{- (c) The University of Glasgow 2006 (c) The AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1994-1998 Core-syntax unfoldings Unfoldings (which can travel across module boundaries) are in Core syntax (namely @CoreExpr@s). The type @Unfolding@ sits ``above'' simply-Core-expressions unfoldings, capturing ``higher-level'' things we know about a binding, usually things that the simplifier found out (e.g., ``it's a literal''). In the corner of a @CoreUnfolding@ unfolding, you will find, unsurprisingly, a Core expression. -} {-# LANGUAGE CPP #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-incomplete-record-updates #-} module GHC.Core.Unfold ( Unfolding, UnfoldingGuidance, -- Abstract types noUnfolding, mkUnfolding, mkCoreUnfolding, mkFinalUnfolding, mkSimpleUnfolding, mkWorkerUnfolding, mkInlineUnfolding, mkInlineUnfoldingWithArity, mkInlinableUnfolding, mkWwInlineRule, mkCompulsoryUnfolding, mkDFunUnfolding, specUnfolding, ArgSummary(..), couldBeSmallEnoughToInline, inlineBoringOk, certainlyWillInline, smallEnoughToInline, callSiteInline, CallCtxt(..), -- Reexport from GHC.Core.Subst (it only live there so it can be used -- by the Very Simple Optimiser) exprIsConApp_maybe, exprIsLiteral_maybe ) where #include "HsVersions.h" import GHC.Prelude import GHC.Driver.Session import GHC.Core import GHC.Core.Opt.OccurAnal ( occurAnalyseExpr ) import GHC.Core.SimpleOpt import GHC.Core.Opt.Arity ( manifestArity ) import GHC.Core.Utils import GHC.Types.Id import GHC.Types.Demand ( StrictSig, isDeadEndSig ) import GHC.Core.DataCon import GHC.Types.Literal import GHC.Builtin.PrimOps import GHC.Types.Id.Info import GHC.Types.Basic ( Arity, InlineSpec(..), inlinePragmaSpec ) import GHC.Core.Type import GHC.Builtin.Names import GHC.Builtin.Types.Prim ( realWorldStatePrimTy ) import GHC.Data.Bag import GHC.Utils.Misc import GHC.Utils.Outputable import GHC.Types.ForeignCall import GHC.Types.Name import GHC.Utils.Error import qualified Data.ByteString as BS import Data.List {- ************************************************************************ * * \subsection{Making unfoldings} * * ************************************************************************ -} mkFinalUnfolding :: DynFlags -> UnfoldingSource -> StrictSig -> CoreExpr -> Unfolding -- "Final" in the sense that this is a GlobalId that will not be further -- simplified; so the unfolding should be occurrence-analysed mkFinalUnfolding dflags src strict_sig expr = mkUnfolding dflags src True {- Top level -} (isDeadEndSig strict_sig) expr mkCompulsoryUnfolding :: CoreExpr -> Unfolding mkCompulsoryUnfolding expr -- Used for things that absolutely must be unfolded = mkCoreUnfolding InlineCompulsory True (simpleOptExpr unsafeGlobalDynFlags expr) (UnfWhen { ug_arity = 0 -- Arity of unfolding doesn't matter , ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk, ug_boring_ok = boringCxtOk }) -- Note [Top-level flag on inline rules] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Slight hack: note that mk_inline_rules conservatively sets the -- top-level flag to True. It gets set more accurately by the simplifier -- Simplify.simplUnfolding. mkSimpleUnfolding :: DynFlags -> CoreExpr -> Unfolding mkSimpleUnfolding dflags rhs = mkUnfolding dflags InlineRhs False False rhs mkDFunUnfolding :: [Var] -> DataCon -> [CoreExpr] -> Unfolding mkDFunUnfolding bndrs con ops = DFunUnfolding { df_bndrs = bndrs , df_con = con , df_args = map occurAnalyseExpr ops } -- See Note [Occurrence analysis of unfoldings] mkWwInlineRule :: DynFlags -> CoreExpr -> Arity -> Unfolding mkWwInlineRule dflags expr arity = mkCoreUnfolding InlineStable True (simpleOptExpr dflags expr) (UnfWhen { ug_arity = arity, ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk , ug_boring_ok = boringCxtNotOk }) mkWorkerUnfolding :: DynFlags -> (CoreExpr -> CoreExpr) -> Unfolding -> Unfolding -- See Note [Worker-wrapper for INLINABLE functions] in GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap mkWorkerUnfolding dflags work_fn (CoreUnfolding { uf_src = src, uf_tmpl = tmpl , uf_is_top = top_lvl }) | isStableSource src = mkCoreUnfolding src top_lvl new_tmpl guidance where new_tmpl = simpleOptExpr dflags (work_fn tmpl) guidance = calcUnfoldingGuidance dflags False new_tmpl mkWorkerUnfolding _ _ _ = noUnfolding -- | Make an unfolding that may be used unsaturated -- (ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk) and that is reported as having its -- manifest arity (the number of outer lambdas applications will -- resolve before doing any work). mkInlineUnfolding :: CoreExpr -> Unfolding mkInlineUnfolding expr = mkCoreUnfolding InlineStable True -- Note [Top-level flag on inline rules] expr' guide where expr' = simpleOptExpr unsafeGlobalDynFlags expr guide = UnfWhen { ug_arity = manifestArity expr' , ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk , ug_boring_ok = boring_ok } boring_ok = inlineBoringOk expr' -- | Make an unfolding that will be used once the RHS has been saturated -- to the given arity. mkInlineUnfoldingWithArity :: Arity -> CoreExpr -> Unfolding mkInlineUnfoldingWithArity arity expr = mkCoreUnfolding InlineStable True -- Note [Top-level flag on inline rules] expr' guide where expr' = simpleOptExpr unsafeGlobalDynFlags expr guide = UnfWhen { ug_arity = arity , ug_unsat_ok = needSaturated , ug_boring_ok = boring_ok } -- See Note [INLINE pragmas and boring contexts] as to why we need to look -- at the arity here. boring_ok | arity == 0 = True | otherwise = inlineBoringOk expr' mkInlinableUnfolding :: DynFlags -> CoreExpr -> Unfolding mkInlinableUnfolding dflags expr = mkUnfolding dflags InlineStable False False expr' where expr' = simpleOptExpr dflags expr specUnfolding :: DynFlags -> [Var] -> (CoreExpr -> CoreExpr) -> [CoreArg] -- LHS arguments in the RULE -> Unfolding -> Unfolding -- See Note [Specialising unfoldings] -- specUnfolding spec_bndrs spec_args unf -- = \spec_bndrs. unf spec_args -- specUnfolding dflags spec_bndrs spec_app rule_lhs_args df@(DFunUnfolding { df_bndrs = old_bndrs, df_con = con, df_args = args }) = ASSERT2( rule_lhs_args `equalLength` old_bndrs , ppr df $$ ppr rule_lhs_args ) -- For this ASSERT see Note [DFunUnfoldings] in GHC.Core.Opt.Specialise mkDFunUnfolding spec_bndrs con (map spec_arg args) -- For DFunUnfoldings we transform -- \obs. MkD <op1> ... <opn> -- to -- \sbs. MkD ((\obs. <op1>) spec_args) ... ditto <opn> where spec_arg arg = simpleOptExpr dflags $ spec_app (mkLams old_bndrs arg) -- The beta-redexes created by spec_app will be -- simplified away by simplOptExpr specUnfolding dflags spec_bndrs spec_app rule_lhs_args (CoreUnfolding { uf_src = src, uf_tmpl = tmpl , uf_is_top = top_lvl , uf_guidance = old_guidance }) | isStableSource src -- See Note [Specialising unfoldings] , UnfWhen { ug_arity = old_arity } <- old_guidance = mkCoreUnfolding src top_lvl new_tmpl (old_guidance { ug_arity = old_arity - arity_decrease }) where new_tmpl = simpleOptExpr dflags $ mkLams spec_bndrs $ spec_app tmpl -- The beta-redexes created by spec_app -- will besimplified away by simplOptExpr arity_decrease = count isValArg rule_lhs_args - count isId spec_bndrs specUnfolding _ _ _ _ _ = noUnfolding {- Note [Specialising unfoldings] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When we specialise a function for some given type-class arguments, we use specUnfolding to specialise its unfolding. Some important points: * If the original function has a DFunUnfolding, the specialised one must do so too! Otherwise we lose the magic rules that make it interact with ClassOps * There is a bit of hack for INLINABLE functions: f :: Ord a => .... f = <big-rhs> {- INLINABLE f #-} Now if we specialise f, should the specialised version still have an INLINABLE pragma? If it does, we'll capture a specialised copy of <big-rhs> as its unfolding, and that probably won't inline. But if we don't, the specialised version of <big-rhs> might be small enough to inline at a call site. This happens with Control.Monad.liftM3, and can cause a lot more allocation as a result (nofib n-body shows this). Moreover, keeping the INLINABLE thing isn't much help, because the specialised function (probably) isn't overloaded any more. Conclusion: drop the INLINEALE pragma. In practice what this means is: if a stable unfolding has UnfoldingGuidance of UnfWhen, we keep it (so the specialised thing too will always inline) if a stable unfolding has UnfoldingGuidance of UnfIfGoodArgs (which arises from INLINABLE), we discard it Note [Honour INLINE on 0-ary bindings] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider x = <expensive> {-# INLINE x #-} f y = ...x... The semantics of an INLINE pragma is inline x at every call site, provided it is saturated; that is, applied to at least as many arguments as appear on the LHS of the Haskell source definition. (This source-code-derived arity is stored in the `ug_arity` field of the `UnfoldingGuidance`.) In the example, x's ug_arity is 0, so we should inline it at every use site. It's rare to have such an INLINE pragma (usually INLINE Is on functions), but it's occasionally very important (#15578, #15519). In #15519 we had something like x = case (g a b) of I# r -> T r {-# INLINE x #-} f y = ...(h x).... where h is strict. So we got f y = ...(case g a b of I# r -> h (T r))... and that in turn allowed SpecConstr to ramp up performance. How do we deliver on this? By adjusting the ug_boring_ok flag in mkInlineUnfoldingWithArity; see Note [INLINE pragmas and boring contexts] NB: there is a real risk that full laziness will float it right back out again. Consider again x = factorial 200 {-# INLINE x #-} f y = ...x... After inlining we get f y = ...(factorial 200)... but it's entirely possible that full laziness will do lvl23 = factorial 200 f y = ...lvl23... That's a problem for another day. Note [INLINE pragmas and boring contexts] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An INLINE pragma uses mkInlineUnfoldingWithArity to build the unfolding. That sets the ug_boring_ok flag to False if the function is not tiny (inlineBoringOK), so that even INLINE functions are not inlined in an utterly boring context. E.g. \x y. Just (f y x) Nothing is gained by inlining f here, even if it has an INLINE pragma. But for 0-ary bindings, we want to inline regardless; see Note [Honour INLINE on 0-ary bindings]. I'm a bit worried that it's possible for the same kind of problem to arise for non-0-ary functions too, but let's wait and see. -} mkUnfolding :: DynFlags -> UnfoldingSource -> Bool -- Is top-level -> Bool -- Definitely a bottoming binding -- (only relevant for top-level bindings) -> CoreExpr -> Unfolding -- Calculates unfolding guidance -- Occurrence-analyses the expression before capturing it mkUnfolding dflags src top_lvl is_bottoming expr = mkCoreUnfolding src top_lvl expr guidance where is_top_bottoming = top_lvl && is_bottoming guidance = calcUnfoldingGuidance dflags is_top_bottoming expr -- NB: *not* (calcUnfoldingGuidance (occurAnalyseExpr expr))! -- See Note [Calculate unfolding guidance on the non-occ-anal'd expression] mkCoreUnfolding :: UnfoldingSource -> Bool -> CoreExpr -> UnfoldingGuidance -> Unfolding -- Occurrence-analyses the expression before capturing it mkCoreUnfolding src top_lvl expr guidance = CoreUnfolding { uf_tmpl = occurAnalyseExpr expr, -- See Note [Occurrence analysis of unfoldings] uf_src = src, uf_is_top = top_lvl, uf_is_value = exprIsHNF expr, uf_is_conlike = exprIsConLike expr, uf_is_work_free = exprIsWorkFree expr, uf_expandable = exprIsExpandable expr, uf_guidance = guidance } {- Note [Occurrence analysis of unfoldings] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We do occurrence-analysis of unfoldings once and for all, when the unfolding is built, rather than each time we inline them. But given this decision it's vital that we do *always* do it. Consider this unfolding \x -> letrec { f = ...g...; g* = f } in body where g* is (for some strange reason) the loop breaker. If we don't occ-anal it when reading it in, we won't mark g as a loop breaker, and we may inline g entirely in body, dropping its binding, and leaving the occurrence in f out of scope. This happened in #8892, where the unfolding in question was a DFun unfolding. But more generally, the simplifier is designed on the basis that it is looking at occurrence-analysed expressions, so better ensure that they actually are. Note [Calculate unfolding guidance on the non-occ-anal'd expression] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Notice that we give the non-occur-analysed expression to calcUnfoldingGuidance. In some ways it'd be better to occur-analyse first; for example, sometimes during simplification, there's a large let-bound thing which has been substituted, and so is now dead; so 'expr' contains two copies of the thing while the occurrence-analysed expression doesn't. Nevertheless, we *don't* and *must not* occ-analyse before computing the size because a) The size computation bales out after a while, whereas occurrence analysis does not. b) Residency increases sharply if you occ-anal first. I'm not 100% sure why, but it's a large effect. Compiling Cabal went from residency of 534M to over 800M with this one change. This can occasionally mean that the guidance is very pessimistic; it gets fixed up next round. And it should be rare, because large let-bound things that are dead are usually caught by preInlineUnconditionally ************************************************************************ * * \subsection{The UnfoldingGuidance type} * * ************************************************************************ -} inlineBoringOk :: CoreExpr -> Bool -- See Note [INLINE for small functions] -- True => the result of inlining the expression is -- no bigger than the expression itself -- eg (\x y -> f y x) -- This is a quick and dirty version. It doesn't attempt -- to deal with (\x y z -> x (y z)) -- The really important one is (x `cast` c) inlineBoringOk e = go 0 e where go :: Int -> CoreExpr -> Bool go credit (Lam x e) | isId x = go (credit+1) e | otherwise = go credit e -- See Note [Count coercion arguments in boring contexts] go credit (App f (Type {})) = go credit f go credit (App f a) | credit > 0 , exprIsTrivial a = go (credit-1) f go credit (Tick _ e) = go credit e -- dubious go credit (Cast e _) = go credit e go credit (Case scrut _ _ [(_,_,rhs)]) -- See Note [Inline unsafeCoerce] | isUnsafeEqualityProof scrut = go credit rhs go _ (Var {}) = boringCxtOk go _ _ = boringCxtNotOk calcUnfoldingGuidance :: DynFlags -> Bool -- Definitely a top-level, bottoming binding -> CoreExpr -- Expression to look at -> UnfoldingGuidance calcUnfoldingGuidance dflags is_top_bottoming (Tick t expr) | not (tickishIsCode t) -- non-code ticks don't matter for unfolding = calcUnfoldingGuidance dflags is_top_bottoming expr calcUnfoldingGuidance dflags is_top_bottoming expr = case sizeExpr dflags bOMB_OUT_SIZE val_bndrs body of TooBig -> UnfNever SizeIs size cased_bndrs scrut_discount | uncondInline expr n_val_bndrs size -> UnfWhen { ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk , ug_boring_ok = boringCxtOk , ug_arity = n_val_bndrs } -- Note [INLINE for small functions] | is_top_bottoming -> UnfNever -- See Note [Do not inline top-level bottoming functions] | otherwise -> UnfIfGoodArgs { ug_args = map (mk_discount cased_bndrs) val_bndrs , ug_size = size , ug_res = scrut_discount } where (bndrs, body) = collectBinders expr bOMB_OUT_SIZE = ufCreationThreshold dflags -- Bomb out if size gets bigger than this val_bndrs = filter isId bndrs n_val_bndrs = length val_bndrs mk_discount :: Bag (Id,Int) -> Id -> Int mk_discount cbs bndr = foldl' combine 0 cbs where combine acc (bndr', disc) | bndr == bndr' = acc `plus_disc` disc | otherwise = acc plus_disc :: Int -> Int -> Int plus_disc | isFunTy (idType bndr) = max | otherwise = (+) -- See Note [Function and non-function discounts] {- Note [Inline unsafeCoerce] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We really want to inline unsafeCoerce, even when applied to boring arguments. It doesn't look as if its RHS is smaller than the call unsafeCoerce x = case unsafeEqualityProof @a @b of UnsafeRefl -> x but that case is discarded -- see Note [Implementing unsafeCoerce] in base:Unsafe.Coerce. Moreover, if we /don't/ inline it, we may be left with f (unsafeCoerce x) which will build a thunk -- bad, bad, bad. Conclusion: we really want inlineBoringOk to be True of the RHS of unsafeCoerce. This is (U4a) in Note [Implementing unsafeCoerce]. Note [Computing the size of an expression] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The basic idea of sizeExpr is obvious enough: count nodes. But getting the heuristics right has taken a long time. Here's the basic strategy: * Variables, literals: 0 (Exception for string literals, see litSize.) * Function applications (f e1 .. en): 1 + #value args * Constructor applications: 1, regardless of #args * Let(rec): 1 + size of components * Note, cast: 0 Examples Size Term -------------- 0 42# 0 x 0 True 2 f x 1 Just x 4 f (g x) Notice that 'x' counts 0, while (f x) counts 2. That's deliberate: there's a function call to account for. Notice also that constructor applications are very cheap, because exposing them to a caller is so valuable. [25/5/11] All sizes are now multiplied by 10, except for primops (which have sizes like 1 or 4. This makes primops look fantastically cheap, and seems to be almost universally beneficial. Done partly as a result of #4978. Note [Do not inline top-level bottoming functions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The FloatOut pass has gone to some trouble to float out calls to 'error' and similar friends. See Note [Bottoming floats] in GHC.Core.Opt.SetLevels. Do not re-inline them! But we *do* still inline if they are very small (the uncondInline stuff). Note [INLINE for small functions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider {-# INLINE f #-} f x = Just x g y = f y Then f's RHS is no larger than its LHS, so we should inline it into even the most boring context. In general, f the function is sufficiently small that its body is as small as the call itself, the inline unconditionally, regardless of how boring the context is. Things to note: (1) We inline *unconditionally* if inlined thing is smaller (using sizeExpr) than the thing it's replacing. Notice that (f x) --> (g 3) -- YES, unconditionally (f x) --> x : [] -- YES, *even though* there are two -- arguments to the cons x --> g 3 -- NO x --> Just v -- NO It's very important not to unconditionally replace a variable by a non-atomic term. (2) We do this even if the thing isn't saturated, else we end up with the silly situation that f x y = x ...map (f 3)... doesn't inline. Even in a boring context, inlining without being saturated will give a lambda instead of a PAP, and will be more efficient at runtime. (3) However, when the function's arity > 0, we do insist that it has at least one value argument at the call site. (This check is made in the UnfWhen case of callSiteInline.) Otherwise we find this: f = /\a \x:a. x d = /\b. MkD (f b) If we inline f here we get d = /\b. MkD (\x:b. x) and then prepareRhs floats out the argument, abstracting the type variables, so we end up with the original again! (4) We must be much more cautious about arity-zero things. Consider let x = y +# z in ... In *size* terms primops look very small, because the generate a single instruction, but we do not want to unconditionally replace every occurrence of x with (y +# z). So we only do the unconditional-inline thing for *trivial* expressions. NB: you might think that PostInlineUnconditionally would do this but it doesn't fire for top-level things; see GHC.Core.Opt.Simplify.Utils Note [Top level and postInlineUnconditionally] Note [Count coercion arguments in boring contexts] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In inlineBoringOK, we ignore type arguments when deciding whether an expression is okay to inline into boring contexts. This is good, since if we have a definition like let y = x @Int in f y y there’s no reason not to inline y at both use sites — no work is actually duplicated. It may seem like the same reasoning applies to coercion arguments, and indeed, in #17182 we changed inlineBoringOK to treat coercions the same way. However, this isn’t a good idea: unlike type arguments, which have no runtime representation, coercion arguments *do* have a runtime representation (albeit the zero-width VoidRep, see Note [Coercion tokens] in "GHC.CoreToStg"). This caused trouble in #17787 for DataCon wrappers for nullary GADT constructors: the wrappers would be inlined and each use of the constructor would lead to a separate allocation instead of just sharing the wrapper closure. The solution: don’t ignore coercion arguments after all. -} uncondInline :: CoreExpr -> Arity -> Int -> Bool -- Inline unconditionally if there no size increase -- Size of call is arity (+1 for the function) -- See Note [INLINE for small functions] uncondInline rhs arity size | arity > 0 = size <= 10 * (arity + 1) -- See Note [INLINE for small functions] (1) | otherwise = exprIsTrivial rhs -- See Note [INLINE for small functions] (4) sizeExpr :: DynFlags -> Int -- Bomb out if it gets bigger than this -> [Id] -- Arguments; we're interested in which of these -- get case'd -> CoreExpr -> ExprSize -- Note [Computing the size of an expression] sizeExpr dflags bOMB_OUT_SIZE top_args expr = size_up expr where size_up (Cast e _) = size_up e size_up (Tick _ e) = size_up e size_up (Type _) = sizeZero -- Types cost nothing size_up (Coercion _) = sizeZero size_up (Lit lit) = sizeN (litSize lit) size_up (Var f) | isRealWorldId f = sizeZero -- Make sure we get constructor discounts even -- on nullary constructors | otherwise = size_up_call f [] 0 size_up (App fun arg) | isTyCoArg arg = size_up fun | otherwise = size_up arg `addSizeNSD` size_up_app fun [arg] (if isRealWorldExpr arg then 1 else 0) size_up (Lam b e) | isId b && not (isRealWorldId b) = lamScrutDiscount dflags (size_up e `addSizeN` 10) | otherwise = size_up e size_up (Let (NonRec binder rhs) body) = size_up_rhs (binder, rhs) `addSizeNSD` size_up body `addSizeN` size_up_alloc binder size_up (Let (Rec pairs) body) = foldr (addSizeNSD . size_up_rhs) (size_up body `addSizeN` sum (map (size_up_alloc . fst) pairs)) pairs size_up (Case e _ _ alts) | null alts = size_up e -- case e of {} never returns, so take size of scrutinee size_up (Case e _ _ alts) -- Now alts is non-empty | Just v <- is_top_arg e -- We are scrutinising an argument variable = let alt_sizes = map size_up_alt alts -- alts_size tries to compute a good discount for -- the case when we are scrutinising an argument variable alts_size (SizeIs tot tot_disc tot_scrut) -- Size of all alternatives (SizeIs max _ _) -- Size of biggest alternative = SizeIs tot (unitBag (v, 20 + tot - max) `unionBags` tot_disc) tot_scrut -- If the variable is known, we produce a -- discount that will take us back to 'max', -- the size of the largest alternative The -- 1+ is a little discount for reduced -- allocation in the caller -- -- Notice though, that we return tot_disc, -- the total discount from all branches. I -- think that's right. alts_size tot_size _ = tot_size in alts_size (foldr1 addAltSize alt_sizes) -- alts is non-empty (foldr1 maxSize alt_sizes) -- Good to inline if an arg is scrutinised, because -- that may eliminate allocation in the caller -- And it eliminates the case itself where is_top_arg (Var v) | v `elem` top_args = Just v is_top_arg (Cast e _) = is_top_arg e is_top_arg _ = Nothing size_up (Case e _ _ alts) = size_up e `addSizeNSD` foldr (addAltSize . size_up_alt) case_size alts where case_size | is_inline_scrut e, lengthAtMost alts 1 = sizeN (-10) | otherwise = sizeZero -- Normally we don't charge for the case itself, but -- we charge one per alternative (see size_up_alt, -- below) to account for the cost of the info table -- and comparisons. -- -- However, in certain cases (see is_inline_scrut -- below), no code is generated for the case unless -- there are multiple alts. In these cases we -- subtract one, making the first alt free. -- e.g. case x# +# y# of _ -> ... should cost 1 -- case touch# x# of _ -> ... should cost 0 -- (see #4978) -- -- I would like to not have the "lengthAtMost alts 1" -- condition above, but without that some programs got worse -- (spectral/hartel/event and spectral/para). I don't fully -- understand why. (SDM 24/5/11) -- unboxed variables, inline primops and unsafe foreign calls -- are all "inline" things: is_inline_scrut (Var v) = isUnliftedType (idType v) is_inline_scrut scrut | (Var f, _) <- collectArgs scrut = case idDetails f of FCallId fc -> not (isSafeForeignCall fc) PrimOpId op -> not (primOpOutOfLine op) _other -> False | otherwise = False size_up_rhs (bndr, rhs) | Just join_arity <- isJoinId_maybe bndr -- Skip arguments to join point , (_bndrs, body) <- collectNBinders join_arity rhs = size_up body | otherwise = size_up rhs ------------ -- size_up_app is used when there's ONE OR MORE value args size_up_app (App fun arg) args voids | isTyCoArg arg = size_up_app fun args voids | isRealWorldExpr arg = size_up_app fun (arg:args) (voids + 1) | otherwise = size_up arg `addSizeNSD` size_up_app fun (arg:args) voids size_up_app (Var fun) args voids = size_up_call fun args voids size_up_app (Tick _ expr) args voids = size_up_app expr args voids size_up_app (Cast expr _) args voids = size_up_app expr args voids size_up_app other args voids = size_up other `addSizeN` callSize (length args) voids -- if the lhs is not an App or a Var, or an invisible thing like a -- Tick or Cast, then we should charge for a complete call plus the -- size of the lhs itself. ------------ size_up_call :: Id -> [CoreExpr] -> Int -> ExprSize size_up_call fun val_args voids = case idDetails fun of FCallId _ -> sizeN (callSize (length val_args) voids) DataConWorkId dc -> conSize dc (length val_args) PrimOpId op -> primOpSize op (length val_args) ClassOpId _ -> classOpSize dflags top_args val_args _ -> funSize dflags top_args fun (length val_args) voids ------------ size_up_alt (_con, _bndrs, rhs) = size_up rhs `addSizeN` 10 -- Don't charge for args, so that wrappers look cheap -- (See comments about wrappers with Case) -- -- IMPORTANT: *do* charge 1 for the alternative, else we -- find that giant case nests are treated as practically free -- A good example is Foreign.C.Error.errnoToIOError ------------ -- Cost to allocate binding with given binder size_up_alloc bndr | isTyVar bndr -- Doesn't exist at runtime || isJoinId bndr -- Not allocated at all || isUnliftedType (idType bndr) -- Doesn't live in heap = 0 | otherwise = 10 ------------ -- These addSize things have to be here because -- I don't want to give them bOMB_OUT_SIZE as an argument addSizeN TooBig _ = TooBig addSizeN (SizeIs n xs d) m = mkSizeIs bOMB_OUT_SIZE (n + m) xs d -- addAltSize is used to add the sizes of case alternatives addAltSize TooBig _ = TooBig addAltSize _ TooBig = TooBig addAltSize (SizeIs n1 xs d1) (SizeIs n2 ys d2) = mkSizeIs bOMB_OUT_SIZE (n1 + n2) (xs `unionBags` ys) (d1 + d2) -- Note [addAltSize result discounts] -- This variant ignores the result discount from its LEFT argument -- It's used when the second argument isn't part of the result addSizeNSD TooBig _ = TooBig addSizeNSD _ TooBig = TooBig addSizeNSD (SizeIs n1 xs _) (SizeIs n2 ys d2) = mkSizeIs bOMB_OUT_SIZE (n1 + n2) (xs `unionBags` ys) d2 -- Ignore d1 isRealWorldId id = idType id `eqType` realWorldStatePrimTy -- an expression of type State# RealWorld must be a variable isRealWorldExpr (Var id) = isRealWorldId id isRealWorldExpr (Tick _ e) = isRealWorldExpr e isRealWorldExpr _ = False -- | Finds a nominal size of a string literal. litSize :: Literal -> Int -- Used by GHC.Core.Unfold.sizeExpr litSize (LitNumber LitNumInteger _) = 100 -- Note [Size of literal integers] litSize (LitNumber LitNumNatural _) = 100 litSize (LitString str) = 10 + 10 * ((BS.length str + 3) `div` 4) -- If size could be 0 then @f "x"@ might be too small -- [Sept03: make literal strings a bit bigger to avoid fruitless -- duplication of little strings] litSize _other = 0 -- Must match size of nullary constructors -- Key point: if x |-> 4, then x must inline unconditionally -- (eg via case binding) classOpSize :: DynFlags -> [Id] -> [CoreExpr] -> ExprSize -- See Note [Conlike is interesting] classOpSize _ _ [] = sizeZero classOpSize dflags top_args (arg1 : other_args) = SizeIs size arg_discount 0 where size = 20 + (10 * length other_args) -- If the class op is scrutinising a lambda bound dictionary then -- give it a discount, to encourage the inlining of this function -- The actual discount is rather arbitrarily chosen arg_discount = case arg1 of Var dict | dict `elem` top_args -> unitBag (dict, ufDictDiscount dflags) _other -> emptyBag -- | The size of a function call callSize :: Int -- ^ number of value args -> Int -- ^ number of value args that are void -> Int callSize n_val_args voids = 10 * (1 + n_val_args - voids) -- The 1+ is for the function itself -- Add 1 for each non-trivial arg; -- the allocation cost, as in let(rec) -- | The size of a jump to a join point jumpSize :: Int -- ^ number of value args -> Int -- ^ number of value args that are void -> Int jumpSize n_val_args voids = 2 * (1 + n_val_args - voids) -- A jump is 20% the size of a function call. Making jumps free reopens -- bug #6048, but making them any more expensive loses a 21% improvement in -- spectral/puzzle. TODO Perhaps adjusting the default threshold would be a -- better solution? funSize :: DynFlags -> [Id] -> Id -> Int -> Int -> ExprSize -- Size for functions that are not constructors or primops -- Note [Function applications] funSize dflags top_args fun n_val_args voids | fun `hasKey` buildIdKey = buildSize | fun `hasKey` augmentIdKey = augmentSize | otherwise = SizeIs size arg_discount res_discount where some_val_args = n_val_args > 0 is_join = isJoinId fun size | is_join = jumpSize n_val_args voids | not some_val_args = 0 | otherwise = callSize n_val_args voids -- DISCOUNTS -- See Note [Function and non-function discounts] arg_discount | some_val_args && fun `elem` top_args = unitBag (fun, ufFunAppDiscount dflags) | otherwise = emptyBag -- If the function is an argument and is applied -- to some values, give it an arg-discount res_discount | idArity fun > n_val_args = ufFunAppDiscount dflags | otherwise = 0 -- If the function is partially applied, show a result discount -- XXX maybe behave like ConSize for eval'd variable conSize :: DataCon -> Int -> ExprSize conSize dc n_val_args | n_val_args == 0 = SizeIs 0 emptyBag 10 -- Like variables -- See Note [Unboxed tuple size and result discount] | isUnboxedTupleCon dc = SizeIs 0 emptyBag 10 -- See Note [Constructor size and result discount] | otherwise = SizeIs 10 emptyBag 10 {- Note [Constructor size and result discount] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Treat a constructors application as size 10, regardless of how many arguments it has; we are keen to expose them (and we charge separately for their args). We can't treat them as size zero, else we find that (Just x) has size 0, which is the same as a lone variable; and hence 'v' will always be replaced by (Just x), where v is bound to Just x. The "result discount" is applied if the result of the call is scrutinised (say by a case). For a constructor application that will mean the constructor application will disappear, so we don't need to charge it to the function. So the discount should at least match the cost of the constructor application, namely 10. Historical note 1: Until Jun 2020 we gave it a "bit of extra incentive" via a discount of 10*(1 + n_val_args), but that was FAR too much (#18282). In particular, consider a huge case tree like let r = case y1 of Nothing -> B1 a b c Just v1 -> case y2 of Nothing -> B1 c b a Just v2 -> ... If conSize gives a cost of 10 (regardless of n_val_args) and a discount of 10, that'll make each alternative RHS cost zero. We charge 10 for each case alternative (see size_up_alt). If we give a bigger discount (say 20) in conSize, we'll make the case expression cost *nothing*, and that can make a huge case tree cost nothing. This leads to massive, sometimes exponenial inlinings (#18282). In short, don't give a discount that give a negative size to a sub-expression! Historical note 2: Much longer ago, Simon M tried a MUCH bigger discount: (10 * (10 + n_val_args)), and said it was an "unambiguous win", but its terribly dangerous because a function with many many case branches, each finishing with a constructor, can have an arbitrarily large discount. This led to terrible code bloat: see #6099. Note [Unboxed tuple size and result discount] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ However, unboxed tuples count as size zero. I found occasions where we had f x y z = case op# x y z of { s -> (# s, () #) } and f wasn't getting inlined. I tried giving unboxed tuples a *result discount* of zero (see the commented-out line). Why? When returned as a result they do not allocate, so maybe we don't want to charge so much for them. If you have a non-zero discount here, we find that workers often get inlined back into wrappers, because it look like f x = case $wf x of (# a,b #) -> (a,b) and we are keener because of the case. However while this change shrank binary sizes by 0.5% it also made spectral/boyer allocate 5% more. All other changes were very small. So it's not a big deal but I didn't adopt the idea. When fixing #18282 (see Note [Constructor size and result discount]) I changed the result discount to be just 10, not 10*(1+n_val_args). Note [Function and non-function discounts] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We want a discount if the function is applied. A good example is monadic combinators with continuation arguments, where inlining is quite important. But we don't want a big discount when a function is called many times (see the detailed comments with #6048) because if the function is big it won't be inlined at its many call sites and no benefit results. Indeed, we can get exponentially big inlinings this way; that is what #6048 is about. On the other hand, for data-valued arguments, if there are lots of case expressions in the body, each one will get smaller if we apply the function to a constructor application, so we *want* a big discount if the argument is scrutinised by many case expressions. Conclusion: - For functions, take the max of the discounts - For data values, take the sum of the discounts Note [Literal integer size] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Literal integers *can* be big (mkInteger [...coefficients...]), but need not be (IS n). We just use an arbitrary big-ish constant here so that, in particular, we don't inline top-level defns like n = IS 5 There's no point in doing so -- any optimisations will see the IS through n's unfolding. Nor will a big size inhibit unfoldings functions that mention a literal Integer, because the float-out pass will float all those constants to top level. -} primOpSize :: PrimOp -> Int -> ExprSize primOpSize op n_val_args = if primOpOutOfLine op then sizeN (op_size + n_val_args) else sizeN op_size where op_size = primOpCodeSize op buildSize :: ExprSize buildSize = SizeIs 0 emptyBag 40 -- We really want to inline applications of build -- build t (\cn -> e) should cost only the cost of e (because build will be inlined later) -- Indeed, we should add a result_discount because build is -- very like a constructor. We don't bother to check that the -- build is saturated (it usually is). The "-2" discounts for the \c n, -- The "4" is rather arbitrary. augmentSize :: ExprSize augmentSize = SizeIs 0 emptyBag 40 -- Ditto (augment t (\cn -> e) ys) should cost only the cost of -- e plus ys. The -2 accounts for the \cn -- When we return a lambda, give a discount if it's used (applied) lamScrutDiscount :: DynFlags -> ExprSize -> ExprSize lamScrutDiscount dflags (SizeIs n vs _) = SizeIs n vs (ufFunAppDiscount dflags) lamScrutDiscount _ TooBig = TooBig {- Note [addAltSize result discounts] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When adding the size of alternatives, we *add* the result discounts too, rather than take the *maximum*. For a multi-branch case, this gives a discount for each branch that returns a constructor, making us keener to inline. I did try using 'max' instead, but it makes nofib 'rewrite' and 'puzzle' allocate significantly more, and didn't make binary sizes shrink significantly either. Note [Discounts and thresholds] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Constants for discounts and thesholds are defined in "GHC.Driver.Session", all of form ufXxxx. They are: ufCreationThreshold At a definition site, if the unfolding is bigger than this, we may discard it altogether ufUseThreshold At a call site, if the unfolding, less discounts, is smaller than this, then it's small enough inline ufDictDiscount The discount for each occurrence of a dictionary argument as an argument of a class method. Should be pretty small else big functions may get inlined ufFunAppDiscount Discount for a function argument that is applied. Quite large, because if we inline we avoid the higher-order call. ufDearOp The size of a foreign call or not-dupable PrimOp ufVeryAggressive If True, the compiler ignores all the thresholds and inlines very aggressively. It still adheres to arity, simplifier phase control and loop breakers. Historical Note: Before April 2020 we had another factor, ufKeenessFactor, which would scale the discounts before they were subtracted from the size. This was justified with the following comment: -- We multiply the raw discounts (args_discount and result_discount) -- ty opt_UnfoldingKeenessFactor because the former have to do with -- *size* whereas the discounts imply that there's some extra -- *efficiency* to be gained (e.g. beta reductions, case reductions) -- by inlining. However, this is highly suspect since it means that we subtract a *scaled* size from an absolute size, resulting in crazy (e.g. negative) scores in some cases (#15304). We consequently killed off ufKeenessFactor and bumped up the ufUseThreshold to compensate. Note [Function applications] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In a function application (f a b) - If 'f' is an argument to the function being analysed, and there's at least one value arg, record a FunAppDiscount for f - If the application if a PAP (arity > 2 in this example) record a *result* discount (because inlining with "extra" args in the call may mean that we now get a saturated application) Code for manipulating sizes -} -- | The size of a candidate expression for unfolding data ExprSize = TooBig | SizeIs { _es_size_is :: {-# UNPACK #-} !Int -- ^ Size found , _es_args :: !(Bag (Id,Int)) -- ^ Arguments cased herein, and discount for each such , _es_discount :: {-# UNPACK #-} !Int -- ^ Size to subtract if result is scrutinised by a case -- expression } instance Outputable ExprSize where ppr TooBig = text "TooBig" ppr (SizeIs a _ c) = brackets (int a <+> int c) -- subtract the discount before deciding whether to bale out. eg. we -- want to inline a large constructor application into a selector: -- tup = (a_1, ..., a_99) -- x = case tup of ... -- mkSizeIs :: Int -> Int -> Bag (Id, Int) -> Int -> ExprSize mkSizeIs max n xs d | (n - d) > max = TooBig | otherwise = SizeIs n xs d maxSize :: ExprSize -> ExprSize -> ExprSize maxSize TooBig _ = TooBig maxSize _ TooBig = TooBig maxSize s1@(SizeIs n1 _ _) s2@(SizeIs n2 _ _) | n1 > n2 = s1 | otherwise = s2 sizeZero :: ExprSize sizeN :: Int -> ExprSize sizeZero = SizeIs 0 emptyBag 0 sizeN n = SizeIs n emptyBag 0 {- ************************************************************************ * * \subsection[considerUnfolding]{Given all the info, do (not) do the unfolding} * * ************************************************************************ We use 'couldBeSmallEnoughToInline' to avoid exporting inlinings that we ``couldn't possibly use'' on the other side. Can be overridden w/ flaggery. Just the same as smallEnoughToInline, except that it has no actual arguments. -} couldBeSmallEnoughToInline :: DynFlags -> Int -> CoreExpr -> Bool couldBeSmallEnoughToInline dflags threshold rhs = case sizeExpr dflags threshold [] body of TooBig -> False _ -> True where (_, body) = collectBinders rhs ---------------- smallEnoughToInline :: DynFlags -> Unfolding -> Bool smallEnoughToInline dflags (CoreUnfolding {uf_guidance = UnfIfGoodArgs {ug_size = size}}) = size <= ufUseThreshold dflags smallEnoughToInline _ _ = False ---------------- certainlyWillInline :: DynFlags -> IdInfo -> Maybe Unfolding -- ^ Sees if the unfolding is pretty certain to inline. -- If so, return a *stable* unfolding for it, that will always inline. certainlyWillInline dflags fn_info = case unfoldingInfo fn_info of CoreUnfolding { uf_tmpl = e, uf_guidance = g } | loop_breaker -> Nothing -- Won't inline, so try w/w | noinline -> Nothing -- See Note [Worker-wrapper for NOINLINE functions] | otherwise -> do_cunf e g -- Depends on size, so look at that DFunUnfolding {} -> Just fn_unf -- Don't w/w DFuns; it never makes sense -- to do so, and even if it is currently a -- loop breaker, it may not be later _other_unf -> Nothing where loop_breaker = isStrongLoopBreaker (occInfo fn_info) noinline = inlinePragmaSpec (inlinePragInfo fn_info) == NoInline fn_unf = unfoldingInfo fn_info do_cunf :: CoreExpr -> UnfoldingGuidance -> Maybe Unfolding do_cunf _ UnfNever = Nothing do_cunf _ (UnfWhen {}) = Just (fn_unf { uf_src = InlineStable }) -- INLINE functions have UnfWhen -- The UnfIfGoodArgs case seems important. If we w/w small functions -- binary sizes go up by 10%! (This is with SplitObjs.) -- I'm not totally sure why. -- INLINABLE functions come via this path -- See Note [certainlyWillInline: INLINABLE] do_cunf expr (UnfIfGoodArgs { ug_size = size, ug_args = args }) | arityInfo fn_info > 0 -- See Note [certainlyWillInline: be careful of thunks] , not (isDeadEndSig (strictnessInfo fn_info)) -- Do not unconditionally inline a bottoming functions even if -- it seems smallish. We've carefully lifted it out to top level, -- so we don't want to re-inline it. , let unf_arity = length args , size - (10 * (unf_arity + 1)) <= ufUseThreshold dflags = Just (fn_unf { uf_src = InlineStable , uf_guidance = UnfWhen { ug_arity = unf_arity , ug_unsat_ok = unSaturatedOk , ug_boring_ok = inlineBoringOk expr } }) -- Note the "unsaturatedOk". A function like f = \ab. a -- will certainly inline, even if partially applied (f e), so we'd -- better make sure that the transformed inlining has the same property | otherwise = Nothing {- Note [certainlyWillInline: be careful of thunks] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Don't claim that thunks will certainly inline, because that risks work duplication. Even if the work duplication is not great (eg is_cheap holds), it can make a big difference in an inner loop In #5623 we found that the WorkWrap phase thought that y = case x of F# v -> F# (v +# v) was certainlyWillInline, so the addition got duplicated. Note that we check arityInfo instead of the arity of the unfolding to detect this case. This is so that we don't accidentally fail to inline small partial applications, like `f = g 42` (where `g` recurses into `f`) where g has arity 2 (say). Here there is no risk of work duplication, and the RHS is tiny, so certainlyWillInline should return True. But `unf_arity` is zero! However f's arity, gotten from `arityInfo fn_info`, is 1. Failing to say that `f` will inline forces W/W to generate a potentially huge worker for f that will immediately cancel with `g`'s wrapper anyway, causing unnecessary churn in the Simplifier while arriving at the same result. Note [certainlyWillInline: INLINABLE] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ certainlyWillInline /must/ return Nothing for a large INLINABLE thing, even though we have a stable inlining, so that strictness w/w takes place. It makes a big difference to efficiency, and the w/w pass knows how to transfer the INLINABLE info to the worker; see WorkWrap Note [Worker-wrapper for INLINABLE functions] ************************************************************************ * * \subsection{callSiteInline} * * ************************************************************************ This is the key function. It decides whether to inline a variable at a call site callSiteInline is used at call sites, so it is a bit more generous. It's a very important function that embodies lots of heuristics. A non-WHNF can be inlined if it doesn't occur inside a lambda, and occurs exactly once or occurs once in each branch of a case and is small If the thing is in WHNF, there's no danger of duplicating work, so we can inline if it occurs once, or is small NOTE: we don't want to inline top-level functions that always diverge. It just makes the code bigger. Tt turns out that the convenient way to prevent them inlining is to give them a NOINLINE pragma, which we do in StrictAnal.addStrictnessInfoToTopId -} callSiteInline :: DynFlags -> Id -- The Id -> Bool -- True <=> unfolding is active -> Bool -- True if there are no arguments at all (incl type args) -> [ArgSummary] -- One for each value arg; True if it is interesting -> CallCtxt -- True <=> continuation is interesting -> Maybe CoreExpr -- Unfolding, if any data ArgSummary = TrivArg -- Nothing interesting | NonTrivArg -- Arg has structure | ValueArg -- Arg is a con-app or PAP -- ..or con-like. Note [Conlike is interesting] instance Outputable ArgSummary where ppr TrivArg = text "TrivArg" ppr NonTrivArg = text "NonTrivArg" ppr ValueArg = text "ValueArg" nonTriv :: ArgSummary -> Bool nonTriv TrivArg = False nonTriv _ = True data CallCtxt = BoringCtxt | RhsCtxt -- Rhs of a let-binding; see Note [RHS of lets] | DiscArgCtxt -- Argument of a function with non-zero arg discount | RuleArgCtxt -- We are somewhere in the argument of a function with rules | ValAppCtxt -- We're applied to at least one value arg -- This arises when we have ((f x |> co) y) -- Then the (f x) has argument 'x' but in a ValAppCtxt | CaseCtxt -- We're the scrutinee of a case -- that decomposes its scrutinee instance Outputable CallCtxt where ppr CaseCtxt = text "CaseCtxt" ppr ValAppCtxt = text "ValAppCtxt" ppr BoringCtxt = text "BoringCtxt" ppr RhsCtxt = text "RhsCtxt" ppr DiscArgCtxt = text "DiscArgCtxt" ppr RuleArgCtxt = text "RuleArgCtxt" callSiteInline dflags id active_unfolding lone_variable arg_infos cont_info = case idUnfolding id of -- idUnfolding checks for loop-breakers, returning NoUnfolding -- Things with an INLINE pragma may have an unfolding *and* -- be a loop breaker (maybe the knot is not yet untied) CoreUnfolding { uf_tmpl = unf_template , uf_is_work_free = is_wf , uf_guidance = guidance, uf_expandable = is_exp } | active_unfolding -> tryUnfolding dflags id lone_variable arg_infos cont_info unf_template is_wf is_exp guidance | otherwise -> traceInline dflags id "Inactive unfolding:" (ppr id) Nothing NoUnfolding -> Nothing BootUnfolding -> Nothing OtherCon {} -> Nothing DFunUnfolding {} -> Nothing -- Never unfold a DFun -- | Report the inlining of an identifier's RHS to the user, if requested. traceInline :: DynFlags -> Id -> String -> SDoc -> a -> a traceInline dflags inline_id str doc result -- We take care to ensure that doc is used in only one branch, ensuring that -- the simplifier can push its allocation into the branch. See Note [INLINE -- conditional tracing utilities]. | enable = traceAction dflags str doc result | otherwise = result where enable | dopt Opt_D_dump_inlinings dflags && dopt Opt_D_verbose_core2core dflags = True | Just prefix <- inlineCheck dflags = prefix `isPrefixOf` occNameString (getOccName inline_id) | otherwise = False {-# INLINE traceInline #-} -- see Note [INLINE conditional tracing utilities] tryUnfolding :: DynFlags -> Id -> Bool -> [ArgSummary] -> CallCtxt -> CoreExpr -> Bool -> Bool -> UnfoldingGuidance -> Maybe CoreExpr tryUnfolding dflags id lone_variable arg_infos cont_info unf_template is_wf is_exp guidance = case guidance of UnfNever -> traceInline dflags id str (text "UnfNever") Nothing UnfWhen { ug_arity = uf_arity, ug_unsat_ok = unsat_ok, ug_boring_ok = boring_ok } | enough_args && (boring_ok || some_benefit || ufVeryAggressive dflags) -- See Note [INLINE for small functions (3)] -> traceInline dflags id str (mk_doc some_benefit empty True) (Just unf_template) | otherwise -> traceInline dflags id str (mk_doc some_benefit empty False) Nothing where some_benefit = calc_some_benefit uf_arity enough_args = (n_val_args >= uf_arity) || (unsat_ok && n_val_args > 0) UnfIfGoodArgs { ug_args = arg_discounts, ug_res = res_discount, ug_size = size } | ufVeryAggressive dflags -> traceInline dflags id str (mk_doc some_benefit extra_doc True) (Just unf_template) | is_wf && some_benefit && small_enough -> traceInline dflags id str (mk_doc some_benefit extra_doc True) (Just unf_template) | otherwise -> traceInline dflags id str (mk_doc some_benefit extra_doc False) Nothing where some_benefit = calc_some_benefit (length arg_discounts) extra_doc = text "discounted size =" <+> int discounted_size discounted_size = size - discount small_enough = discounted_size <= ufUseThreshold dflags discount = computeDiscount arg_discounts res_discount arg_infos cont_info where mk_doc some_benefit extra_doc yes_or_no = vcat [ text "arg infos" <+> ppr arg_infos , text "interesting continuation" <+> ppr cont_info , text "some_benefit" <+> ppr some_benefit , text "is exp:" <+> ppr is_exp , text "is work-free:" <+> ppr is_wf , text "guidance" <+> ppr guidance , extra_doc , text "ANSWER =" <+> if yes_or_no then text "YES" else text "NO"] str = "Considering inlining: " ++ showSDocDump dflags (ppr id) n_val_args = length arg_infos -- some_benefit is used when the RHS is small enough -- and the call has enough (or too many) value -- arguments (ie n_val_args >= arity). But there must -- be *something* interesting about some argument, or the -- result context, to make it worth inlining calc_some_benefit :: Arity -> Bool -- The Arity is the number of args -- expected by the unfolding calc_some_benefit uf_arity | not saturated = interesting_args -- Under-saturated -- Note [Unsaturated applications] | otherwise = interesting_args -- Saturated or over-saturated || interesting_call where saturated = n_val_args >= uf_arity over_saturated = n_val_args > uf_arity interesting_args = any nonTriv arg_infos -- NB: (any nonTriv arg_infos) looks at the -- over-saturated args too which is "wrong"; -- but if over-saturated we inline anyway. interesting_call | over_saturated = True | otherwise = case cont_info of CaseCtxt -> not (lone_variable && is_exp) -- Note [Lone variables] ValAppCtxt -> True -- Note [Cast then apply] RuleArgCtxt -> uf_arity > 0 -- See Note [Unfold info lazy contexts] DiscArgCtxt -> uf_arity > 0 -- Note [Inlining in ArgCtxt] RhsCtxt -> uf_arity > 0 -- _other -> False -- See Note [Nested functions] {- Note [Unfold into lazy contexts], Note [RHS of lets] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When the call is the argument of a function with a RULE, or the RHS of a let, we are a little bit keener to inline. For example f y = (y,y,y) g y = let x = f y in ...(case x of (a,b,c) -> ...) ... We'd inline 'f' if the call was in a case context, and it kind-of-is, only we can't see it. Also x = f v could be expensive whereas x = case v of (a,b) -> a is patently cheap and may allow more eta expansion. So we treat the RHS of a let as not-totally-boring. Note [Unsaturated applications] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ When a call is not saturated, we *still* inline if one of the arguments has interesting structure. That's sometimes very important. A good example is the Ord instance for Bool in Base: Rec { $fOrdBool =GHC.Classes.D:Ord @ Bool ... $cmin_ajX $cmin_ajX [Occ=LoopBreaker] :: Bool -> Bool -> Bool $cmin_ajX = GHC.Classes.$dmmin @ Bool $fOrdBool } But the defn of GHC.Classes.$dmmin is: $dmmin :: forall a. GHC.Classes.Ord a => a -> a -> a {- Arity: 3, HasNoCafRefs, Strictness: SLL, Unfolding: (\ @ a $dOrd :: GHC.Classes.Ord a x :: a y :: a -> case @ a GHC.Classes.<= @ a $dOrd x y of wild { GHC.Types.False -> y GHC.Types.True -> x }) -} We *really* want to inline $dmmin, even though it has arity 3, in order to unravel the recursion. Note [Things to watch] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ * { y = I# 3; x = y `cast` co; ...case (x `cast` co) of ... } Assume x is exported, so not inlined unconditionally. Then we want x to inline unconditionally; no reason for it not to, and doing so avoids an indirection. * { x = I# 3; ....f x.... } Make sure that x does not inline unconditionally! Lest we get extra allocation. Note [Inlining an InlineRule] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An InlineRules is used for (a) programmer INLINE pragmas (b) inlinings from worker/wrapper For (a) the RHS may be large, and our contract is that we *only* inline when the function is applied to all the arguments on the LHS of the source-code defn. (The uf_arity in the rule.) However for worker/wrapper it may be worth inlining even if the arity is not satisfied (as we do in the CoreUnfolding case) so we don't require saturation. Note [Nested functions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ At one time we treated a call of a non-top-level function as "interesting" (regardless of how boring the context) in the hope that inlining it would eliminate the binding, and its allocation. Specifically, in the default case of interesting_call we had _other -> not is_top && uf_arity > 0 But actually postInlineUnconditionally does some of this and overall it makes virtually no difference to nofib. So I simplified away this special case Note [Cast then apply] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider myIndex = __inline_me ( (/\a. <blah>) |> co ) co :: (forall a. a -> a) ~ (forall a. T a) ... /\a.\x. case ((myIndex a) |> sym co) x of { ... } ... We need to inline myIndex to unravel this; but the actual call (myIndex a) has no value arguments. The ValAppCtxt gives it enough incentive to inline. Note [Inlining in ArgCtxt] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The condition (arity > 0) here is very important, because otherwise we end up inlining top-level stuff into useless places; eg x = I# 3# f = \y. g x This can make a very big difference: it adds 16% to nofib 'integer' allocs, and 20% to 'power'. At one stage I replaced this condition by 'True' (leading to the above slow-down). The motivation was test eyeball/inline1.hs; but that seems to work ok now. NOTE: arguably, we should inline in ArgCtxt only if the result of the call is at least CONLIKE. At least for the cases where we use ArgCtxt for the RHS of a 'let', we only profit from the inlining if we get a CONLIKE thing (modulo lets). Note [Lone variables] See also Note [Interaction of exprIsWorkFree and lone variables] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ which appears below The "lone-variable" case is important. I spent ages messing about with unsatisfactory variants, but this is nice. The idea is that if a variable appears all alone as an arg of lazy fn, or rhs BoringCtxt as scrutinee of a case CaseCtxt as arg of a fn ArgCtxt AND it is bound to a cheap expression then we should not inline it (unless there is some other reason, e.g. it is the sole occurrence). That is what is happening at the use of 'lone_variable' in 'interesting_call'. Why? At least in the case-scrutinee situation, turning let x = (a,b) in case x of y -> ... into let x = (a,b) in case (a,b) of y -> ... and thence to let x = (a,b) in let y = (a,b) in ... is bad if the binding for x will remain. Another example: I discovered that strings were getting inlined straight back into applications of 'error' because the latter is strict. s = "foo" f = \x -> ...(error s)... Fundamentally such contexts should not encourage inlining because, provided the RHS is "expandable" (see Note [exprIsExpandable] in GHC.Core.Utils) the context can ``see'' the unfolding of the variable (e.g. case or a RULE) so there's no gain. However, watch out: * Consider this: foo = _inline_ (\n. [n]) bar = _inline_ (foo 20) baz = \n. case bar of { (m:_) -> m + n } Here we really want to inline 'bar' so that we can inline 'foo' and the whole thing unravels as it should obviously do. This is important: in the NDP project, 'bar' generates a closure data structure rather than a list. So the non-inlining of lone_variables should only apply if the unfolding is regarded as cheap; because that is when exprIsConApp_maybe looks through the unfolding. Hence the "&& is_wf" in the InlineRule branch. * Even a type application or coercion isn't a lone variable. Consider case $fMonadST @ RealWorld of { :DMonad a b c -> c } We had better inline that sucker! The case won't see through it. For now, I'm treating treating a variable applied to types in a *lazy* context "lone". The motivating example was f = /\a. \x. BIG g = /\a. \y. h (f a) There's no advantage in inlining f here, and perhaps a significant disadvantage. Hence some_val_args in the Stop case Note [Interaction of exprIsWorkFree and lone variables] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The lone-variable test says "don't inline if a case expression scrutinises a lone variable whose unfolding is cheap". It's very important that, under these circumstances, exprIsConApp_maybe can spot a constructor application. So, for example, we don't consider let x = e in (x,x) to be cheap, and that's good because exprIsConApp_maybe doesn't think that expression is a constructor application. In the 'not (lone_variable && is_wf)' test, I used to test is_value rather than is_wf, which was utterly wrong, because the above expression responds True to exprIsHNF, which is what sets is_value. This kind of thing can occur if you have {-# INLINE foo #-} foo = let x = e in (x,x) which Roman did. -} computeDiscount :: [Int] -> Int -> [ArgSummary] -> CallCtxt -> Int computeDiscount arg_discounts res_discount arg_infos cont_info = 10 -- Discount of 10 because the result replaces the call -- so we count 10 for the function itself + 10 * length actual_arg_discounts -- Discount of 10 for each arg supplied, -- because the result replaces the call + total_arg_discount + res_discount' where actual_arg_discounts = zipWith mk_arg_discount arg_discounts arg_infos total_arg_discount = sum actual_arg_discounts mk_arg_discount _ TrivArg = 0 mk_arg_discount _ NonTrivArg = 10 mk_arg_discount discount ValueArg = discount res_discount' | LT <- arg_discounts `compareLength` arg_infos = res_discount -- Over-saturated | otherwise = case cont_info of BoringCtxt -> 0 CaseCtxt -> res_discount -- Presumably a constructor ValAppCtxt -> res_discount -- Presumably a function _ -> 40 `min` res_discount -- ToDo: this 40 `min` res_discount doesn't seem right -- for DiscArgCtxt it shouldn't matter because the function will -- get the arg discount for any non-triv arg -- for RuleArgCtxt we do want to be keener to inline; but not only -- constructor results -- for RhsCtxt I suppose that exposing a data con is good in general -- And 40 seems very arbitrary -- -- res_discount can be very large when a function returns -- constructors; but we only want to invoke that large discount -- when there's a case continuation. -- Otherwise we, rather arbitrarily, threshold it. Yuk. -- But we want to avoid inlining large functions that return -- constructors into contexts that are simply "interesting"