{-# LANGUAGE Unsafe #-} {-# LANGUAGE NoImplicitPrelude , BangPatterns , RankNTypes , MagicHash , UnboxedTuples #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -funbox-strict-fields #-} {-# OPTIONS_HADDOCK hide #-} ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | -- Module : GHC.IO -- Copyright : (c) The University of Glasgow 1994-2002 -- License : see libraries/base/LICENSE -- -- Maintainer : cvs-ghc@haskell.org -- Stability : internal -- Portability : non-portable (GHC Extensions) -- -- Definitions for the 'IO' monad and its friends. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- module GHC.IO ( IO(..), unIO, failIO, liftIO, unsafePerformIO, unsafeInterleaveIO, unsafeDupablePerformIO, unsafeDupableInterleaveIO, noDuplicate, -- To and from from ST stToIO, ioToST, unsafeIOToST, unsafeSTToIO, FilePath, catchException, catchAny, throwIO, mask, mask_, uninterruptibleMask, uninterruptibleMask_, MaskingState(..), getMaskingState, unsafeUnmask, onException, bracket, finally, evaluate ) where import GHC.Base import GHC.ST import GHC.Exception import GHC.Show import {-# SOURCE #-} GHC.IO.Exception ( userError ) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- The IO Monad {- The IO Monad is just an instance of the ST monad, where the state is the real world. We use the exception mechanism (in GHC.Exception) to implement IO exceptions. NOTE: The IO representation is deeply wired in to various parts of the system. The following list may or may not be exhaustive: Compiler - types of various primitives in PrimOp.lhs RTS - forceIO (StgMiscClosures.hc) - catchzh_fast, (un)?blockAsyncExceptionszh_fast, raisezh_fast (Exceptions.hc) - raiseAsync (Schedule.c) Prelude - GHC.IO.lhs, and several other places including GHC.Exception.lhs. Libraries - parts of hslibs/lang. --SDM -} liftIO :: IO a -> State# RealWorld -> STret RealWorld a liftIO (IO m) = \s -> case m s of (# s', r #) -> STret s' r failIO :: String -> IO a failIO s = IO (raiseIO# (toException (userError s))) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Coercions between IO and ST -- | A monad transformer embedding strict state transformers in the 'IO' -- monad. The 'RealWorld' parameter indicates that the internal state -- used by the 'ST' computation is a special one supplied by the 'IO' -- monad, and thus distinct from those used by invocations of 'runST'. stToIO :: ST RealWorld a -> IO a stToIO (ST m) = IO m ioToST :: IO a -> ST RealWorld a ioToST (IO m) = (ST m) -- This relies on IO and ST having the same representation modulo the -- constraint on the type of the state -- unsafeIOToST :: IO a -> ST s a unsafeIOToST (IO io) = ST $ \ s -> (unsafeCoerce# io) s unsafeSTToIO :: ST s a -> IO a unsafeSTToIO (ST m) = IO (unsafeCoerce# m) -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Unsafe IO operations {-| This is the \"back door\" into the 'IO' monad, allowing 'IO' computation to be performed at any time. For this to be safe, the 'IO' computation should be free of side effects and independent of its environment. If the I\/O computation wrapped in 'unsafePerformIO' performs side effects, then the relative order in which those side effects take place (relative to the main I\/O trunk, or other calls to 'unsafePerformIO') is indeterminate. Furthermore, when using 'unsafePerformIO' to cause side-effects, you should take the following precautions to ensure the side effects are performed as many times as you expect them to be. Note that these precautions are necessary for GHC, but may not be sufficient, and other compilers may require different precautions: * Use @{\-\# NOINLINE foo \#-\}@ as a pragma on any function @foo@ that calls 'unsafePerformIO'. If the call is inlined, the I\/O may be performed more than once. * Use the compiler flag @-fno-cse@ to prevent common sub-expression elimination being performed on the module, which might combine two side effects that were meant to be separate. A good example is using multiple global variables (like @test@ in the example below). * Make sure that the either you switch off let-floating (@-fno-full-laziness@), or that the call to 'unsafePerformIO' cannot float outside a lambda. For example, if you say: @ f x = unsafePerformIO (newIORef []) @ you may get only one reference cell shared between all calls to @f@. Better would be @ f x = unsafePerformIO (newIORef [x]) @ because now it can't float outside the lambda. It is less well known that 'unsafePerformIO' is not type safe. For example: > test :: IORef [a] > test = unsafePerformIO $ newIORef [] > > main = do > writeIORef test [42] > bang <- readIORef test > print (bang :: [Char]) This program will core dump. This problem with polymorphic references is well known in the ML community, and does not arise with normal monadic use of references. There is no easy way to make it impossible once you use 'unsafePerformIO'. Indeed, it is possible to write @coerce :: a -> b@ with the help of 'unsafePerformIO'. So be careful! -} unsafePerformIO :: IO a -> a unsafePerformIO m = unsafeDupablePerformIO (noDuplicate >> m) {-| This version of 'unsafePerformIO' is more efficient because it omits the check that the IO is only being performed by a single thread. Hence, when you use 'unsafeDupablePerformIO', there is a possibility that the IO action may be performed multiple times (on a multiprocessor), and you should therefore ensure that it gives the same results each time. It may even happen that one of the duplicated IO actions is only run partially, and then interrupted in the middle without an exception being raised. Therefore, functions like 'bracket' cannot be used safely within 'unsafeDupablePerformIO'. @since 4.4.0.0 -} {-# NOINLINE unsafeDupablePerformIO #-} -- See Note [unsafeDupablePerformIO is NOINLINE] unsafeDupablePerformIO :: IO a -> a unsafeDupablePerformIO (IO m) = lazy (case m realWorld# of (# _, r #) -> r) -- See Note [unsafeDupablePerformIO has a lazy RHS] -- Note [unsafeDupablePerformIO is NOINLINE] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Why do we NOINLINE unsafeDupablePerformIO? See the comment with -- GHC.ST.runST. Essentially the issue is that the IO computation -- inside unsafePerformIO must be atomic: it must either all run, or -- not at all. If we let the compiler see the application of the IO -- to realWorld#, it might float out part of the IO. -- Note [unsafeDupablePerformIO has a lazy RHS] -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -- Why is there a call to 'lazy' in unsafeDupablePerformIO? -- If we don't have it, the demand analyser discovers the following strictness -- for unsafeDupablePerformIO: C(U(AV)) -- But then consider -- unsafeDupablePerformIO (\s -> let r = f x in -- case writeIORef v r s of (# s1, _ #) -> -- (# s1, r #) ) -- The strictness analyser will find that the binding for r is strict, -- (because of uPIO's strictness sig), and so it'll evaluate it before -- doing the writeIORef. This actually makes libraries/base/tests/memo002 -- get a deadlock, where we specifically wanted to write a lazy thunk -- into the ref cell. -- -- Solution: don't expose the strictness of unsafeDupablePerformIO, -- by hiding it with 'lazy' -- But see discussion in Trac #9390 (comment:33) {-| 'unsafeInterleaveIO' allows 'IO' computation to be deferred lazily. When passed a value of type @IO a@, the 'IO' will only be performed when the value of the @a@ is demanded. This is used to implement lazy file reading, see 'System.IO.hGetContents'. -} {-# INLINE unsafeInterleaveIO #-} unsafeInterleaveIO :: IO a -> IO a unsafeInterleaveIO m = unsafeDupableInterleaveIO (noDuplicate >> m) -- We used to believe that INLINE on unsafeInterleaveIO was safe, -- because the state from this IO thread is passed explicitly to the -- interleaved IO, so it cannot be floated out and shared. -- -- HOWEVER, if the compiler figures out that r is used strictly here, -- then it will eliminate the thunk and the side effects in m will no -- longer be shared in the way the programmer was probably expecting, -- but can be performed many times. In #5943, this broke our -- definition of fixIO, which contains -- -- ans <- unsafeInterleaveIO (takeMVar m) -- -- after inlining, we lose the sharing of the takeMVar, so the second -- time 'ans' was demanded we got a deadlock. We could fix this with -- a readMVar, but it seems wrong for unsafeInterleaveIO to sometimes -- share and sometimes not (plus it probably breaks the noDuplicate). -- So now, we do not inline unsafeDupableInterleaveIO. {-# NOINLINE unsafeDupableInterleaveIO #-} unsafeDupableInterleaveIO :: IO a -> IO a unsafeDupableInterleaveIO (IO m) = IO ( \ s -> let r = case m s of (# _, res #) -> res in (# s, r #)) {-| Ensures that the suspensions under evaluation by the current thread are unique; that is, the current thread is not evaluating anything that is also under evaluation by another thread that has also executed 'noDuplicate'. This operation is used in the definition of 'unsafePerformIO' to prevent the IO action from being executed multiple times, which is usually undesirable. -} noDuplicate :: IO () noDuplicate = IO $ \s -> case noDuplicate# s of s' -> (# s', () #) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- | File and directory names are values of type 'String', whose precise -- meaning is operating system dependent. Files can be opened, yielding a -- handle which can then be used to operate on the contents of that file. type FilePath = String -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Primitive catch and throwIO {- catchException used to handle the passing around of the state to the action and the handler. This turned out to be a bad idea - it meant that we had to wrap both arguments in thunks so they could be entered as normal (remember IO returns an unboxed pair...). Now catch# has type catch# :: IO a -> (b -> IO a) -> IO a (well almost; the compiler doesn't know about the IO newtype so we have to work around that in the definition of catchException below). -} catchException :: Exception e => IO a -> (e -> IO a) -> IO a catchException (IO io) handler = IO $ catch# io handler' where handler' e = case fromException e of Just e' -> unIO (handler e') Nothing -> raiseIO# e catchAny :: IO a -> (forall e . Exception e => e -> IO a) -> IO a catchAny (IO io) handler = IO $ catch# io handler' where handler' (SomeException e) = unIO (handler e) -- | A variant of 'throw' that can only be used within the 'IO' monad. -- -- Although 'throwIO' has a type that is an instance of the type of 'throw', the -- two functions are subtly different: -- -- > throw e `seq` x ===> throw e -- > throwIO e `seq` x ===> x -- -- The first example will cause the exception @e@ to be raised, -- whereas the second one won\'t. In fact, 'throwIO' will only cause -- an exception to be raised when it is used within the 'IO' monad. -- The 'throwIO' variant should be used in preference to 'throw' to -- raise an exception within the 'IO' monad because it guarantees -- ordering with respect to other 'IO' operations, whereas 'throw' -- does not. throwIO :: Exception e => e -> IO a throwIO e = IO (raiseIO# (toException e)) -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Controlling asynchronous exception delivery -- Applying 'block' to a computation will -- execute that computation with asynchronous exceptions -- /blocked/. That is, any thread which -- attempts to raise an exception in the current thread with 'Control.Exception.throwTo' will be -- blocked until asynchronous exceptions are unblocked again. There\'s -- no need to worry about re-enabling asynchronous exceptions; that is -- done automatically on exiting the scope of -- 'block'. -- -- Threads created by 'Control.Concurrent.forkIO' inherit the blocked -- state from the parent; that is, to start a thread in blocked mode, -- use @block $ forkIO ...@. This is particularly useful if you need to -- establish an exception handler in the forked thread before any -- asynchronous exceptions are received. block :: IO a -> IO a block (IO io) = IO $ maskAsyncExceptions# io -- To re-enable asynchronous exceptions inside the scope of -- 'block', 'unblock' can be -- used. It scopes in exactly the same way, so on exit from -- 'unblock' asynchronous exception delivery will -- be disabled again. unblock :: IO a -> IO a unblock = unsafeUnmask unsafeUnmask :: IO a -> IO a unsafeUnmask (IO io) = IO $ unmaskAsyncExceptions# io blockUninterruptible :: IO a -> IO a blockUninterruptible (IO io) = IO $ maskUninterruptible# io -- | Describes the behaviour of a thread when an asynchronous -- exception is received. data MaskingState = Unmasked -- ^ asynchronous exceptions are unmasked (the normal state) | MaskedInterruptible -- ^ the state during 'mask': asynchronous exceptions are masked, but blocking operations may still be interrupted | MaskedUninterruptible -- ^ the state during 'uninterruptibleMask': asynchronous exceptions are masked, and blocking operations may not be interrupted deriving (Eq,Show) -- | Returns the 'MaskingState' for the current thread. getMaskingState :: IO MaskingState getMaskingState = IO $ \s -> case getMaskingState# s of (# s', i #) -> (# s', case i of 0# -> Unmasked 1# -> MaskedUninterruptible _ -> MaskedInterruptible #) onException :: IO a -> IO b -> IO a onException io what = io `catchException` \e -> do _ <- what throwIO (e :: SomeException) -- | Executes an IO computation with asynchronous -- exceptions /masked/. That is, any thread which attempts to raise -- an exception in the current thread with 'Control.Exception.throwTo' -- will be blocked until asynchronous exceptions are unmasked again. -- -- The argument passed to 'mask' is a function that takes as its -- argument another function, which can be used to restore the -- prevailing masking state within the context of the masked -- computation. For example, a common way to use 'mask' is to protect -- the acquisition of a resource: -- -- > mask $ \restore -> do -- > x <- acquire -- > restore (do_something_with x) `onException` release -- > release -- -- This code guarantees that @acquire@ is paired with @release@, by masking -- asynchronous exceptions for the critical parts. (Rather than write -- this code yourself, it would be better to use -- 'Control.Exception.bracket' which abstracts the general pattern). -- -- Note that the @restore@ action passed to the argument to 'mask' -- does not necessarily unmask asynchronous exceptions, it just -- restores the masking state to that of the enclosing context. Thus -- if asynchronous exceptions are already masked, 'mask' cannot be used -- to unmask exceptions again. This is so that if you call a library function -- with exceptions masked, you can be sure that the library call will not be -- able to unmask exceptions again. If you are writing library code and need -- to use asynchronous exceptions, the only way is to create a new thread; -- see 'Control.Concurrent.forkIOWithUnmask'. -- -- Asynchronous exceptions may still be received while in the masked -- state if the masked thread /blocks/ in certain ways; see -- "Control.Exception#interruptible". -- -- Threads created by 'Control.Concurrent.forkIO' inherit the -- 'MaskingState' from the parent; that is, to start a thread in the -- 'MaskedInterruptible' state, -- use @mask_ $ forkIO ...@. This is particularly useful if you need -- to establish an exception handler in the forked thread before any -- asynchronous exceptions are received. To create a a new thread in -- an unmasked state use 'Control.Concurrent.forkIOUnmasked'. -- mask :: ((forall a. IO a -> IO a) -> IO b) -> IO b -- | Like 'mask', but does not pass a @restore@ action to the argument. mask_ :: IO a -> IO a -- | Like 'mask', but the masked computation is not interruptible (see -- "Control.Exception#interruptible"). THIS SHOULD BE USED WITH -- GREAT CARE, because if a thread executing in 'uninterruptibleMask' -- blocks for any reason, then the thread (and possibly the program, -- if this is the main thread) will be unresponsive and unkillable. -- This function should only be necessary if you need to mask -- exceptions around an interruptible operation, and you can guarantee -- that the interruptible operation will only block for a short period -- of time. -- uninterruptibleMask :: ((forall a. IO a -> IO a) -> IO b) -> IO b -- | Like 'uninterruptibleMask', but does not pass a @restore@ action -- to the argument. uninterruptibleMask_ :: IO a -> IO a mask_ io = mask $ \_ -> io mask io = do b <- getMaskingState case b of Unmasked -> block $ io unblock MaskedInterruptible -> io block MaskedUninterruptible -> io blockUninterruptible uninterruptibleMask_ io = uninterruptibleMask $ \_ -> io uninterruptibleMask io = do b <- getMaskingState case b of Unmasked -> blockUninterruptible $ io unblock MaskedInterruptible -> blockUninterruptible $ io block MaskedUninterruptible -> io blockUninterruptible bracket :: IO a -- ^ computation to run first (\"acquire resource\") -> (a -> IO b) -- ^ computation to run last (\"release resource\") -> (a -> IO c) -- ^ computation to run in-between -> IO c -- returns the value from the in-between computation bracket before after thing = mask $ \restore -> do a <- before r <- restore (thing a) `onException` after a _ <- after a return r finally :: IO a -- ^ computation to run first -> IO b -- ^ computation to run afterward (even if an exception -- was raised) -> IO a -- returns the value from the first computation a `finally` sequel = mask $ \restore -> do r <- restore a `onException` sequel _ <- sequel return r -- | Forces its argument to be evaluated to weak head normal form when -- the resultant 'IO' action is executed. It can be used to order -- evaluation with respect to other 'IO' operations; its semantics are -- given by -- -- > evaluate x `seq` y ==> y -- > evaluate x `catch` f ==> (return $! x) `catch` f -- > evaluate x >>= f ==> (return $! x) >>= f -- -- /Note:/ the first equation implies that @(evaluate x)@ is /not/ the -- same as @(return $! x)@. A correct definition is -- -- > evaluate x = (return $! x) >>= return -- evaluate :: a -> IO a evaluate a = IO $ \s -> seq# a s -- NB. see #2273, #5129