module CmmType ( CmmType -- Abstract , b8, b16, b32, b64, f32, f64, bWord, bHalfWord, gcWord , cInt, cLong , cmmBits, cmmFloat , typeWidth, cmmEqType, cmmEqType_ignoring_ptrhood , isFloatType, isGcPtrType, isWord32, isWord64, isFloat64, isFloat32 , Width(..) , widthInBits, widthInBytes, widthInLog, widthFromBytes , wordWidth, halfWordWidth, cIntWidth, cLongWidth , halfWordMask , narrowU, narrowS ) where #include "HsVersions.h" import Constants import FastString import Outputable import Data.Word import Data.Int ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- CmmType ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- NOTE: CmmType is an abstract type, not exported from this -- module so you can easily change its representation -- -- However Width is exported in a concrete way, -- and is used extensively in pattern-matching data CmmType -- The important one! = CmmType CmmCat Width data CmmCat -- "Category" (not exported) = GcPtrCat -- GC pointer | BitsCat -- Non-pointer | FloatCat -- Float deriving( Eq ) -- See Note [Signed vs unsigned] at the end instance Outputable CmmType where ppr (CmmType cat wid) = ppr cat <> ppr (widthInBits wid) instance Outputable CmmCat where ppr FloatCat = ptext $ sLit("F") ppr _ = ptext $ sLit("I") -- Why is CmmType stratified? For native code generation, -- most of the time you just want to know what sort of register -- to put the thing in, and for this you need to know how -- many bits thing has and whether it goes in a floating-point -- register. By contrast, the distinction between GcPtr and -- GcNonPtr is of interest to only a few parts of the code generator. -------- Equality on CmmType -------------- -- CmmType is *not* an instance of Eq; sometimes we care about the -- Gc/NonGc distinction, and sometimes we don't -- So we use an explicit function to force you to think about it cmmEqType :: CmmType -> CmmType -> Bool -- Exact equality cmmEqType (CmmType c1 w1) (CmmType c2 w2) = c1==c2 && w1==w2 cmmEqType_ignoring_ptrhood :: CmmType -> CmmType -> Bool -- This equality is temporary; used in CmmLint -- but the RTS files are not yet well-typed wrt pointers cmmEqType_ignoring_ptrhood (CmmType c1 w1) (CmmType c2 w2) = c1 `weak_eq` c2 && w1==w2 where FloatCat `weak_eq` FloatCat = True FloatCat `weak_eq` _other = False _other `weak_eq` FloatCat = False _word1 `weak_eq` _word2 = True -- Ignores GcPtr --- Simple operations on CmmType ----- typeWidth :: CmmType -> Width typeWidth (CmmType _ w) = w cmmBits, cmmFloat :: Width -> CmmType cmmBits = CmmType BitsCat cmmFloat = CmmType FloatCat -------- Common CmmTypes ------------ -- Floats and words of specific widths b8, b16, b32, b64, f32, f64 :: CmmType b8 = cmmBits W8 b16 = cmmBits W16 b32 = cmmBits W32 b64 = cmmBits W64 f32 = cmmFloat W32 f64 = cmmFloat W64 -- CmmTypes of native word widths bWord, bHalfWord, gcWord :: CmmType bWord = cmmBits wordWidth bHalfWord = cmmBits halfWordWidth gcWord = CmmType GcPtrCat wordWidth cInt, cLong :: CmmType cInt = cmmBits cIntWidth cLong = cmmBits cLongWidth ------------ Predicates ---------------- isFloatType, isGcPtrType :: CmmType -> Bool isFloatType (CmmType FloatCat _) = True isFloatType _other = False isGcPtrType (CmmType GcPtrCat _) = True isGcPtrType _other = False isWord32, isWord64, isFloat32, isFloat64 :: CmmType -> Bool -- isWord64 is true of 64-bit non-floats (both gc-ptrs and otherwise) -- isFloat32 and 64 are obvious isWord64 (CmmType BitsCat W64) = True isWord64 (CmmType GcPtrCat W64) = True isWord64 _other = False isWord32 (CmmType BitsCat W32) = True isWord32 (CmmType GcPtrCat W32) = True isWord32 _other = False isFloat32 (CmmType FloatCat W32) = True isFloat32 _other = False isFloat64 (CmmType FloatCat W64) = True isFloat64 _other = False ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -- Width ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- data Width = W8 | W16 | W32 | W64 | W80 -- Extended double-precision float, -- used in x86 native codegen only. -- (we use Ord, so it'd better be in this order) | W128 deriving (Eq, Ord, Show) instance Outputable Width where ppr rep = ptext (mrStr rep) mrStr :: Width -> LitString mrStr W8 = sLit("W8") mrStr W16 = sLit("W16") mrStr W32 = sLit("W32") mrStr W64 = sLit("W64") mrStr W128 = sLit("W128") mrStr W80 = sLit("W80") -------- Common Widths ------------ wordWidth, halfWordWidth :: Width wordWidth | wORD_SIZE == 4 = W32 | wORD_SIZE == 8 = W64 | otherwise = panic "MachOp.wordRep: Unknown word size" halfWordWidth | wORD_SIZE == 4 = W16 | wORD_SIZE == 8 = W32 | otherwise = panic "MachOp.halfWordRep: Unknown word size" halfWordMask :: Integer halfWordMask | wORD_SIZE == 4 = 0xFFFF | wORD_SIZE == 8 = 0xFFFFFFFF | otherwise = panic "MachOp.halfWordMask: Unknown word size" -- cIntRep is the Width for a C-language 'int' cIntWidth, cLongWidth :: Width #if SIZEOF_INT == 4 cIntWidth = W32 #elif SIZEOF_INT == 8 cIntWidth = W64 #endif #if SIZEOF_LONG == 4 cLongWidth = W32 #elif SIZEOF_LONG == 8 cLongWidth = W64 #endif widthInBits :: Width -> Int widthInBits W8 = 8 widthInBits W16 = 16 widthInBits W32 = 32 widthInBits W64 = 64 widthInBits W128 = 128 widthInBits W80 = 80 widthInBytes :: Width -> Int widthInBytes W8 = 1 widthInBytes W16 = 2 widthInBytes W32 = 4 widthInBytes W64 = 8 widthInBytes W128 = 16 widthInBytes W80 = 10 widthFromBytes :: Int -> Width widthFromBytes 1 = W8 widthFromBytes 2 = W16 widthFromBytes 4 = W32 widthFromBytes 8 = W64 widthFromBytes 16 = W128 widthFromBytes 10 = W80 widthFromBytes n = pprPanic "no width for given number of bytes" (ppr n) -- log_2 of the width in bytes, useful for generating shifts. widthInLog :: Width -> Int widthInLog W8 = 0 widthInLog W16 = 1 widthInLog W32 = 2 widthInLog W64 = 3 widthInLog W128 = 4 widthInLog W80 = panic "widthInLog: F80" -- widening / narrowing narrowU :: Width -> Integer -> Integer narrowU W8 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Word8) narrowU W16 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Word16) narrowU W32 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Word32) narrowU W64 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Word64) narrowU _ _ = panic "narrowTo" narrowS :: Width -> Integer -> Integer narrowS W8 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Int8) narrowS W16 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Int16) narrowS W32 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Int32) narrowS W64 x = fromIntegral (fromIntegral x :: Int64) narrowS _ _ = panic "narrowTo" ------------------------------------------------------------------------- {- Note [Signed vs unsigned] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Should a CmmType include a signed vs. unsigned distinction? This is very much like a "hint" in C-- terminology: it isn't necessary in order to generate correct code, but it might be useful in that the compiler can generate better code if it has access to higher-level hints about data. This is important at call boundaries, because the definition of a function is not visible at all of its call sites, so the compiler cannot infer the hints. Here in Cmm, we're taking a slightly different approach. We include the int vs. float hint in the CmmType, because (a) the majority of platforms have a strong distinction between float and int registers, and (b) we don't want to do any heavyweight hint-inference in the native code backend in order to get good code. We're treating the hint more like a type: our Cmm is always completely consistent with respect to hints. All coercions between float and int are explicit. What about the signed vs. unsigned hint? This information might be useful if we want to keep sub-word-sized values in word-size registers, which we must do if we only have word-sized registers. On such a system, there are two straightforward conventions for representing sub-word-sized values: (a) Leave the upper bits undefined. Comparison operations must sign- or zero-extend both operands before comparing them, depending on whether the comparison is signed or unsigned. (b) Always keep the values sign- or zero-extended as appropriate. Arithmetic operations must narrow the result to the appropriate size. A clever compiler might not use either (a) or (b) exclusively, instead it would attempt to minimize the coercions by analysis: the same kind of analysis that propagates hints around. In Cmm we don't want to have to do this, so we plump for having richer types and keeping the type information consistent. If signed/unsigned hints are missing from CmmType, then the only choice we have is (a), because we don't know whether the result of an operation should be sign- or zero-extended. Many architectures have extending load operations, which work well with (b). To make use of them with (a), you need to know whether the value is going to be sign- or zero-extended by an enclosing comparison (for example), which involves knowing above the context. This is doable but more complex. Further complicating the issue is foreign calls: a foreign calling convention can specify that signed 8-bit quantities are passed as sign-extended 32 bit quantities, for example (this is the case on the PowerPC). So we *do* need sign information on foreign call arguments. Pros for adding signed vs. unsigned to CmmType: - It would let us use convention (b) above, and get easier code generation for extending loads. - Less information required on foreign calls. - MachOp type would be simpler Cons: - More complexity - What is the CmmType for a VanillaReg? Currently it is always wordRep, but now we have to decide whether it is signed or unsigned. The same VanillaReg can thus have different CmmType in different parts of the program. - Extra coercions cluttering up expressions. Currently for GHC, the foreign call point is moot, because we do our own promotion of sub-word-sized values to word-sized values. The Int8 type is represnted by an Int# which is kept sign-extended at all times (this is slightly naughty, because we're making assumptions about the C calling convention rather early on in the compiler). However, given this, the cons outweigh the pros. -}