wrapper has type: spec_ty ~> expected_ty tcSkolemiseScoped ctxt expected_ty thing_inside = do { (wrap, tv_prs, given, rho_ty) <- topSkolemise expected_ty ; let skol_tvs = map snd tv_prs skol_info = SigSkol ctxt expected_ty tv_prs ; (ev_binds, res) <- checkConstraints skol_info skol_tvs given $ tcExtendNameTyVarEnv tv_prs $ thing_inside rho_ty ; return (wrap <.> mkWpLet ev_binds, res) } tcSkolemise ctxt expected_ty thing_inside | isRhoTy expected_ty -- Short cut for common case = do { res <- thing_inside expected_ty ; return (idHsWrapper, res) } | otherwise = do { (wrap, tv_prs, given, rho_ty) <- topSkolemise expected_ty ; let skol_tvs = map snd tv_prs skol_info = SigSkol ctxt expected_ty tv_prs ; (ev_binds, result) <- checkConstraints skol_info skol_tvs given $ thing_inside rho_ty ; return (wrap <.> mkWpLet ev_binds, result) } -- The ev_binds returned by checkConstraints is very -- often empty, in which case mkWpLet is a no-op -- | Variant of 'tcSkolemise' that takes an ExpType tcSkolemiseET :: UserTypeCtxt -> ExpSigmaType -> (ExpRhoType -> TcM result) -> TcM (HsWrapper, result) tcSkolemiseET _ et@(Infer {}) thing_inside = (idHsWrapper, ) <$> thing_inside et tcSkolemiseET ctxt (Check ty) thing_inside = tcSkolemise ctxt ty $ \rho_ty -> thing_inside (mkCheckExpType rho_ty) checkConstraints :: SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -- Skolems -> [EvVar] -- Given -> TcM result -> TcM (TcEvBinds, result) checkConstraints skol_info skol_tvs given thing_inside = do { implication_needed <- implicationNeeded skol_info skol_tvs given ; if implication_needed then do { (tclvl, wanted, result) <- pushLevelAndCaptureConstraints thing_inside ; (implics, ev_binds) <- buildImplicationFor tclvl skol_info skol_tvs given wanted ; traceTc "checkConstraints" (ppr tclvl $$ ppr skol_tvs) ; emitImplications implics ; return (ev_binds, result) } else -- Fast path. We check every function argument with tcCheckPolyExpr, -- which uses tcSkolemise and hence checkConstraints. -- So this fast path is well-exercised do { res <- thing_inside ; return (emptyTcEvBinds, res) } } checkTvConstraints :: SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -- Skolem tyvars -> TcM result -> TcM result checkTvConstraints skol_info skol_tvs thing_inside = do { (tclvl, wanted, result) <- pushLevelAndCaptureConstraints thing_inside ; emitResidualTvConstraint skol_info skol_tvs tclvl wanted ; return result } emitResidualTvConstraint :: SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -> TcLevel -> WantedConstraints -> TcM () emitResidualTvConstraint skol_info skol_tvs tclvl wanted | isEmptyWC wanted = return () | otherwise = do { implic <- buildTvImplication skol_info skol_tvs tclvl wanted ; emitImplication implic } buildTvImplication :: SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -> TcLevel -> WantedConstraints -> TcM Implication buildTvImplication skol_info skol_tvs tclvl wanted = do { ev_binds <- newNoTcEvBinds -- Used for equalities only, so all the constraints -- are solved by filling in coercion holes, not -- by creating a value-level evidence binding ; implic <- newImplication ; return (implic { ic_tclvl = tclvl , ic_skols = skol_tvs , ic_no_eqs = True , ic_wanted = wanted , ic_binds = ev_binds , ic_info = skol_info }) } implicationNeeded :: SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -> [EvVar] -> TcM Bool -- See Note [When to build an implication] implicationNeeded skol_info skol_tvs given | null skol_tvs , null given , not (alwaysBuildImplication skol_info) = -- Empty skolems and givens do { tc_lvl <- getTcLevel ; if not (isTopTcLevel tc_lvl) -- No implication needed if we are then return False -- already inside an implication else do { dflags <- getDynFlags -- If any deferral can happen, -- we must build an implication ; return (gopt Opt_DeferTypeErrors dflags || gopt Opt_DeferTypedHoles dflags || gopt Opt_DeferOutOfScopeVariables dflags) } } | otherwise -- Non-empty skolems or givens = return True -- Definitely need an implication alwaysBuildImplication :: SkolemInfo -> Bool -- See Note [When to build an implication] alwaysBuildImplication _ = False {- Commmented out for now while I figure out about error messages. See #14185 alwaysBuildImplication (SigSkol ctxt _ _) = case ctxt of FunSigCtxt {} -> True -- RHS of a binding with a signature _ -> False alwaysBuildImplication (RuleSkol {}) = True alwaysBuildImplication (InstSkol {}) = True alwaysBuildImplication (FamInstSkol {}) = True alwaysBuildImplication _ = False -} buildImplicationFor :: TcLevel -> SkolemInfo -> [TcTyVar] -> [EvVar] -> WantedConstraints -> TcM (Bag Implication, TcEvBinds) buildImplicationFor tclvl skol_info skol_tvs given wanted | isEmptyWC wanted && null given -- Optimisation : if there are no wanteds, and no givens -- don't generate an implication at all. -- Reason for the (null given): we don't want to lose -- the "inaccessible alternative" error check = return (emptyBag, emptyTcEvBinds) | otherwise = ASSERT2( all (isSkolemTyVar <||> isTyVarTyVar) skol_tvs, ppr skol_tvs ) -- Why allow TyVarTvs? Because implicitly declared kind variables in -- non-CUSK type declarations are TyVarTvs, and we need to bring them -- into scope as a skolem in an implication. This is OK, though, -- because TyVarTvs will always remain tyvars, even after unification. do { ev_binds_var <- newTcEvBinds ; implic <- newImplication ; let implic' = implic { ic_tclvl = tclvl , ic_skols = skol_tvs , ic_given = given , ic_wanted = wanted , ic_binds = ev_binds_var , ic_info = skol_info } ; return (unitBag implic', TcEvBinds ev_binds_var) } {- Note [When to build an implication] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we have some 'skolems' and some 'givens', and we are considering whether to wrap the constraints in their scope into an implication. We must /always/ so if either 'skolems' or 'givens' are non-empty. But what if both are empty? You might think we could always drop the implication. Other things being equal, the fewer implications the better. Less clutter and overhead. But we must take care: * If we have an unsolved [W] g :: a ~# b, and -fdefer-type-errors, we'll make a /term-level/ evidence binding for 'g = error "blah"'. We must have an EvBindsVar those bindings!, otherwise they end up as top-level unlifted bindings, which are verboten. This only matters at top level, so we check for that See also Note [Deferred errors for coercion holes] in GHC.Tc.Errors. cf #14149 for an example of what goes wrong. * If you have f :: Int; f = f_blah g :: Bool; g = g_blah If we don't build an implication for f or g (no tyvars, no givens), the constraints for f_blah and g_blah are solved together. And that can yield /very/ confusing error messages, because we can get [W] C Int b1 -- from f_blah [W] C Int b2 -- from g_blan and fundpes can yield [D] b1 ~ b2, even though the two functions have literally nothing to do with each other. #14185 is an example. Building an implication keeps them separage. -} {- ************************************************************************ * * Boxy unification * * ************************************************************************ The exported functions are all defined as versions of some non-exported generic functions. -} unifyType :: Maybe (HsExpr GhcRn) -- ^ If present, has type 'ty1' -> TcTauType -> TcTauType -> TcM TcCoercionN -- Actual and expected types -- Returns a coercion : ty1 ~ ty2 unifyType thing ty1 ty2 = uType TypeLevel origin ty1 ty2 where origin = TypeEqOrigin { uo_actual = ty1 , uo_expected = ty2 , uo_thing = ppr <$> thing , uo_visible = True } unifyTypeET :: TcTauType -> TcTauType -> TcM CoercionN -- Like unifyType, but swap expected and actual in error messages -- This is used when typechecking patterns unifyTypeET ty1 ty2 = uType TypeLevel origin ty1 ty2 where origin = TypeEqOrigin { uo_actual = ty2 -- NB swapped , uo_expected = ty1 -- NB swapped , uo_thing = Nothing , uo_visible = True } unifyKind :: Maybe (HsType GhcRn) -> TcKind -> TcKind -> TcM CoercionN unifyKind thing ty1 ty2 = uType KindLevel origin ty1 ty2 where origin = TypeEqOrigin { uo_actual = ty1 , uo_expected = ty2 , uo_thing = ppr <$> thing , uo_visible = True } {- %************************************************************************ %* * uType and friends %* * %************************************************************************ uType is the heart of the unifier. -} uType, uType_defer :: TypeOrKind -> CtOrigin -> TcType -- ty1 is the *actual* type -> TcType -- ty2 is the *expected* type -> TcM CoercionN -------------- -- It is always safe to defer unification to the main constraint solver -- See Note [Deferred unification] uType_defer t_or_k origin ty1 ty2 = do { co <- emitWantedEq origin t_or_k Nominal ty1 ty2 -- Error trace only -- NB. do *not* call mkErrInfo unless tracing is on, -- because it is hugely expensive (#5631) ; whenDOptM Opt_D_dump_tc_trace $ do { ctxt <- getErrCtxt ; doc <- mkErrInfo emptyTidyEnv ctxt ; traceTc "utype_defer" (vcat [ debugPprType ty1 , debugPprType ty2 , pprCtOrigin origin , doc]) ; traceTc "utype_defer2" (ppr co) } ; return co } -------------- uType t_or_k origin orig_ty1 orig_ty2 = do { tclvl <- getTcLevel ; traceTc "u_tys" $ vcat [ text "tclvl" <+> ppr tclvl , sep [ ppr orig_ty1, text "~", ppr orig_ty2] , pprCtOrigin origin] ; co <- go orig_ty1 orig_ty2 ; if isReflCo co then traceTc "u_tys yields no coercion" Outputable.empty else traceTc "u_tys yields coercion:" (ppr co) ; return co } where go :: TcType -> TcType -> TcM CoercionN -- The arguments to 'go' are always semantically identical -- to orig_ty{1,2} except for looking through type synonyms -- Unwrap casts before looking for variables. This way, we can easily -- recognize (t |> co) ~ (t |> co), which is nice. Previously, we -- didn't do it this way, and then the unification above was deferred. go (CastTy t1 co1) t2 = do { co_tys <- uType t_or_k origin t1 t2 ; return (mkCoherenceLeftCo Nominal t1 co1 co_tys) } go t1 (CastTy t2 co2) = do { co_tys <- uType t_or_k origin t1 t2 ; return (mkCoherenceRightCo Nominal t2 co2 co_tys) } -- Variables; go for uUnfilledVar -- Note that we pass in *original* (before synonym expansion), -- so that type variables tend to get filled in with -- the most informative version of the type go (TyVarTy tv1) ty2 = do { lookup_res <- lookupTcTyVar tv1 ; case lookup_res of Filled ty1 -> do { traceTc "found filled tyvar" (ppr tv1 <+> text ":->" <+> ppr ty1) ; go ty1 ty2 } Unfilled _ -> uUnfilledVar origin t_or_k NotSwapped tv1 ty2 } go ty1 (TyVarTy tv2) = do { lookup_res <- lookupTcTyVar tv2 ; case lookup_res of Filled ty2 -> do { traceTc "found filled tyvar" (ppr tv2 <+> text ":->" <+> ppr ty2) ; go ty1 ty2 } Unfilled _ -> uUnfilledVar origin t_or_k IsSwapped tv2 ty1 } -- See Note [Expanding synonyms during unification] go ty1@(TyConApp tc1 []) (TyConApp tc2 []) | tc1 == tc2 = return $ mkNomReflCo ty1 -- See Note [Expanding synonyms during unification] -- -- Also NB that we recurse to 'go' so that we don't push a -- new item on the origin stack. As a result if we have -- type Foo = Int -- and we try to unify Foo ~ Bool -- we'll end up saying "can't match Foo with Bool" -- rather than "can't match "Int with Bool". See #4535. go ty1 ty2 | Just ty1' <- tcView ty1 = go ty1' ty2 | Just ty2' <- tcView ty2 = go ty1 ty2' -- Functions (or predicate functions) just check the two parts go (FunTy _ w1 fun1 arg1) (FunTy _ w2 fun2 arg2) = do { co_l <- uType t_or_k origin fun1 fun2 ; co_r <- uType t_or_k origin arg1 arg2 ; co_w <- uType t_or_k origin w1 w2 ; return $ mkFunCo Nominal co_w co_l co_r } -- Always defer if a type synonym family (type function) -- is involved. (Data families behave rigidly.) go ty1@(TyConApp tc1 _) ty2 | isTypeFamilyTyCon tc1 = defer ty1 ty2 go ty1 ty2@(TyConApp tc2 _) | isTypeFamilyTyCon tc2 = defer ty1 ty2 go (TyConApp tc1 tys1) (TyConApp tc2 tys2) -- See Note [Mismatched type lists and application decomposition] | tc1 == tc2, equalLength tys1 tys2 = ASSERT2( isGenerativeTyCon tc1 Nominal, ppr tc1 ) do { cos <- zipWith3M (uType t_or_k) origins' tys1 tys2 ; return $ mkTyConAppCo Nominal tc1 cos } where origins' = map (\is_vis -> if is_vis then origin else toInvisibleOrigin origin) (tcTyConVisibilities tc1) go (LitTy m) ty@(LitTy n) | m == n = return $ mkNomReflCo ty -- See Note [Care with type applications] -- Do not decompose FunTy against App; -- it's often a type error, so leave it for the constraint solver go (AppTy s1 t1) (AppTy s2 t2) = go_app (isNextArgVisible s1) s1 t1 s2 t2 go (AppTy s1 t1) (TyConApp tc2 ts2) | Just (ts2', t2') <- snocView ts2 = ASSERT( not (mustBeSaturated tc2) ) go_app (isNextTyConArgVisible tc2 ts2') s1 t1 (TyConApp tc2 ts2') t2' go (TyConApp tc1 ts1) (AppTy s2 t2) | Just (ts1', t1') <- snocView ts1 = ASSERT( not (mustBeSaturated tc1) ) go_app (isNextTyConArgVisible tc1 ts1') (TyConApp tc1 ts1') t1' s2 t2 go (CoercionTy co1) (CoercionTy co2) = do { let ty1 = coercionType co1 ty2 = coercionType co2 ; kco <- uType KindLevel (KindEqOrigin orig_ty1 (Just orig_ty2) origin (Just t_or_k)) ty1 ty2 ; return $ mkProofIrrelCo Nominal kco co1 co2 } -- Anything else fails -- E.g. unifying for-all types, which is relative unusual go ty1 ty2 = defer ty1 ty2 ------------------ defer ty1 ty2 -- See Note [Check for equality before deferring] | ty1 `tcEqType` ty2 = return (mkNomReflCo ty1) | otherwise = uType_defer t_or_k origin ty1 ty2 ------------------ go_app vis s1 t1 s2 t2 = do { co_s <- uType t_or_k origin s1 s2 ; let arg_origin | vis = origin | otherwise = toInvisibleOrigin origin ; co_t <- uType t_or_k arg_origin t1 t2 ; return $ mkAppCo co_s co_t } {- Note [Check for equality before deferring] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Particularly in ambiguity checks we can get equalities like (ty ~ ty). If ty involves a type function we may defer, which isn't very sensible. An egregious example of this was in test T9872a, which has a type signature Proxy :: Proxy (Solutions Cubes) Doing the ambiguity check on this signature generates the equality Solutions Cubes ~ Solutions Cubes and currently the constraint solver normalises both sides at vast cost. This little short-cut in 'defer' helps quite a bit. Note [Care with type applications] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Note: type applications need a bit of care! They can match FunTy and TyConApp, so use splitAppTy_maybe NB: we've already dealt with type variables and Notes, so if one type is an App the other one jolly well better be too Note [Mismatched type lists and application decomposition] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we find two TyConApps, you might think that the argument lists are guaranteed equal length. But they aren't. Consider matching w (T x) ~ Foo (T x y) We do match (w ~ Foo) first, but in some circumstances we simply create a deferred constraint; and then go ahead and match (T x ~ T x y). This came up in #3950. So either (a) either we must check for identical argument kinds when decomposing applications, (b) or we must be prepared for ill-kinded unification sub-problems Currently we adopt (b) since it seems more robust -- no need to maintain a global invariant. Note [Expanding synonyms during unification] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We expand synonyms during unification, but: * We expand *after* the variable case so that we tend to unify variables with un-expanded type synonym. This just makes it more likely that the inferred types will mention type synonyms understandable to the user * Similarly, we expand *after* the CastTy case, just in case the CastTy wraps a variable. * We expand *before* the TyConApp case. For example, if we have type Phantom a = Int and are unifying Phantom Int ~ Phantom Char it is *wrong* to unify Int and Char. * The problem case immediately above can happen only with arguments to the tycon. So we check for nullary tycons *before* expanding. This is particularly helpful when checking (* ~ *), because * is now a type synonym. Note [Deferred Unification] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We may encounter a unification ty1 ~ ty2 that cannot be performed syntactically, and yet its consistency is undetermined. Previously, there was no way to still make it consistent. So a mismatch error was issued. Now these unifications are deferred until constraint simplification, where type family instances and given equations may (or may not) establish the consistency. Deferred unifications are of the form F ... ~ ... or x ~ ... where F is a type function and x is a type variable. E.g. id :: x ~ y => x -> y id e = e involves the unification x = y. It is deferred until we bring into account the context x ~ y to establish that it holds. If available, we defer original types (rather than those where closed type synonyms have already been expanded via tcCoreView). This is, as usual, to improve error messages. ************************************************************************ * * uUnfilledVar and friends * * ************************************************************************ @uunfilledVar@ is called when at least one of the types being unified is a variable. It does {\em not} assume that the variable is a fixed point of the substitution; rather, notice that @uVar@ (defined below) nips back into @uTys@ if it turns out that the variable is already bound. -} ---------- uUnfilledVar :: CtOrigin -> TypeOrKind -> SwapFlag -> TcTyVar -- Tyvar 1: not necessarily a meta-tyvar -- definitely not a /filled/ meta-tyvar -> TcTauType -- Type 2 -> TcM Coercion -- "Unfilled" means that the variable is definitely not a filled-in meta tyvar -- It might be a skolem, or untouchable, or meta uUnfilledVar origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 = do { ty2 <- zonkTcType ty2 -- Zonk to expose things to the -- occurs check, and so that if ty2 -- looks like a type variable then it -- /is/ a type variable ; uUnfilledVar1 origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 } ---------- uUnfilledVar1 :: CtOrigin -> TypeOrKind -> SwapFlag -> TcTyVar -- Tyvar 1: not necessarily a meta-tyvar -- definitely not a /filled/ meta-tyvar -> TcTauType -- Type 2, zonked -> TcM Coercion uUnfilledVar1 origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 | Just tv2 <- tcGetTyVar_maybe ty2 = go tv2 | otherwise = uUnfilledVar2 origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 where -- 'go' handles the case where both are -- tyvars so we might want to swap -- E.g. maybe tv2 is a meta-tyvar and tv1 is not go tv2 | tv1 == tv2 -- Same type variable => no-op = return (mkNomReflCo (mkTyVarTy tv1)) | swapOverTyVars False tv1 tv2 -- Distinct type variables -- Swap meta tyvar to the left if poss = do { tv1 <- zonkTyCoVarKind tv1 -- We must zonk tv1's kind because that might -- not have happened yet, and it's an invariant of -- uUnfilledTyVar2 that ty2 is fully zonked -- Omitting this caused #16902 ; uUnfilledVar2 origin t_or_k (flipSwap swapped) tv2 (mkTyVarTy tv1) } | otherwise = uUnfilledVar2 origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 ---------- uUnfilledVar2 :: CtOrigin -> TypeOrKind -> SwapFlag -> TcTyVar -- Tyvar 1: not necessarily a meta-tyvar -- definitely not a /filled/ meta-tyvar -> TcTauType -- Type 2, zonked -> TcM Coercion uUnfilledVar2 origin t_or_k swapped tv1 ty2 = do { dflags <- getDynFlags ; cur_lvl <- getTcLevel ; go dflags cur_lvl } where go dflags cur_lvl | canSolveByUnification cur_lvl tv1 ty2 , MTVU_OK ty2' <- metaTyVarUpdateOK dflags tv1 ty2 = do { co_k <- uType KindLevel kind_origin (tcTypeKind ty2') (tyVarKind tv1) ; traceTc "uUnfilledVar2 ok" $ vcat [ ppr tv1 <+> dcolon <+> ppr (tyVarKind tv1) , ppr ty2 <+> dcolon <+> ppr (tcTypeKind ty2) , ppr (isTcReflCo co_k), ppr co_k ] ; if isTcReflCo co_k -- Only proceed if the kinds match -- NB: tv1 should still be unfilled, despite the kind unification -- because tv1 is not free in ty2 (or, hence, in its kind) then do { writeMetaTyVar tv1 ty2' ; return (mkTcNomReflCo ty2') } else defer } -- This cannot be solved now. See GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical -- Note [Equalities with incompatible kinds] | otherwise = do { traceTc "uUnfilledVar2 not ok" (ppr tv1 $$ ppr ty2) -- Occurs check or an untouchable: just defer -- NB: occurs check isn't necessarily fatal: -- eg tv1 occurred in type family parameter ; defer } ty1 = mkTyVarTy tv1 kind_origin = KindEqOrigin ty1 (Just ty2) origin (Just t_or_k) defer = unSwap swapped (uType_defer t_or_k origin) ty1 ty2 swapOverTyVars :: Bool -> TcTyVar -> TcTyVar -> Bool swapOverTyVars is_given tv1 tv2 -- See Note [Unification variables on the left] | not is_given, pri1 == 0, pri2 > 0 = True | not is_given, pri2 == 0, pri1 > 0 = False -- Level comparison: see Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation] | lvl1 `strictlyDeeperThan` lvl2 = False | lvl2 `strictlyDeeperThan` lvl1 = True -- Priority: see Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation] | pri1 > pri2 = False | pri2 > pri1 = True -- Names: see Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation] | isSystemName tv2_name, not (isSystemName tv1_name) = True | otherwise = False where lvl1 = tcTyVarLevel tv1 lvl2 = tcTyVarLevel tv2 pri1 = lhsPriority tv1 pri2 = lhsPriority tv2 tv1_name = Var.varName tv1 tv2_name = Var.varName tv2 lhsPriority :: TcTyVar -> Int -- Higher => more important to be on the LHS -- See Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation] lhsPriority tv = ASSERT2( isTyVar tv, ppr tv) case tcTyVarDetails tv of RuntimeUnk -> 0 SkolemTv {} -> 0 MetaTv { mtv_info = info } -> case info of FlatSkolTv -> 1 TyVarTv -> 2 TauTv -> 3 FlatMetaTv -> 4 {- Note [TyVar/TyVar orientation] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Given (a ~ b), should we orient the CTyEqCan as (a~b) or (b~a)? This is a surprisingly tricky question! This is invariant (TyEq:TV). The question is answered by swapOverTyVars, which is use - in the eager unifier, in GHC.Tc.Utils.Unify.uUnfilledVar1 - in the constraint solver, in GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical.canEqTyVarHomo First note: only swap if you have to! See Note [Avoid unnecessary swaps] So we look for a positive reason to swap, using a three-step test: * Level comparison. If 'a' has deeper level than 'b', put 'a' on the left. See Note [Deeper level on the left] * Priority. If the levels are the same, look at what kind of type variable it is, using 'lhsPriority'. Generally speaking we always try to put a MetaTv on the left in preference to SkolemTv or RuntimeUnkTv: a) Because the MetaTv may be touchable and can be unified b) Even if it's not touchable, GHC.Tc.Solver.floatEqualities looks for meta tyvars on the left Tie-breaking rules for MetaTvs: - FlatMetaTv = 4: always put on the left. See Note [Fmv Orientation Invariant] NB: FlatMetaTvs always have the current level, never an outer one. So nothing can be deeper than a FlatMetaTv. - TauTv = 3: if we have tyv_tv ~ tau_tv, put tau_tv on the left because there are fewer restrictions on updating TauTvs. Or to say it another way, then we won't lose the TyVarTv flag - TyVarTv = 2: remember, flat-skols are *only* updated by the unflattener, never unified, so TyVarTvs come next - FlatSkolTv = 1: put on the left in preference to a SkolemTv. See Note [Eliminate flat-skols] * Names. If the level and priority comparisons are all equal, try to eliminate a TyVars with a System Name in favour of ones with a Name derived from a user type signature * Age. At one point in the past we tried to break any remaining ties by eliminating the younger type variable, based on their Uniques. See Note [Eliminate younger unification variables] (which also explains why we don't do this any more) Note [Unification variables on the left] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ For wanteds, but not givens, swap (skolem ~ meta-tv) regardless of level, so that the unification variable is on the left. * We /don't/ want this for Givens because if we ave [G] a[2] ~ alpha[1] [W] Bool ~ a[2] we want to rewrite the wanted to Bool ~ alpha[1], so we can float the constraint and solve it. * But for Wanteds putting the unification variable on the left means an easier job when floating, and when reporting errors -- just fewer cases to consider. In particular, we get better skolem-escape messages: see #18114 Note [Deeper level on the left] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The most important thing is that we want to put tyvars with the deepest level on the left. The reason to do so differs for Wanteds and Givens, but either way, deepest wins! Simple. * Wanteds. Putting the deepest variable on the left maximise the chances that it's a touchable meta-tyvar which can be solved. * Givens. Suppose we have something like forall a[2]. b[1] ~ a[2] => beta[1] ~ a[2] If we orient the Given a[2] on the left, we'll rewrite the Wanted to (beta[1] ~ b[1]), and that can float out of the implication. Otherwise it can't. By putting the deepest variable on the left we maximise our changes of eliminating skolem capture. See also GHC.Tc.Solver.Monad Note [Let-bound skolems] for another reason to orient with the deepest skolem on the left. IMPORTANT NOTE: this test does a level-number comparison on skolems, so it's important that skolems have (accurate) level numbers. See #15009 for an further analysis of why "deepest on the left" is a good plan. Note [Fmv Orientation Invariant] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * We always orient a constraint fmv ~ alpha with fmv on the left, even if alpha is a touchable unification variable Reason: doing it the other way round would unify alpha:=fmv, but that really doesn't add any info to alpha. But a later constraint alpha ~ Int might unlock everything. Comment:9 of #12526 gives a detailed example. WARNING: I've gone to and fro on this one several times. I'm now pretty sure that unifying alpha:=fmv is a bad idea! So orienting with fmvs on the left is a good thing. This example comes from IndTypesPerfMerge. (Others include T10226, T10009.) From the ambiguity check for f :: (F a ~ a) => a we get: [G] F a ~ a [WD] F alpha ~ alpha, alpha ~ a From Givens we get [G] F a ~ fsk, fsk ~ a Now if we flatten we get [WD] alpha ~ fmv, F alpha ~ fmv, alpha ~ a Now, if we unified alpha := fmv, we'd get [WD] F fmv ~ fmv, [WD] fmv ~ a And now we are stuck. So instead the Fmv Orientation Invariant puts the fmv on the left, giving [WD] fmv ~ alpha, [WD] F alpha ~ fmv, [WD] alpha ~ a Now we get alpha:=a, and everything works out Note [Eliminate flat-skols] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we have [G] Num (F [a]) then we flatten to [G] Num fsk [G] F [a] ~ fsk where fsk is a flatten-skolem (FlatSkolTv). Suppose we have type instance F [a] = a then we'll reduce the second constraint to [G] a ~ fsk and then replace all uses of 'a' with fsk. That's bad because in error messages instead of saying 'a' we'll say (F [a]). In all places, including those where the programmer wrote 'a' in the first place. Very confusing! See #7862. Solution: re-orient a~fsk to fsk~a, so that we preferentially eliminate the fsk. Note [Avoid unnecessary swaps] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If we swap without actually improving matters, we can get an infinite loop. Consider work item: a ~ b inert item: b ~ c We canonicalise the work-item to (a ~ c). If we then swap it before adding to the inert set, we'll add (c ~ a), and therefore kick out the inert guy, so we get new work item: b ~ c inert item: c ~ a And now the cycle just repeats Note [Eliminate younger unification variables] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Given a choice of unifying alpha := beta or beta := alpha we try, if possible, to eliminate the "younger" one, as determined by `ltUnique`. Reason: the younger one is less likely to appear free in an existing inert constraint, and hence we are less likely to be forced into kicking out and rewriting inert constraints. This is a performance optimisation only. It turns out to fix #14723 all by itself, but clearly not reliably so! It's simple to implement (see nicer_to_update_tv2 in swapOverTyVars). But, to my surprise, it didn't seem to make any significant difference to the compiler's performance, so I didn't take it any further. Still it seemed to too nice to discard altogether, so I'm leaving these notes. SLPJ Jan 18. -} -- @trySpontaneousSolve wi@ solves equalities where one side is a -- touchable unification variable. -- Returns True <=> spontaneous solve happened canSolveByUnification :: TcLevel -> TcTyVar -> TcType -> Bool canSolveByUnification tclvl tv xi | isTouchableMetaTyVar tclvl tv = case metaTyVarInfo tv of TyVarTv -> is_tyvar xi _ -> True | otherwise -- Untouchable = False where is_tyvar xi = case tcGetTyVar_maybe xi of Nothing -> False Just tv -> case tcTyVarDetails tv of MetaTv { mtv_info = info } -> case info of TyVarTv -> True _ -> False SkolemTv {} -> True RuntimeUnk -> True {- Note [Prevent unification with type families] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We prevent unification with type families because of an uneasy compromise. It's perfectly sound to unify with type families, and it even improves the error messages in the testsuite. It also modestly improves performance, at least in some cases. But it's disastrous for test case perf/compiler/T3064. Here is the problem: Suppose we have (F ty) where we also have [G] F ty ~ a. What do we do? Do we reduce F? Or do we use the given? Hard to know what's best. GHC reduces. This is a disaster for T3064, where the type's size spirals out of control during reduction. (We're not helped by the fact that the flattener re-flattens all the arguments every time around.) If we prevent unification with type families, then the solver happens to use the equality before expanding the type family. It would be lovely in the future to revisit this problem and remove this extra, unnecessary check. But we retain it for now as it seems to work better in practice. Note [Refactoring hazard: checkTauTvUpdate] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I (Richard E.) have a sad story about refactoring this code, retained here to prevent others (or a future me!) from falling into the same traps. It all started with #11407, which was caused by the fact that the TyVarTy case of defer_me didn't look in the kind. But it seemed reasonable to simply remove the defer_me check instead. It referred to two Notes (since removed) that were out of date, and the fast_check code in occurCheckExpand seemed to do just about the same thing as defer_me. The one piece that defer_me did that wasn't repeated by occurCheckExpand was the type-family check. (See Note [Prevent unification with type families].) So I checked the result of occurCheckExpand for any type family occurrences and deferred if there were any. This was done in commit e9bf7bb5cc9fb3f87dd05111aa23da76b86a8967 . This approach turned out not to be performant, because the expanded type was bigger than the original type, and tyConsOfType (needed to see if there are any type family occurrences) looks through type synonyms. So it then struck me that we could dispense with the defer_me check entirely. This simplified the code nicely, and it cut the allocations in T5030 by half. But, as documented in Note [Prevent unification with type families], this destroyed performance in T3064. Regardless, I missed this regression and the change was committed as 3f5d1a13f112f34d992f6b74656d64d95a3f506d . Bottom lines: * defer_me is back, but now fixed w.r.t. #11407. * Tread carefully before you start to refactor here. There can be lots of hard-to-predict consequences. Note [Type synonyms and the occur check] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Generally speaking we try to update a variable with type synonyms not expanded, which improves later error messages, unless looking inside a type synonym may help resolve a spurious occurs check error. Consider: type A a = () f :: (A a -> a -> ()) -> () f = \ _ -> () x :: () x = f (\ x p -> p x) We will eventually get a constraint of the form t ~ A t. The ok function above will properly expand the type (A t) to just (), which is ok to be unified with t. If we had unified with the original type A t, we would lead the type checker into an infinite loop. Hence, if the occurs check fails for a type synonym application, then (and *only* then), the ok function expands the synonym to detect opportunities for occurs check success using the underlying definition of the type synonym. The same applies later on in the constraint interaction code; see GHC.Tc.Solver.Interact, function @occ_check_ok@. Note [Non-TcTyVars in GHC.Tc.Utils.Unify] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Because the same code is now shared between unifying types and unifying kinds, we sometimes will see proper TyVars floating around the unifier. Example (from test case polykinds/PolyKinds12): type family Apply (f :: k1 -> k2) (x :: k1) :: k2 type instance Apply g y = g y When checking the instance declaration, we first *kind-check* the LHS and RHS, discovering that the instance really should be type instance Apply k3 k4 (g :: k3 -> k4) (y :: k3) = g y During this kind-checking, all the tyvars will be TcTyVars. Then, however, as a second pass, we desugar the RHS (which is done in functions prefixed with "tc" in GHC.Tc.TyCl"). By this time, all the kind-vars are proper TyVars, not TcTyVars, get some kind unification must happen. Thus, we always check if a TyVar is a TcTyVar before asking if it's a meta-tyvar. This used to not be necessary for type-checking (that is, before * :: *) because expressions get desugared via an algorithm separate from type-checking (with wrappers, etc.). Types get desugared very differently, causing this wibble in behavior seen here. -} data LookupTyVarResult -- The result of a lookupTcTyVar call = Unfilled TcTyVarDetails -- SkolemTv or virgin MetaTv | Filled TcType lookupTcTyVar :: TcTyVar -> TcM LookupTyVarResult lookupTcTyVar tyvar | MetaTv { mtv_ref = ref } <- details = do { meta_details <- readMutVar ref ; case meta_details of Indirect ty -> return (Filled ty) Flexi -> do { is_touchable <- isTouchableTcM tyvar -- Note [Unifying untouchables] ; if is_touchable then return (Unfilled details) else return (Unfilled vanillaSkolemTv) } } | otherwise = return (Unfilled details) where details = tcTyVarDetails tyvar {- Note [Unifying untouchables] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We treat an untouchable type variable as if it was a skolem. That ensures it won't unify with anything. It's a slight hack, because we return a made-up TcTyVarDetails, but I think it works smoothly. -} -- | Breaks apart a function kind into its pieces. matchExpectedFunKind :: Outputable fun => fun -- ^ type, only for errors -> Arity -- ^ n: number of desired arrows -> TcKind -- ^ fun_ kind -> TcM Coercion -- ^ co :: fun_kind ~ (arg1 -> ... -> argn -> res) matchExpectedFunKind hs_ty n k = go n k where go 0 k = return (mkNomReflCo k) go n k | Just k' <- tcView k = go n k' go n k@(TyVarTy kvar) | isMetaTyVar kvar = do { maybe_kind <- readMetaTyVar kvar ; case maybe_kind of Indirect fun_kind -> go n fun_kind Flexi -> defer n k } go n (FunTy _ w arg res) = do { co <- go (n-1) res ; return (mkTcFunCo Nominal (mkTcNomReflCo w) (mkTcNomReflCo arg) co) } go n other = defer n other defer n k = do { arg_kinds <- newMetaKindVars n ; res_kind <- newMetaKindVar ; let new_fun = mkVisFunTysMany arg_kinds res_kind origin = TypeEqOrigin { uo_actual = k , uo_expected = new_fun , uo_thing = Just (ppr hs_ty) , uo_visible = True } ; uType KindLevel origin k new_fun } {- ********************************************************************* * * Occurrence checking * * ********************************************************************* -} {- Note [Occurrence checking: look inside kinds] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we are considering unifying (alpha :: *) ~ Int -> (beta :: alpha -> alpha) This may be an error (what is that alpha doing inside beta's kind?), but we must not make the mistake of actually unifying or we'll build an infinite data structure. So when looking for occurrences of alpha in the rhs, we must look in the kinds of type variables that occur there. NB: we may be able to remove the problem via expansion; see Note [Occurs check expansion]. So we have to try that. Note [Checking for foralls] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Unless we have -XImpredicativeTypes (which is a totally unsupported feature), we do not want to unify alpha ~ (forall a. a->a) -> Int So we look for foralls hidden inside the type, and it's convenient to do that at the same time as the occurs check (which looks for occurrences of alpha). However, it's not just a question of looking for foralls /anywhere/! Consider (alpha :: forall k. k->*) ~ (beta :: forall k. k->*) This is legal; e.g. dependent/should_compile/T11635. We don't want to reject it because of the forall in beta's kind, but (see Note [Occurrence checking: look inside kinds]) we do need to look in beta's kind. So we carry a flag saying if a 'forall' is OK, and switch the flag on when stepping inside a kind. Why is it OK? Why does it not count as impredicative polymorphism? The reason foralls are bad is because we reply on "seeing" foralls when doing implicit instantiation. But the forall inside the kind is fine. We'll generate a kind equality constraint (forall k. k->*) ~ (forall k. k->*) to check that the kinds of lhs and rhs are compatible. If alpha's kind had instead been (alpha :: kappa) then this kind equality would rightly complain about unifying kappa with (forall k. k->*) -} data MetaTyVarUpdateResult a = MTVU_OK a | MTVU_Bad -- Forall, predicate, or type family | MTVU_HoleBlocker -- Blocking coercion hole -- See Note [Equalities with incompatible kinds] in "GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical" | MTVU_Occurs deriving (Functor) instance Applicative MetaTyVarUpdateResult where pure = MTVU_OK (<*>) = ap instance Monad MetaTyVarUpdateResult where MTVU_OK x >>= k = k x MTVU_Bad >>= _ = MTVU_Bad MTVU_HoleBlocker >>= _ = MTVU_HoleBlocker MTVU_Occurs >>= _ = MTVU_Occurs instance Outputable a => Outputable (MetaTyVarUpdateResult a) where ppr (MTVU_OK a) = text "MTVU_OK" <+> ppr a ppr MTVU_Bad = text "MTVU_Bad" ppr MTVU_HoleBlocker = text "MTVU_HoleBlocker" ppr MTVU_Occurs = text "MTVU_Occurs" occCheckForErrors :: DynFlags -> TcTyVar -> Type -> MetaTyVarUpdateResult () -- Just for error-message generation; so we return MetaTyVarUpdateResult -- so the caller can report the right kind of error -- Check whether -- a) the given variable occurs in the given type. -- b) there is a forall in the type (unless we have -XImpredicativeTypes) occCheckForErrors dflags tv ty = case preCheck dflags True tv ty of MTVU_OK _ -> MTVU_OK () MTVU_Bad -> MTVU_Bad MTVU_HoleBlocker -> MTVU_HoleBlocker MTVU_Occurs -> case occCheckExpand [tv] ty of Nothing -> MTVU_Occurs Just _ -> MTVU_OK () ---------------- metaTyVarUpdateOK :: DynFlags -> TcTyVar -- tv :: k1 -> TcType -- ty :: k2 -> MetaTyVarUpdateResult TcType -- possibly-expanded ty -- (metaTyVarUpdateOK tv ty) -- We are about to update the meta-tyvar tv with ty -- Check (a) that tv doesn't occur in ty (occurs check) -- (b) that ty does not have any foralls -- (in the impredicative case), or type functions -- (c) that ty does not have any blocking coercion holes -- See Note [Equalities with incompatible kinds] in "GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical" -- -- We have two possible outcomes: -- (1) Return the type to update the type variable with, -- [we know the update is ok] -- (2) Return Nothing, -- [the update might be dodgy] -- -- Note that "Nothing" does not mean "definite error". For example -- type family F a -- type instance F Int = Int -- consider -- a ~ F a -- This is perfectly reasonable, if we later get a ~ Int. For now, though, -- we return Nothing, leaving it to the later constraint simplifier to -- sort matters out. -- -- See Note [Refactoring hazard: checkTauTvUpdate] metaTyVarUpdateOK dflags tv ty = case preCheck dflags False tv ty of -- False <=> type families not ok -- See Note [Prevent unification with type families] MTVU_OK _ -> MTVU_OK ty MTVU_Bad -> MTVU_Bad -- forall, predicate, type function MTVU_HoleBlocker -> MTVU_HoleBlocker -- coercion hole MTVU_Occurs -> case occCheckExpand [tv] ty of Just expanded_ty -> MTVU_OK expanded_ty Nothing -> MTVU_Occurs preCheck :: DynFlags -> Bool -> TcTyVar -> TcType -> MetaTyVarUpdateResult () -- A quick check for -- (a) a forall type (unless -XImpredicativeTypes) -- (b) a predicate type (unless -XImpredicativeTypes) -- (c) a type family -- (d) a blocking coercion hole -- (e) an occurrence of the type variable (occurs check) -- -- For (a), (b), and (c) we check only the top level of the type, NOT -- inside the kinds of variables it mentions. For (d) we look deeply -- in coercions, and for (e) we do look in the kinds of course. preCheck dflags ty_fam_ok tv ty = fast_check ty where details = tcTyVarDetails tv impredicative_ok = canUnifyWithPolyType dflags details ok :: MetaTyVarUpdateResult () ok = MTVU_OK () fast_check :: TcType -> MetaTyVarUpdateResult () fast_check (TyVarTy tv') | tv == tv' = MTVU_Occurs | otherwise = fast_check_occ (tyVarKind tv') -- See Note [Occurrence checking: look inside kinds] fast_check (TyConApp tc tys) | bad_tc tc = MTVU_Bad | otherwise = mapM fast_check tys >> ok fast_check (LitTy {}) = ok fast_check (FunTy{ft_af = af, ft_mult = w, ft_arg = a, ft_res = r}) | InvisArg <- af , not impredicative_ok = MTVU_Bad | otherwise = fast_check w >> fast_check a >> fast_check r fast_check (AppTy fun arg) = fast_check fun >> fast_check arg fast_check (CastTy ty co) = fast_check ty >> fast_check_co co fast_check (CoercionTy co) = fast_check_co co fast_check (ForAllTy (Bndr tv' _) ty) | not impredicative_ok = MTVU_Bad | tv == tv' = ok | otherwise = do { fast_check_occ (tyVarKind tv') ; fast_check_occ ty } -- Under a forall we look only for occurrences of -- the type variable -- For kinds, we only do an occurs check; we do not worry -- about type families or foralls -- See Note [Checking for foralls] fast_check_occ k | tv `elemVarSet` tyCoVarsOfType k = MTVU_Occurs | otherwise = ok -- no bother about impredicativity in coercions, as they're -- inferred fast_check_co co | not (gopt Opt_DeferTypeErrors dflags) , badCoercionHoleCo co = MTVU_HoleBlocker -- Wrinkle (4b) in "GHC.Tc.Solver.Canonical" Note [Equalities with incompatible kinds] | tv `elemVarSet` tyCoVarsOfCo co = MTVU_Occurs | otherwise = ok bad_tc :: TyCon -> Bool bad_tc tc | not (impredicative_ok || isTauTyCon tc) = True | not (ty_fam_ok || isFamFreeTyCon tc) = True | otherwise = False canUnifyWithPolyType :: DynFlags -> TcTyVarDetails -> Bool canUnifyWithPolyType dflags details = case details of MetaTv { mtv_info = TyVarTv } -> False MetaTv { mtv_info = TauTv } -> xopt LangExt.ImpredicativeTypes dflags _other -> True -- We can have non-meta tyvars in given constraints