\begin{code}
module TcInteract (
solveInteractGiven,
solveInteract,
) where
#include "HsVersions.h"
import BasicTypes ()
import TcCanonical
import VarSet
import Type
import Unify
import InstEnv( lookupInstEnv, instanceDFunId )
import CoAxiom(sfInteractTop, sfInteractInert)
import Var
import TcType
import PrelNames (knownNatClassName, knownSymbolClassName, ipClassNameKey )
import TysWiredIn ( coercibleClass )
import Id( idType, mkSysLocalM )
import Class
import TyCon
import DataCon
import Name
import RdrName ( GlobalRdrEnv, lookupGRE_Name, mkRdrQual, is_as,
is_decl, Provenance(Imported), gre_prov )
import FunDeps
import FamInstEnv ( FamInstEnvs, instNewTyConTF_maybe )
import TcEvidence
import Outputable
import TcRnTypes
import TcErrors
import TcSMonad
import Bag
import Control.Monad ( foldM )
import Data.Maybe ( catMaybes )
import Data.List( partition )
import VarEnv
import Control.Monad( when, unless, forM )
import Pair (Pair(..))
import Unique( hasKey )
import FastString ( sLit, fsLit )
import DynFlags
import Util
\end{code}
**********************************************************************
* *
* Main Interaction Solver *
* *
**********************************************************************
Note [Basic Simplifier Plan]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
1. Pick an element from the WorkList if there exists one with depth
less than our context-stack depth.
2. Run it down the 'stage' pipeline. Stages are:
- canonicalization
- inert reactions
- spontaneous reactions
- top-level intreactions
Each stage returns a StopOrContinue and may have sideffected
the inerts or worklist.
The threading of the stages is as follows:
- If (Stop) is returned by a stage then we start again from Step 1.
- If (ContinueWith ct) is returned by a stage, we feed 'ct' on to
the next stage in the pipeline.
4. If the element has survived (i.e. ContinueWith x) the last stage
then we add him in the inerts and jump back to Step 1.
If in Step 1 no such element exists, we have exceeded our context-stack
depth and will simply fail.
\begin{code}
solveInteractGiven :: CtLoc -> [TcTyVar] -> [EvVar] -> TcS (Bool, [TcTyVar])
solveInteractGiven loc old_fsks givens
| null givens
= return (True, old_fsks)
| otherwise
= do { implics1 <- solveInteract fsk_bag
; (no_eqs, more_fsks, implics2) <- getGivenInfo (solveInteract given_bag)
; MASSERT( isEmptyBag implics1 && isEmptyBag implics2 )
; return (no_eqs, more_fsks ++ old_fsks) }
where
given_bag = listToBag [ mkNonCanonical $ CtGiven { ctev_evtm = EvId ev_id
, ctev_pred = evVarPred ev_id
, ctev_loc = loc }
| ev_id <- givens ]
fsk_bag = listToBag [ mkNonCanonical $ CtGiven { ctev_evtm = EvCoercion (mkTcNomReflCo tv_ty)
, ctev_pred = pred
, ctev_loc = loc }
| tv <- old_fsks
, let FlatSkol fam_ty = tcTyVarDetails tv
tv_ty = mkTyVarTy tv
pred = mkTcEqPred fam_ty tv_ty
]
solveInteract :: Cts -> TcS (Bag Implication)
solveInteract cts
=
withWorkList cts $
do { dyn_flags <- getDynFlags
; solve_loop (maxSubGoalDepth dyn_flags) }
where
solve_loop max_depth
=
do { sel <- selectNextWorkItem max_depth
; case sel of
NoWorkRemaining
-> return ()
MaxDepthExceeded cnt ct
-> wrapErrTcS $ solverDepthErrorTcS cnt (ctEvidence ct)
NextWorkItem ct
-> do { runSolverPipeline thePipeline ct; solve_loop max_depth } }
type WorkItem = Ct
type SimplifierStage = WorkItem -> TcS StopOrContinue
data SelectWorkItem
= NoWorkRemaining
| MaxDepthExceeded SubGoalCounter Ct
| NextWorkItem Ct
selectNextWorkItem :: SubGoalDepth
-> TcS SelectWorkItem
selectNextWorkItem max_depth
= updWorkListTcS_return pick_next
where
pick_next :: WorkList -> (SelectWorkItem, WorkList)
pick_next wl
= case selectWorkItem wl of
(Nothing,_)
-> (NoWorkRemaining,wl)
(Just ct, new_wl)
| Just cnt <- subGoalDepthExceeded max_depth (ctLocDepth (ctLoc ct))
-> (MaxDepthExceeded cnt ct,new_wl)
(Just ct, new_wl)
-> (NextWorkItem ct, new_wl)
runSolverPipeline :: [(String,SimplifierStage)]
-> WorkItem
-> TcS ()
runSolverPipeline pipeline workItem
= do { initial_is <- getTcSInerts
; traceTcS "Start solver pipeline {" $
vcat [ ptext (sLit "work item = ") <+> ppr workItem
, ptext (sLit "inerts = ") <+> ppr initial_is]
; bumpStepCountTcS
; final_res <- run_pipeline pipeline (ContinueWith workItem)
; final_is <- getTcSInerts
; case final_res of
Stop -> do { traceTcS "End solver pipeline (discharged) }"
(ptext (sLit "inerts = ") <+> ppr final_is)
; return () }
ContinueWith ct -> do { traceFireTcS ct (ptext (sLit "Kept as inert"))
; traceTcS "End solver pipeline (not discharged) }" $
vcat [ ptext (sLit "final_item = ") <+> ppr ct
, pprTvBndrs (varSetElems $ tyVarsOfCt ct)
, ptext (sLit "inerts = ") <+> ppr final_is]
; insertInertItemTcS ct }
}
where run_pipeline :: [(String,SimplifierStage)] -> StopOrContinue -> TcS StopOrContinue
run_pipeline [] res = return res
run_pipeline _ Stop = return Stop
run_pipeline ((stg_name,stg):stgs) (ContinueWith ct)
= do { traceTcS ("runStage " ++ stg_name ++ " {")
(text "workitem = " <+> ppr ct)
; res <- stg ct
; traceTcS ("end stage " ++ stg_name ++ " }") empty
; run_pipeline stgs res
}
\end{code}
Example 1:
Inert: {c ~ d, F a ~ t, b ~ Int, a ~ ty} (all given)
Reagent: a ~ [b] (given)
React with (c~d) ==> IR (ContinueWith (a~[b])) True []
React with (F a ~ t) ==> IR (ContinueWith (a~[b])) False [F [b] ~ t]
React with (b ~ Int) ==> IR (ContinueWith (a~[Int]) True []
Example 2:
Inert: {c ~w d, F a ~g t, b ~w Int, a ~w ty}
Reagent: a ~w [b]
React with (c ~w d) ==> IR (ContinueWith (a~[b])) True []
React with (F a ~g t) ==> IR (ContinueWith (a~[b])) True [] (can't rewrite given with wanted!)
etc.
Example 3:
Inert: {a ~ Int, F Int ~ b} (given)
Reagent: F a ~ b (wanted)
React with (a ~ Int) ==> IR (ContinueWith (F Int ~ b)) True []
React with (F Int ~ b) ==> IR Stop True [] -- after substituting we re-canonicalize and get nothing
\begin{code}
thePipeline :: [(String,SimplifierStage)]
thePipeline = [ ("canonicalization", TcCanonical.canonicalize)
, ("interact with inerts", interactWithInertsStage)
, ("top-level reactions", topReactionsStage) ]
\end{code}
*********************************************************************************
* *
The interact-with-inert Stage
* *
*********************************************************************************
Note [The Solver Invariant]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We always add Givens first. So you might think that the solver has
the invariant
If the work-item is Given,
then the inert item must Given
But this isn't quite true. Suppose we have,
c1: [W] beta ~ [alpha], c2 : [W] blah, c3 :[W] alpha ~ Int
After processing the first two, we get
c1: [G] beta ~ [alpha], c2 : [W] blah
Now, c3 does not interact with the the given c1, so when we spontaneously
solve c3, we must re-react it with the inert set. So we can attempt a
reaction between inert c2 [W] and work-item c3 [G].
It *is* true that [Solver Invariant]
If the work-item is Given,
AND there is a reaction
then the inert item must Given
or, equivalently,
If the work-item is Given,
and the inert item is Wanted/Derived
then there is no reaction
\begin{code}
type StopNowFlag = Bool
interactWithInertsStage :: WorkItem -> TcS StopOrContinue
interactWithInertsStage wi
= do { inerts <- getTcSInerts
; let ics = inert_cans inerts
; (mb_ics', stop) <- case wi of
CTyEqCan {} -> interactTyVarEq ics wi
CFunEqCan {} -> interactFunEq ics wi
CIrredEvCan {} -> interactIrred ics wi
CDictCan {} -> interactDict ics wi
_ -> pprPanic "interactWithInerts" (ppr wi)
; case mb_ics' of
Just ics' -> setTcSInerts (inerts { inert_cans = ics' })
Nothing -> return ()
; case stop of
True -> return Stop
False -> return (ContinueWith wi) }
\end{code}
\begin{code}
data InteractResult = IRKeep | IRReplace | IRDelete
instance Outputable InteractResult where
ppr IRKeep = ptext (sLit "keep")
ppr IRReplace = ptext (sLit "replace")
ppr IRDelete = ptext (sLit "delete")
solveOneFromTheOther :: CtEvidence
-> CtEvidence
-> TcS (InteractResult, StopNowFlag)
solveOneFromTheOther ev_i ev_w
| isDerived ev_w
= return (IRKeep, True)
| isDerived ev_i
= return (IRDelete, False)
| CtWanted { ctev_evar = ev_id } <- ev_w
= do { setEvBind ev_id (ctEvTerm ev_i)
; return (IRKeep, True) }
| CtWanted { ctev_evar = ev_id } <- ev_i
= do { setEvBind ev_id (ctEvTerm ev_w)
; return (IRReplace, True) }
| otherwise
= return (IRReplace, True)
\end{code}
*********************************************************************************
* *
interactIrred
* *
*********************************************************************************
\begin{code}
interactIrred :: InertCans -> Ct -> TcS (Maybe InertCans, StopNowFlag)
interactIrred inerts workItem@(CIrredEvCan { cc_ev = ev_w })
| let pred = ctEvPred ev_w
(matching_irreds, others) = partitionBag (\ct -> ctPred ct `tcEqType` pred)
(inert_irreds inerts)
, (ct_i : rest) <- bagToList matching_irreds
, let ctev_i = ctEvidence ct_i
= ASSERT( null rest )
do { (inert_effect, stop_now) <- solveOneFromTheOther ctev_i ev_w
; let inerts' = case inert_effect of
IRKeep -> Nothing
IRDelete -> Just (inerts { inert_irreds = others })
IRReplace -> Just (inerts { inert_irreds = extendCts others workItem })
; when stop_now $ traceFireTcS workItem $
ptext (sLit "Irred equal") <+> parens (ppr inert_effect)
; return (inerts', stop_now) }
| otherwise
= return (Nothing, False)
interactIrred _ wi = pprPanic "interactIrred" (ppr wi)
\end{code}
*********************************************************************************
* *
interactDict
* *
*********************************************************************************
\begin{code}
interactDict :: InertCans -> Ct -> TcS (Maybe InertCans, StopNowFlag)
interactDict inerts workItem@(CDictCan { cc_ev = ev_w, cc_class = cls, cc_tyargs = tys })
| let dicts = inert_dicts inerts
, Just ct_i <- findDict (inert_dicts inerts) cls tys
, let ctev_i = ctEvidence ct_i
= do { (inert_effect, stop_now) <- solveOneFromTheOther ctev_i ev_w
; let inerts' = case inert_effect of
IRKeep -> Nothing
IRDelete -> Just (inerts { inert_dicts = delDict dicts cls tys })
IRReplace -> Just (inerts { inert_dicts = addDict dicts cls tys workItem })
; when stop_now $ traceFireTcS workItem $
ptext (sLit "Dict equal") <+> parens (ppr inert_effect)
; return (inerts', stop_now) }
| cls `hasKey` ipClassNameKey
, isGiven ev_w
= interactGivenIP inerts workItem
| otherwise
= do { mapBagM_ (addFunDepWork workItem) (findDictsByClass (inert_dicts inerts) cls)
; return (Nothing, False) }
interactDict _ wi = pprPanic "interactDict" (ppr wi)
interactGivenIP :: InertCans -> Ct -> TcS (Maybe InertCans, StopNowFlag)
interactGivenIP inerts workItem@(CDictCan { cc_class = cls, cc_tyargs = tys@(ip_str:_) })
= do { traceFireTcS workItem $ ptext (sLit "Given IP")
; return (Just (inerts { inert_dicts = addDict filtered_dicts cls tys workItem }), True) }
where
dicts = inert_dicts inerts
ip_dicts = findDictsByClass dicts cls
other_ip_dicts = filterBag (not . is_this_ip) ip_dicts
filtered_dicts = addDictsByClass dicts cls other_ip_dicts
is_this_ip (CDictCan { cc_ev = ev, cc_tyargs = ip_str':_ })
= isGiven ev && ip_str `tcEqType` ip_str'
is_this_ip _ = False
interactGivenIP _ wi = pprPanic "interactGivenIP" (ppr wi)
addFunDepWork :: Ct -> Ct -> TcS ()
addFunDepWork work_ct inert_ct
= do { let fd_eqns = improveFromAnother (ctPred inert_ct) (ctPred work_ct)
; fd_work <- rewriteWithFunDeps fd_eqns (ctLoc work_ct)
; traceTcS "addFuNDepWork"
(vcat [ text "inertItem =" <+> ppr inert_ct
, text "workItem =" <+> ppr work_ct
, text "fundeps =" <+> ppr fd_work ])
; case fd_work of
[] -> return ()
_ -> updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListEqs fd_work) }
\end{code}
Note [Shadowing of Implicit Parameters]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider the following example:
f :: (?x :: Char) => Char
f = let ?x = 'a' in ?x
The "let ?x = ..." generates an implication constraint of the form:
?x :: Char => ?x :: Char
Furthermore, the signature for `f` also generates an implication
constraint, so we end up with the following nested implication:
?x :: Char => (?x :: Char => ?x :: Char)
Note that the wanted (?x :: Char) constraint may be solved in
two incompatible ways: either by using the parameter from the
signature, or by using the local definition. Our intention is
that the local definition should "shadow" the parameter of the
signature, and we implement this as follows: when we add a new
*given* implicit parameter to the inert set, it replaces any existing
givens for the same implicit parameter.
This works for the normal cases but it has an odd side effect
in some pathological programs like this:
-- This is accepted, the second parameter shadows
f1 :: (?x :: Int, ?x :: Char) => Char
f1 = ?x
-- This is rejected, the second parameter shadows
f2 :: (?x :: Int, ?x :: Char) => Int
f2 = ?x
Both of these are actually wrong: when we try to use either one,
we'll get two incompatible wnated constraints (?x :: Int, ?x :: Char),
which would lead to an error.
I can think of two ways to fix this:
1. Simply disallow multiple constratits for the same implicit
parameter---this is never useful, and it can be detected completely
syntactically.
2. Move the shadowing machinery to the location where we nest
implications, and add some code here that will produce an
error if we get multiple givens for the same implicit parameter.
*********************************************************************************
* *
interactFunEq
* *
*********************************************************************************
\begin{code}
interactFunEq :: InertCans -> Ct -> TcS (Maybe InertCans, StopNowFlag)
interactFunEq inerts workItem@(CFunEqCan { cc_ev = ev, cc_fun = tc
, cc_tyargs = args, cc_rhs = rhs })
| (CFunEqCan { cc_ev = ev_i, cc_rhs = rhs_i } : _) <- matching_inerts
, ev_i `canRewrite` ev
= do { traceTcS "interact with inerts: FunEq/FunEq" $
vcat [ text "workItem =" <+> ppr workItem
, text "inertItem=" <+> ppr ev_i ]
; solveFunEq ev_i rhs_i ev rhs
; return (Nothing, True) }
| (ev_i : _) <- [ ev_i | CFunEqCan { cc_ev = ev_i, cc_rhs = rhs_i } <- matching_inerts
, rhs_i `tcEqType` rhs
, ev_i `canRewriteOrSame` ev ]
= do { when (isWanted ev) (setEvBind (ctev_evar ev) (ctEvTerm ev_i))
; return (Nothing, True) }
| eq_is@(eq_i : _) <- matching_inerts
, ev `canRewrite` ctEvidence eq_i
= do { let solve (CFunEqCan { cc_ev = ev_i, cc_rhs = rhs_i })
= solveFunEq ev rhs ev_i rhs_i
solve ct = pprPanic "interactFunEq" (ppr ct)
; mapM_ solve eq_is
; return (Just (inerts { inert_funeqs = replaceFunEqs funeqs tc args workItem }), True) }
| (CFunEqCan { cc_rhs = rhs_i } : _) <- matching_inerts
=
do { mb <- newDerived loc (mkTcEqPred rhs_i rhs)
; case mb of
Just x -> updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListEq (mkNonCanonical x))
Nothing -> return ()
; return (Nothing, False) }
| Just ops <- isBuiltInSynFamTyCon_maybe tc
= do { let is = findFunEqsByTyCon funeqs tc
; traceTcS "builtInCandidates: " $ ppr is
; let interact = sfInteractInert ops args rhs
; impMbs <- sequence
[ do mb <- newDerived (ctev_loc iev) (mkTcEqPred lhs_ty rhs_ty)
case mb of
Just x -> return $ Just $ mkNonCanonical x
Nothing -> return Nothing
| CFunEqCan { cc_tyargs = iargs
, cc_rhs = ixi
, cc_ev = iev } <- is
, Pair lhs_ty rhs_ty <- interact iargs ixi
]
; let imps = catMaybes impMbs
; unless (null imps) $ updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListEqs imps)
; return (Nothing, False) }
| otherwise
= return (Nothing, False)
where
funeqs = inert_funeqs inerts
matching_inerts = findFunEqs funeqs tc args
loc = ctev_loc ev
interactFunEq _ wi = pprPanic "interactFunEq" (ppr wi)
solveFunEq :: CtEvidence
-> Type
-> CtEvidence
-> Type
-> TcS ()
solveFunEq from_this xi1 solve_this xi2
= do { ctevs <- xCtEvidence solve_this xev
; emitWorkNC ctevs }
where
from_this_co = evTermCoercion $ ctEvTerm from_this
xev = XEvTerm [mkTcEqPred xi2 xi1] xcomp xdecomp
xcomp [x] = EvCoercion (from_this_co `mkTcTransCo` mk_sym_co x)
xcomp _ = panic "No more goals!"
xdecomp x = [EvCoercion (mk_sym_co x `mkTcTransCo` from_this_co)]
mk_sym_co x = mkTcSymCo (evTermCoercion x)
\end{code}
Note [Cache-caused loops]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It is very dangerous to cache a rewritten wanted family equation as 'solved' in our
solved cache (which is the default behaviour or xCtEvidence), because the interaction
may not be contributing towards a solution. Here is an example:
Initial inert set:
[W] g1 : F a ~ beta1
Work item:
[W] g2 : F a ~ beta2
The work item will react with the inert yielding the _same_ inert set plus:
i) Will set g2 := g1 `cast` g3
ii) Will add to our solved cache that [S] g2 : F a ~ beta2
iii) Will emit [W] g3 : beta1 ~ beta2
Now, the g3 work item will be spontaneously solved to [G] g3 : beta1 ~ beta2
and then it will react the item in the inert ([W] g1 : F a ~ beta1). So it
will set
g1 := g ; sym g3
and what is g? Well it would ideally be a new goal of type (F a ~ beta2) but
remember that we have this in our solved cache, and it is ... g2! In short we
created the evidence loop:
g2 := g1 ; g3
g3 := refl
g1 := g2 ; sym g3
To avoid this situation we do not cache as solved any workitems (or inert)
which did not really made a 'step' towards proving some goal. Solved's are
just an optimization so we don't lose anything in terms of completeness of
solving.
Note [Efficient Orientation]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suppose we are interacting two FunEqCans with the same LHS:
(inert) ci :: (F ty ~ xi_i)
(work) cw :: (F ty ~ xi_w)
We prefer to keep the inert (else we pass the work item on down
the pipeline, which is a bit silly). If we keep the inert, we
will (a) discharge 'cw'
(b) produce a new equality work-item (xi_w ~ xi_i)
Notice the orientation (xi_w ~ xi_i) NOT (xi_i ~ xi_w):
new_work :: xi_w ~ xi_i
cw := ci ; sym new_work
Why? Consider the simplest case when xi1 is a type variable. If
we generate xi1~xi2, porcessing that constraint will kick out 'ci'.
If we generate xi2~xi1, there is less chance of that happening.
Of course it can and should still happen if xi1=a, xi1=Int, say.
But we want to avoid it happening needlessly.
Similarly, if we *can't* keep the inert item (because inert is Wanted,
and work is Given, say), we prefer to orient the new equality (xi_i ~
xi_w).
Note [Carefully solve the right CFunEqCan]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
---- OLD COMMENT, NOW NOT NEEDED
---- because we now allow multiple
---- wanted FunEqs with the same head
Consider the constraints
c1 :: F Int ~ a -- Arising from an application line 5
c2 :: F Int ~ Bool -- Arising from an application line 10
Suppose that 'a' is a unification variable, arising only from
flattening. So there is no error on line 5; it's just a flattening
variable. But there is (or might be) an error on line 10.
Two ways to combine them, leaving either (Plan A)
c1 :: F Int ~ a -- Arising from an application line 5
c3 :: a ~ Bool -- Arising from an application line 10
or (Plan B)
c2 :: F Int ~ Bool -- Arising from an application line 10
c4 :: a ~ Bool -- Arising from an application line 5
Plan A will unify c3, leaving c1 :: F Int ~ Bool as an error
on the *totally innocent* line 5. An example is test SimpleFail16
where the expected/actual message comes out backwards if we use
the wrong plan.
The second is the right thing to do. Hence the isMetaTyVarTy
test when solving pairwise CFunEqCan.
*********************************************************************************
* *
interactTyVarEq
* *
*********************************************************************************
\begin{code}
interactTyVarEq :: InertCans -> Ct -> TcS (Maybe InertCans, StopNowFlag)
interactTyVarEq inerts workItem@(CTyEqCan { cc_tyvar = tv, cc_rhs = rhs , cc_ev = ev })
| (ev_i : _) <- [ ev_i | CTyEqCan { cc_ev = ev_i, cc_rhs = rhs_i }
<- findTyEqs (inert_eqs inerts) tv
, ev_i `canRewriteOrSame` ev
, rhs_i `tcEqType` rhs ]
=
do { when (isWanted ev) (setEvBind (ctev_evar ev) (ctEvTerm ev_i))
; traceFireTcS workItem (ptext (sLit "Solved from inert"))
; return (Nothing, True) }
| Just tv_rhs <- getTyVar_maybe rhs
, (ev_i : _) <- [ ev_i | CTyEqCan { cc_ev = ev_i, cc_rhs = rhs_i }
<- findTyEqs (inert_eqs inerts) tv_rhs
, ev_i `canRewriteOrSame` ev
, rhs_i `tcEqType` mkTyVarTy tv ]
=
do { when (isWanted ev) (setEvBind (ctev_evar ev)
(EvCoercion (mkTcSymCo (evTermCoercion (ctEvTerm ev_i)))))
; traceFireTcS workItem (ptext (sLit "Solved from inert (r)"))
; return (Nothing, True) }
| otherwise
= do { mb_solved <- trySpontaneousSolve ev tv rhs
; case mb_solved of
SPCantSolve
-> do { untch <- getUntouchables
; traceTcS "Can't solve tyvar equality"
(vcat [ text "LHS:" <+> ppr tv <+> dcolon <+> ppr (tyVarKind tv)
, ppWhen (isMetaTyVar tv) $
nest 4 (text "Untouchable level of" <+> ppr tv
<+> text "is" <+> ppr (metaTyVarUntouchables tv))
, text "RHS:" <+> ppr rhs <+> dcolon <+> ppr (typeKind rhs)
, text "Untouchables =" <+> ppr untch ])
; (n_kicked, inerts') <- kickOutRewritable ev tv inerts
; traceFireTcS workItem $
ptext (sLit "Kept as inert") <+> ppr_kicked n_kicked
; return (Just (addInertCan inerts' workItem), True) }
SPSolved new_tv
-> do { (n_kicked, inerts') <- kickOutRewritable givenFlavour new_tv inerts
; traceFireTcS workItem $
ptext (sLit "Spontaneously solved") <+> ppr_kicked n_kicked
; return (Just inerts', True) } }
interactTyVarEq _ wi = pprPanic "interactTyVarEq" (ppr wi)
givenFlavour :: CtEvidence
givenFlavour = CtGiven { ctev_pred = panic "givenFlavour:ev"
, ctev_evtm = panic "givenFlavour:tm"
, ctev_loc = panic "givenFlavour:loc" }
ppr_kicked :: Int -> SDoc
ppr_kicked 0 = empty
ppr_kicked n = parens (int n <+> ptext (sLit "kicked out"))
\end{code}
Note [Spontaneously solved in TyBinds]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When we encounter a constraint ([W] alpha ~ tau) which can be spontaneously solved,
we record the equality on the TyBinds of the TcSMonad. In the past, we used to also
add a /given/ version of the constraint ([G] alpha ~ tau) to the inert
canonicals -- and potentially kick out other equalities that mention alpha.
Then, the flattener only had to look in the inert equalities during flattening of a
type (TcCanonical.flattenTyVar).
However it is a bit silly to record these equalities /both/ in the inerts AND the
TyBinds, so we have now eliminated spontaneously solved equalities from the inerts,
and only record them in the TyBinds of the TcS monad. The flattener is now consulting
these binds /and/ the inerts for potentially unsolved or other given equalities.
\begin{code}
kickOutRewritable :: CtEvidence
-> TcTyVar
-> InertCans
-> TcS (Int, InertCans)
kickOutRewritable new_ev new_tv
(IC { inert_eqs = tv_eqs
, inert_dicts = dictmap
, inert_funeqs = funeqmap
, inert_irreds = irreds
, inert_insols = insols
, inert_no_eqs = no_eqs })
= do { traceTcS "kickOutRewritable" $
vcat [ text "tv = " <+> ppr new_tv
, ptext (sLit "Kicked out =") <+> ppr kicked_out]
; updWorkListTcS (appendWorkList kicked_out)
; return (workListSize kicked_out, inert_cans_in) }
where
inert_cans_in = IC { inert_eqs = tv_eqs_in
, inert_dicts = dicts_in
, inert_funeqs = feqs_in
, inert_irreds = irs_in
, inert_insols = insols_in
, inert_no_eqs = no_eqs }
kicked_out = WorkList { wl_eqs = tv_eqs_out
, wl_funeqs = foldrBag insertDeque emptyDeque feqs_out
, wl_rest = bagToList (dicts_out `andCts` irs_out
`andCts` insols_out) }
(tv_eqs_out, tv_eqs_in) = foldVarEnv kick_out_eqs ([], emptyVarEnv) tv_eqs
(feqs_out, feqs_in) = partitionFunEqs kick_out_ct funeqmap
(dicts_out, dicts_in) = partitionDicts kick_out_ct dictmap
(irs_out, irs_in) = partitionBag kick_out_irred irreds
(insols_out, insols_in) = partitionBag kick_out_ct insols
kick_out_ct :: Ct -> Bool
kick_out_ct ct = new_ev `canRewrite` ctEvidence ct
&& new_tv `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfCt ct
kick_out_irred :: Ct -> Bool
kick_out_irred ct = new_ev `canRewrite` ctEvidence ct
&& new_tv `elemVarSet` closeOverKinds (tyVarsOfCt ct)
kick_out_eqs :: EqualCtList -> ([Ct], TyVarEnv EqualCtList)
-> ([Ct], TyVarEnv EqualCtList)
kick_out_eqs eqs (acc_out, acc_in)
= (eqs_out ++ acc_out, case eqs_in of
[] -> acc_in
(eq1:_) -> extendVarEnv acc_in (cc_tyvar eq1) eqs_in)
where
(eqs_out, eqs_in) = partition kick_out_eq eqs
kick_out_eq :: Ct -> Bool
kick_out_eq (CTyEqCan { cc_tyvar = tv, cc_rhs = rhs, cc_ev = ev })
= (new_ev `canRewrite` ev)
&& (new_tv `elemVarSet` kind_vars ||
(not (ev `canRewrite` new_ev) &&
new_tv `elemVarSet` (extendVarSet (tyVarsOfType rhs) tv)))
where
kind_vars = tyVarsOfType (tyVarKind tv) `unionVarSet`
tyVarsOfType (typeKind rhs)
kick_out_eq other_ct = pprPanic "kick_out_eq" (ppr other_ct)
\end{code}
Note [Kicking out inert constraints]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Given a new (a -> ty) inert, we want to kick out an existing inert
constraint if
a) the new constraint can rewrite the inert one
b) 'a' is free in the inert constraint (so that it *will*)
rewrite it if we kick it out.
For (b) we use tyVarsOfCt, which returns the type variables /and
the kind variables/ that are directly visible in the type. Hence we
will have exposed all the rewriting we care about to make the most
precise kinds visible for matching classes etc. No need to kick out
constraints that mention type variables whose kinds contain this
variable! (Except see Note [Kicking out Irreds].)
Note [Kicking out Irreds]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
There is an awkward special case for Irreds. When we have a
kind-mis-matched equality constraint (a:k1) ~ (ty:k2), we turn it into
an Irred (see Note [Equalities with incompatible kinds] in
TcCanonical). So in this case the free kind variables of k1 and k2
are not visible. More precisely, the type looks like
(~) k1 (a:k1) (ty:k2)
because (~) has kind forall k. k -> k -> Constraint. So the constraint
itself is ill-kinded. We can "see" k1 but not k2. That's why we use
closeOverKinds to make sure we see k2.
This is not pretty. Maybe (~) should have kind
(~) :: forall k1 k1. k1 -> k2 -> Constraint
Note [Kick out insolubles]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Suppose we have an insoluble alpha ~ [alpha], which is insoluble
because an occurs check. And then we unify alpha := [Int].
Then we really want to rewrite the insouluble to [Int] ~ [[Int]].
Now it can be decomposed. Otherwise we end up with a "Can't match
[Int] ~ [[Int]]" which is true, but a bit confusing because the
outer type constructors match.
Note [Delicate equality kick-out]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When adding an equality (a ~ xi), we kick out an inert type-variable
equality (b ~ phi) in two cases
(1) If the new tyvar appears in the kind vars of the LHS or RHS of
the inert. Example:
Work item: [G] k ~ *
Inert: [W] (a:k) ~ ty
[W] (b:*) ~ c :: k
We must kick out those blocked inerts so that we rewrite them
and can subsequently unify.
(2) If the new tyvar appears in the RHS of the inert
AND the inert cannot rewrite the work item
Work item: [G] a ~ b
Inert: [W] b ~ [a]
Now at this point the work item cannot be further rewritten by the
inert (due to the weaker inert flavor). But we can't add the work item
as-is because the inert set would then have a cyclic substitution,
when rewriting a wanted type mentioning 'a'. So we must kick the inert out.
We have to do this only if the inert *cannot* rewrite the work item;
it it can, then the work item will have been fully rewritten by the
inert set during canonicalisation. So for example:
Work item: [W] a ~ Int
Inert: [W] b ~ [a]
No need to kick out the inert, beause the inert substitution is not
necessarily idemopotent. See Note [Non-idempotent inert substitution].
See also Note [Detailed InertCans Invariants]
\begin{code}
data SPSolveResult = SPCantSolve
| SPSolved TcTyVar
trySpontaneousSolve :: CtEvidence -> TcTyVar -> Xi -> TcS SPSolveResult
trySpontaneousSolve gw tv1 xi
| isGiven gw
= return SPCantSolve
| Just tv2 <- tcGetTyVar_maybe xi
= do { tch1 <- isTouchableMetaTyVarTcS tv1
; tch2 <- isTouchableMetaTyVarTcS tv2
; case (tch1, tch2) of
(True, True) -> trySpontaneousEqTwoWay gw tv1 tv2
(True, False) -> trySpontaneousEqOneWay gw tv1 xi
(False, True) -> trySpontaneousEqOneWay gw tv2 (mkTyVarTy tv1)
_ -> return SPCantSolve }
| otherwise
= do { tch1 <- isTouchableMetaTyVarTcS tv1
; if tch1 then trySpontaneousEqOneWay gw tv1 xi
else return SPCantSolve }
trySpontaneousEqOneWay :: CtEvidence -> TcTyVar -> Xi -> TcS SPSolveResult
trySpontaneousEqOneWay gw tv xi
| not (isSigTyVar tv) || isTyVarTy xi
, typeKind xi `tcIsSubKind` tyVarKind tv
= solveWithIdentity gw tv xi
| otherwise
= return SPCantSolve
trySpontaneousEqTwoWay :: CtEvidence -> TcTyVar -> TcTyVar -> TcS SPSolveResult
trySpontaneousEqTwoWay gw tv1 tv2
| k1 `tcIsSubKind` k2 && nicer_to_update_tv2
= solveWithIdentity gw tv2 (mkTyVarTy tv1)
| k2 `tcIsSubKind` k1
= solveWithIdentity gw tv1 (mkTyVarTy tv2)
| otherwise
= return SPCantSolve
where
k1 = tyVarKind tv1
k2 = tyVarKind tv2
nicer_to_update_tv2 = isSigTyVar tv1 || isSystemName (Var.varName tv2)
\end{code}
Note [Avoid double unifications]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The spontaneous solver has to return a given which mentions the unified unification
variable *on the left* of the equality. Here is what happens if not:
Original wanted: (a ~ alpha), (alpha ~ Int)
We spontaneously solve the first wanted, without changing the order!
given : a ~ alpha [having unified alpha := a]
Now the second wanted comes along, but he cannot rewrite the given, so we simply continue.
At the end we spontaneously solve that guy, *reunifying* [alpha := Int]
We avoid this problem by orienting the resulting given so that the unification
variable is on the left. [Note that alternatively we could attempt to
enforce this at canonicalization]
See also Note [No touchables as FunEq RHS] in TcSMonad; avoiding
double unifications is the main reason we disallow touchable
unification variables as RHS of type family equations: F xis ~ alpha.
\begin{code}
solveWithIdentity :: CtEvidence -> TcTyVar -> Xi -> TcS SPSolveResult
solveWithIdentity wd tv xi
= do { let tv_ty = mkTyVarTy tv
; traceTcS "Sneaky unification:" $
vcat [text "Unifies:" <+> ppr tv <+> ptext (sLit ":=") <+> ppr xi,
text "Coercion:" <+> pprEq tv_ty xi,
text "Left Kind is:" <+> ppr (typeKind tv_ty),
text "Right Kind is:" <+> ppr (typeKind xi) ]
; let xi' = defaultKind xi
; setWantedTyBind tv xi'
; let refl_evtm = EvCoercion (mkTcNomReflCo xi')
; when (isWanted wd) $
setEvBind (ctev_evar wd) refl_evtm
; return (SPSolved tv) }
\end{code}
Note [Superclasses and recursive dictionaries]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Overlaps with Note [SUPERCLASS-LOOP 1]
Note [SUPERCLASS-LOOP 2]
Note [Recursive instances and superclases]
ToDo: check overlap and delete redundant stuff
Right before adding a given into the inert set, we must
produce some more work, that will bring the superclasses
of the given into scope. The superclass constraints go into
our worklist.
When we simplify a wanted constraint, if we first see a matching
instance, we may produce new wanted work. To (1) avoid doing this work
twice in the future and (2) to handle recursive dictionaries we may ``cache''
this item as given into our inert set WITHOUT adding its superclass constraints,
otherwise we'd be in danger of creating a loop [In fact this was the exact reason
for doing the isGoodRecEv check in an older version of the type checker].
But now we have added partially solved constraints to the worklist which may
interact with other wanteds. Consider the example:
Example 1:
class Eq b => Foo a b --- 0-th selector
instance Eq a => Foo [a] a --- fooDFun
and wanted (Foo [t] t). We are first going to see that the instance matches
and create an inert set that includes the solved (Foo [t] t) but not its superclasses:
d1 :_g Foo [t] t d1 := EvDFunApp fooDFun d3
Our work list is going to contain a new *wanted* goal
d3 :_w Eq t
Ok, so how do we get recursive dictionaries, at all:
Example 2:
data D r = ZeroD | SuccD (r (D r));
instance (Eq (r (D r))) => Eq (D r) where
ZeroD == ZeroD = True
(SuccD a) == (SuccD b) = a == b
_ == _ = False;
equalDC :: D [] -> D [] -> Bool;
equalDC = (==);
We need to prove (Eq (D [])). Here's how we go:
d1 :_w Eq (D [])
by instance decl, holds if
d2 :_w Eq [D []]
where d1 = dfEqD d2
*BUT* we have an inert set which gives us (no superclasses):
d1 :_g Eq (D [])
By the instance declaration of Eq we can show the 'd2' goal if
d3 :_w Eq (D [])
where d2 = dfEqList d3
d1 = dfEqD d2
Now, however this wanted can interact with our inert d1 to set:
d3 := d1
and solve the goal. Why was this interaction OK? Because, if we chase the
evidence of d1 ~~> dfEqD d2 ~~-> dfEqList d3, so by setting d3 := d1 we
are really setting
d3 := dfEqD2 (dfEqList d3)
which is FINE because the use of d3 is protected by the instance function
applications.
So, our strategy is to try to put solved wanted dictionaries into the
inert set along with their superclasses (when this is meaningful,
i.e. when new wanted goals are generated) but solve a wanted dictionary
from a given only in the case where the evidence variable of the
wanted is mentioned in the evidence of the given (recursively through
the evidence binds) in a protected way: more instance function applications
than superclass selectors.
Here are some more examples from GHC's previous type checker
Example 3:
This code arises in the context of "Scrap Your Boilerplate with Class"
class Sat a
class Data ctx a
instance Sat (ctx Char) => Data ctx Char -- dfunData1
instance (Sat (ctx [a]), Data ctx a) => Data ctx [a] -- dfunData2
class Data Maybe a => Foo a
instance Foo t => Sat (Maybe t) -- dfunSat
instance Data Maybe a => Foo a -- dfunFoo1
instance Foo a => Foo [a] -- dfunFoo2
instance Foo [Char] -- dfunFoo3
Consider generating the superclasses of the instance declaration
instance Foo a => Foo [a]
So our problem is this
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_w Data Maybe [t]
We may add the given in the inert set, along with its superclasses
[assuming we don't fail because there is a matching instance, see
topReactionsStage, given case ]
Inert:
d0 :_g Foo t
WorkList
d01 :_g Data Maybe t -- d2 := EvDictSuperClass d0 0
d1 :_w Data Maybe [t]
Then d2 can readily enter the inert, and we also do solving of the wanted
Inert:
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_s Data Maybe [t] d1 := dfunData2 d2 d3
WorkList
d2 :_w Sat (Maybe [t])
d3 :_w Data Maybe t
d01 :_g Data Maybe t
Now, we may simplify d2 more:
Inert:
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_s Data Maybe [t] d1 := dfunData2 d2 d3
d1 :_g Data Maybe [t]
d2 :_g Sat (Maybe [t]) d2 := dfunSat d4
WorkList:
d3 :_w Data Maybe t
d4 :_w Foo [t]
d01 :_g Data Maybe t
Now, we can just solve d3.
Inert
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_s Data Maybe [t] d1 := dfunData2 d2 d3
d2 :_g Sat (Maybe [t]) d2 := dfunSat d4
WorkList
d4 :_w Foo [t]
d01 :_g Data Maybe t
And now we can simplify d4 again, but since it has superclasses we *add* them to the worklist:
Inert
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_s Data Maybe [t] d1 := dfunData2 d2 d3
d2 :_g Sat (Maybe [t]) d2 := dfunSat d4
d4 :_g Foo [t] d4 := dfunFoo2 d5
WorkList:
d5 :_w Foo t
d6 :_g Data Maybe [t] d6 := EvDictSuperClass d4 0
d01 :_g Data Maybe t
Now, d5 can be solved! (and its superclass enter scope)
Inert
d0 :_g Foo t
d1 :_s Data Maybe [t] d1 := dfunData2 d2 d3
d2 :_g Sat (Maybe [t]) d2 := dfunSat d4
d4 :_g Foo [t] d4 := dfunFoo2 d5
d5 :_g Foo t d5 := dfunFoo1 d7
WorkList:
d7 :_w Data Maybe t
d6 :_g Data Maybe [t]
d8 :_g Data Maybe t d8 := EvDictSuperClass d5 0
d01 :_g Data Maybe t
Now, two problems:
[1] Suppose we pick d8 and we react him with d01. Which of the two givens should
we keep? Well, we *MUST NOT* drop d01 because d8 contains recursive evidence
that must not be used (look at case interactInert where both inert and workitem
are givens). So we have several options:
- Drop the workitem always (this will drop d8)
This feels very unsafe -- what if the work item was the "good" one
that should be used later to solve another wanted?
- Don't drop anyone: the inert set may contain multiple givens!
[This is currently implemented]
The "don't drop anyone" seems the most safe thing to do, so now we come to problem 2:
[2] We have added both d6 and d01 in the inert set, and we are interacting our wanted
d7. Now the [isRecDictEv] function in the ineration solver
[case inert-given workitem-wanted] will prevent us from interacting d7 := d8
precisely because chasing the evidence of d8 leads us to an unguarded use of d7.
So, no interaction happens there. Then we meet d01 and there is no recursion
problem there [isRectDictEv] gives us the OK to interact and we do solve d7 := d01!
Note [SUPERCLASS-LOOP 1]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We have to be very, very careful when generating superclasses, lest we
accidentally build a loop. Here's an example:
class S a
class S a => C a where { opc :: a -> a }
class S b => D b where { opd :: b -> b }
instance C Int where
opc = opd
instance D Int where
opd = opc
From (instance C Int) we get the constraint set {ds1:S Int, dd:D Int}
Simplifying, we may well get:
$dfCInt = :C ds1 (opd dd)
dd = $dfDInt
ds1 = $p1 dd
Notice that we spot that we can extract ds1 from dd.
Alas! Alack! We can do the same for (instance D Int):
$dfDInt = :D ds2 (opc dc)
dc = $dfCInt
ds2 = $p1 dc
And now we've defined the superclass in terms of itself.
Two more nasty cases are in
tcrun021
tcrun033
Solution:
- Satisfy the superclass context *all by itself*
(tcSimplifySuperClasses)
- And do so completely; i.e. no left-over constraints
to mix with the constraints arising from method declarations
Note [SUPERCLASS-LOOP 2]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We need to be careful when adding "the constaint we are trying to prove".
Suppose we are *given* d1:Ord a, and want to deduce (d2:C [a]) where
class Ord a => C a where
instance Ord [a] => C [a] where ...
Then we'll use the instance decl to deduce C [a] from Ord [a], and then add the
superclasses of C [a] to avails. But we must not overwrite the binding
for Ord [a] (which is obtained from Ord a) with a superclass selection or we'll just
build a loop!
Here's another variant, immortalised in tcrun020
class Monad m => C1 m
class C1 m => C2 m x
instance C2 Maybe Bool
For the instance decl we need to build (C1 Maybe), and it's no good if
we run around and add (C2 Maybe Bool) and its superclasses to the avails
before we search for C1 Maybe.
Here's another example
class Eq b => Foo a b
instance Eq a => Foo [a] a
If we are reducing
(Foo [t] t)
we'll first deduce that it holds (via the instance decl). We must not
then overwrite the Eq t constraint with a superclass selection!
At first I had a gross hack, whereby I simply did not add superclass constraints
in addWanted, though I did for addGiven and addIrred. This was sub-optimal,
because it lost legitimate superclass sharing, and it still didn't do the job:
I found a very obscure program (now tcrun021) in which improvement meant the
simplifier got two bites a the cherry... so something seemed to be an Stop
first time, but reducible next time.
Now we implement the Right Solution, which is to check for loops directly
when adding superclasses. It's a bit like the occurs check in unification.
Note [Recursive instances and superclases]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider this code, which arises in the context of "Scrap Your
Boilerplate with Class".
class Sat a
class Data ctx a
instance Sat (ctx Char) => Data ctx Char
instance (Sat (ctx [a]), Data ctx a) => Data ctx [a]
class Data Maybe a => Foo a
instance Foo t => Sat (Maybe t)
instance Data Maybe a => Foo a
instance Foo a => Foo [a]
instance Foo [Char]
In the instance for Foo [a], when generating evidence for the superclasses
(ie in tcSimplifySuperClasses) we need a superclass (Data Maybe [a]).
Using the instance for Data, we therefore need
(Sat (Maybe [a], Data Maybe a)
But we are given (Foo a), and hence its superclass (Data Maybe a).
So that leaves (Sat (Maybe [a])). Using the instance for Sat means
we need (Foo [a]). And that is the very dictionary we are bulding
an instance for! So we must put that in the "givens". So in this
case we have
Given: Foo a, Foo [a]
Wanted: Data Maybe [a]
BUT we must *not not not* put the *superclasses* of (Foo [a]) in
the givens, which is what 'addGiven' would normally do. Why? Because
(Data Maybe [a]) is the superclass, so we'd "satisfy" the wanted
by selecting a superclass from Foo [a], which simply makes a loop.
On the other hand we *must* put the superclasses of (Foo a) in
the givens, as you can see from the derivation described above.
Conclusion: in the very special case of tcSimplifySuperClasses
we have one 'given' (namely the "this" dictionary) whose superclasses
must not be added to 'givens' by addGiven.
There is a complication though. Suppose there are equalities
instance (Eq a, a~b) => Num (a,b)
Then we normalise the 'givens' wrt the equalities, so the original
given "this" dictionary is cast to one of a different type. So it's a
bit trickier than before to identify the "special" dictionary whose
superclasses must not be added. See test
indexed-types/should_run/EqInInstance
We need a persistent property of the dictionary to record this
special-ness. Current I'm using the InstLocOrigin (a bit of a hack,
but cool), which is maintained by dictionary normalisation.
Specifically, the InstLocOrigin is
NoScOrigin
then the no-superclass thing kicks in. WATCH OUT if you fiddle
with InstLocOrigin!
%************************************************************************
%* *
%* Functional dependencies, instantiation of equations
%* *
%************************************************************************
When we spot an equality arising from a functional dependency,
we now use that equality (a "wanted") to rewrite the work-item
constraint right away. This avoids two dangers
Danger 1: If we send the original constraint on down the pipeline
it may react with an instance declaration, and in delicate
situations (when a Given overlaps with an instance) that
may produce new insoluble goals: see Trac #4952
Danger 2: If we don't rewrite the constraint, it may re-react
with the same thing later, and produce the same equality
again --> termination worries.
To achieve this required some refactoring of FunDeps.lhs (nicer
now!).
\begin{code}
rewriteWithFunDeps :: [Equation] -> CtLoc -> TcS [Ct]
rewriteWithFunDeps eqn_pred_locs loc
= do { fd_cts <- mapM (instFunDepEqn loc) eqn_pred_locs
; return (concat fd_cts) }
instFunDepEqn :: CtLoc -> Equation -> TcS [Ct]
instFunDepEqn loc (FDEqn { fd_qtvs = tvs, fd_eqs = eqs })
= do { (subst, _) <- instFlexiTcS tvs
; foldM (do_one subst) [] eqs }
where
do_one subst ievs (FDEq { fd_ty_left = ty1, fd_ty_right = ty2 })
| tcEqType sty1 sty2
= return ievs
| otherwise
= do { mb_eqv <- newDerived loc (mkTcEqPred sty1 sty2)
; case mb_eqv of
Just ev -> return (mkNonCanonical (ev {ctev_loc = loc}) : ievs)
Nothing -> return ievs }
where
sty1 = Type.substTy subst ty1
sty2 = Type.substTy subst ty2
\end{code}
*********************************************************************************
* *
The top-reaction Stage
* *
*********************************************************************************
\begin{code}
topReactionsStage :: WorkItem -> TcS StopOrContinue
topReactionsStage wi
= do { inerts <- getTcSInerts
; tir <- doTopReact inerts wi
; case tir of
NoTopInt -> return (ContinueWith wi)
SomeTopInt rule what_next
-> do { traceFireTcS wi $
ptext (sLit "Top react:") <+> text rule
; return what_next } }
data TopInteractResult
= NoTopInt
| SomeTopInt { tir_rule :: String, tir_new_item :: StopOrContinue }
doTopReact :: InertSet -> WorkItem -> TcS TopInteractResult
doTopReact inerts workItem
= do { traceTcS "doTopReact" (ppr workItem)
; case workItem of
CDictCan { cc_ev = fl, cc_class = cls, cc_tyargs = xis }
-> doTopReactDict inerts fl cls xis
CFunEqCan { cc_ev = fl, cc_fun = tc, cc_tyargs = args , cc_rhs = xi }
-> doTopReactFunEq workItem fl tc args xi
_ ->
return NoTopInt }
doTopReactDict :: InertSet -> CtEvidence -> Class -> [Xi] -> TcS TopInteractResult
doTopReactDict inerts fl cls xis
| not (isWanted fl)
= try_fundeps_and_return
| Just ev <- lookupSolvedDict inerts cls xis
, ctEvCheckDepth (ctLocDepth (ctev_loc fl)) ev
= do { setEvBind dict_id (ctEvTerm ev);
; return $ SomeTopInt { tir_rule = "Dict/Top (cached)"
, tir_new_item = Stop } }
| otherwise
= do { lkup_inst_res <- matchClassInst inerts cls xis loc
; case lkup_inst_res of
GenInst wtvs ev_term -> do { addSolvedDict fl cls xis
; solve_from_instance wtvs ev_term }
NoInstance -> try_fundeps_and_return }
where
dict_id = ctEvId fl
pred = mkClassPred cls xis
loc = ctev_loc fl
solve_from_instance :: [CtEvidence] -> EvTerm -> TcS TopInteractResult
solve_from_instance evs ev_term
| null evs
= do { traceTcS "doTopReact/found nullary instance for" $
ppr dict_id
; setEvBind dict_id ev_term
; return $
SomeTopInt { tir_rule = "Dict/Top (solved, no new work)"
, tir_new_item = Stop } }
| otherwise
= do { traceTcS "doTopReact/found non-nullary instance for" $
ppr dict_id
; setEvBind dict_id ev_term
; let mk_new_wanted ev
= mkNonCanonical (ev {ctev_loc = bumpCtLocDepth CountConstraints loc })
; updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListCts (map mk_new_wanted evs))
; return $
SomeTopInt { tir_rule = "Dict/Top (solved, more work)"
, tir_new_item = Stop } }
try_fundeps_and_return
= do { instEnvs <- getInstEnvs
; let fd_eqns = improveFromInstEnv instEnvs pred
; fd_work <- rewriteWithFunDeps fd_eqns loc
; unless (null fd_work) (updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListEqs fd_work))
; return NoTopInt }
doTopReactFunEq :: Ct -> CtEvidence -> TyCon -> [Xi] -> Xi -> TcS TopInteractResult
doTopReactFunEq _ct fl fun_tc args xi
= ASSERT(isSynFamilyTyCon fun_tc)
do { fun_eq_cache <- getTcSInerts >>= (return . inert_solved_funeqs)
; case findFunEq fun_eq_cache fun_tc args of {
Just (ctev, rhs_ty)
| ctev `canRewriteOrSame` fl
-> ASSERT( not (isDerived ctev) )
succeed_with "Fun/Cache" (evTermCoercion (ctEvTerm ctev)) rhs_ty ;
_other ->
do { match_res <- matchFam fun_tc args
; case match_res of {
Nothing -> do { try_improvement; return NoTopInt } ;
Just (co, ty) ->
do {
unless (isDerived fl) (addSolvedFunEq fun_tc args fl xi)
; succeed_with "Fun/Top" co ty } } } } }
where
loc = ctev_loc fl
try_improvement
| Just ops <- isBuiltInSynFamTyCon_maybe fun_tc
= do { let eqns = sfInteractTop ops args xi
; impsMb <- mapM (\(Pair x y) -> newDerived loc (mkTcEqPred x y)) eqns
; let work = map mkNonCanonical (catMaybes impsMb)
; unless (null work) (updWorkListTcS (extendWorkListEqs work)) }
| otherwise
= return ()
succeed_with :: String -> TcCoercion -> TcType -> TcS TopInteractResult
succeed_with str co rhs_ty
= do { ctevs <- xCtEvidence fl xev
; traceTcS ("doTopReactFunEq " ++ str) (ppr ctevs)
; case ctevs of
[ctev] -> updWorkListTcS $ extendWorkListEq $
mkNonCanonical (ctev { ctev_loc = bumpCtLocDepth CountTyFunApps loc })
ctevs ->
ASSERT( null ctevs) return ()
; return $ SomeTopInt { tir_rule = str
, tir_new_item = Stop } }
where
xdecomp x = [EvCoercion (mkTcSymCo co `mkTcTransCo` evTermCoercion x)]
xcomp [x] = EvCoercion (co `mkTcTransCo` evTermCoercion x)
xcomp _ = panic "No more goals!"
xev = XEvTerm [mkTcEqPred rhs_ty xi] xcomp xdecomp
\end{code}
Note [Cached solved FunEqs]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When trying to solve, say (FunExpensive big-type ~ ty), it's important
to see if we have reduced (FunExpensive big-type) before, lest we
simply repeat it. Hence the lookup in inert_solved_funeqs. Moreover
we must use `canRewriteOrSame` because both uses might (say) be Wanteds,
and we *still* want to save the re-computation.
Note [MATCHING-SYNONYMS]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
When trying to match a dictionary (D tau) to a top-level instance, or a
type family equation (F taus_1 ~ tau_2) to a top-level family instance,
we do *not* need to expand type synonyms because the matcher will do that for us.
Note [RHS-FAMILY-SYNONYMS]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The RHS of a family instance is represented as yet another constructor which is
like a type synonym for the real RHS the programmer declared. Eg:
type instance F (a,a) = [a]
Becomes:
:R32 a = [a] -- internal type synonym introduced
F (a,a) ~ :R32 a -- instance
When we react a family instance with a type family equation in the work list
we keep the synonym-using RHS without expansion.
Note [FunDep and implicit parameter reactions]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Currently, our story of interacting two dictionaries (or a dictionary
and top-level instances) for functional dependencies, and implicit
paramters, is that we simply produce new Derived equalities. So for example
class D a b | a -> b where ...
Inert:
d1 :g D Int Bool
WorkItem:
d2 :w D Int alpha
We generate the extra work item
cv :d alpha ~ Bool
where 'cv' is currently unused. However, this new item can perhaps be
spontaneously solved to become given and react with d2,
discharging it in favour of a new constraint d2' thus:
d2' :w D Int Bool
d2 := d2' |> D Int cv
Now d2' can be discharged from d1
We could be more aggressive and try to *immediately* solve the dictionary
using those extra equalities, but that requires those equalities to carry
evidence and derived do not carry evidence.
If that were the case with the same inert set and work item we might dischard
d2 directly:
cv :w alpha ~ Bool
d2 := d1 |> D Int cv
But in general it's a bit painful to figure out the necessary coercion,
so we just take the first approach. Here is a better example. Consider:
class C a b c | a -> b
And:
[Given] d1 : C T Int Char
[Wanted] d2 : C T beta Int
In this case, it's *not even possible* to solve the wanted immediately.
So we should simply output the functional dependency and add this guy
[but NOT its superclasses] back in the worklist. Even worse:
[Given] d1 : C T Int beta
[Wanted] d2: C T beta Int
Then it is solvable, but its very hard to detect this on the spot.
It's exactly the same with implicit parameters, except that the
"aggressive" approach would be much easier to implement.
Note [When improvement happens]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
We fire an improvement rule when
* Two constraints match (modulo the fundep)
e.g. C t1 t2, C t1 t3 where C a b | a->b
The two match because the first arg is identical
Note that we *do* fire the improvement if one is Given and one is Derived (e.g. a
superclass of a Wanted goal) or if both are Given.
Example (tcfail138)
class L a b | a -> b
class (G a, L a b) => C a b
instance C a b' => G (Maybe a)
instance C a b => C (Maybe a) a
instance L (Maybe a) a
When solving the superclasses of the (C (Maybe a) a) instance, we get
Given: C a b ... and hance by superclasses, (G a, L a b)
Wanted: G (Maybe a)
Use the instance decl to get
Wanted: C a b'
The (C a b') is inert, so we generate its Derived superclasses (L a b'),
and now we need improvement between that derived superclass an the Given (L a b)
Test typecheck/should_fail/FDsFromGivens also shows why it's a good idea to
emit Derived FDs for givens as well.
Note [Weird fundeps]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider class Het a b | a -> b where
het :: m (f c) -> a -> m b
class GHet (a :: * -> *) (b :: * -> *) | a -> b
instance GHet (K a) (K [a])
instance Het a b => GHet (K a) (K b)
The two instances don't actually conflict on their fundeps,
although it's pretty strange. So they are both accepted. Now
try [W] GHet (K Int) (K Bool)
This triggers fudeps from both instance decls; but it also
matches a *unique* instance decl, and we should go ahead and
pick that one right now. Otherwise, if we don't, it ends up
unsolved in the inert set and is reported as an error.
Trac #7875 is a case in point.
Note [Overriding implicit parameters]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Consider
f :: (?x::a) -> Bool -> a
g v = let ?x::Int = 3
in (f v, let ?x::Bool = True in f v)
This should probably be well typed, with
g :: Bool -> (Int, Bool)
So the inner binding for ?x::Bool *overrides* the outer one.
Hence a work-item Given overrides an inert-item Given.
Note [Given constraint that matches an instance declaration]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
What should we do when we discover that one (or more) top-level
instances match a given (or solved) class constraint? We have
two possibilities:
1. Reject the program. The reason is that there may not be a unique
best strategy for the solver. Example, from the OutsideIn(X) paper:
instance P x => Q [x]
instance (x ~ y) => R [x] y
wob :: forall a b. (Q [b], R b a) => a -> Int
g :: forall a. Q [a] => [a] -> Int
g x = wob x
will generate the impliation constraint:
Q [a] => (Q [beta], R beta [a])
If we react (Q [beta]) with its top-level axiom, we end up with a
(P beta), which we have no way of discharging. On the other hand,
if we react R beta [a] with the top-level we get (beta ~ a), which
is solvable and can help us rewrite (Q [beta]) to (Q [a]) which is
now solvable by the given Q [a].
However, this option is restrictive, for instance [Example 3] from
Note [Recursive instances and superclases] will fail to work.
2. Ignore the problem, hoping that the situations where there exist indeed
such multiple strategies are rare: Indeed the cause of the previous
problem is that (R [x] y) yields the new work (x ~ y) which can be
*spontaneously* solved, not using the givens.
We are choosing option 2 below but we might consider having a flag as well.
Note [New Wanted Superclass Work]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Even in the case of wanted constraints, we may add some superclasses
as new given work. The reason is:
To allow FD-like improvement for type families. Assume that
we have a class
class C a b | a -> b
and we have to solve the implication constraint:
C a b => C a beta
Then, FD improvement can help us to produce a new wanted (beta ~ b)
We want to have the same effect with the type family encoding of
functional dependencies. Namely, consider:
class (F a ~ b) => C a b
Now suppose that we have:
given: C a b
wanted: C a beta
By interacting the given we will get given (F a ~ b) which is not
enough by itself to make us discharge (C a beta). However, we
may create a new derived equality from the super-class of the
wanted constraint (C a beta), namely derived (F a ~ beta).
Now we may interact this with given (F a ~ b) to get:
derived : beta ~ b
But 'beta' is a touchable unification variable, and hence OK to
unify it with 'b', replacing the derived evidence with the identity.
This requires trySpontaneousSolve to solve *derived*
equalities that have a touchable in their RHS, *in addition*
to solving wanted equalities.
We also need to somehow use the superclasses to quantify over a minimal,
constraint see note [Minimize by Superclasses] in TcSimplify.
Finally, here is another example where this is useful.
Example 1:
----------
class (F a ~ b) => C a b
And we are given the wanteds:
w1 : C a b
w2 : C a c
w3 : b ~ c
We surely do *not* want to quantify over (b ~ c), since if someone provides
dictionaries for (C a b) and (C a c), these dictionaries can provide a proof
of (b ~ c), hence no extra evidence is necessary. Here is what will happen:
Step 1: We will get new *given* superclass work,
provisionally to our solving of w1 and w2
g1: F a ~ b, g2 : F a ~ c,
w1 : C a b, w2 : C a c, w3 : b ~ c
The evidence for g1 and g2 is a superclass evidence term:
g1 := sc w1, g2 := sc w2
Step 2: The givens will solve the wanted w3, so that
w3 := sym (sc w1) ; sc w2
Step 3: Now, one may naively assume that then w2 can be solve from w1
after rewriting with the (now solved equality) (b ~ c).
But this rewriting is ruled out by the isGoodRectDict!
Conclusion, we will (correctly) end up with the unsolved goals
(C a b, C a c)
NB: The desugarer needs be more clever to deal with equalities
that participate in recursive dictionary bindings.
\begin{code}
data LookupInstResult
= NoInstance
| GenInst [CtEvidence] EvTerm
instance Outputable LookupInstResult where
ppr NoInstance = text "NoInstance"
ppr (GenInst ev t) = text "GenInst" <+> ppr ev <+> ppr t
matchClassInst :: InertSet -> Class -> [Type] -> CtLoc -> TcS LookupInstResult
matchClassInst _ clas [ ty ] _
| className clas == knownNatClassName
, Just n <- isNumLitTy ty = makeDict (EvNum n)
| className clas == knownSymbolClassName
, Just s <- isStrLitTy ty = makeDict (EvStr s)
where
makeDict evLit =
case unwrapNewTyCon_maybe (classTyCon clas) of
Just (_,_, axDict)
| [ meth ] <- classMethods clas
, Just tcRep <- tyConAppTyCon_maybe
$ funResultTy
$ dropForAlls
$ idType meth
, Just (_,_,axRep) <- unwrapNewTyCon_maybe tcRep
-> return $
let co1 = mkTcSymCo $ mkTcUnbranchedAxInstCo Representational axRep [ty]
co2 = mkTcSymCo $ mkTcUnbranchedAxInstCo Representational axDict [ty]
in GenInst [] $ mkEvCast (EvLit evLit) (mkTcTransCo co1 co2)
_ -> panicTcS (text "Unexpected evidence for" <+> ppr (className clas)
$$ vcat (map (ppr . idType) (classMethods clas)))
matchClassInst _ clas [ _k, ty1, ty2 ] loc
| clas == coercibleClass = do
traceTcS "matchClassInst for" $ ppr clas <+> ppr ty1 <+> ppr ty2 <+> text "at depth" <+> ppr (ctLocDepth loc)
ev <- getCoercibleInst loc ty1 ty2
traceTcS "matchClassInst returned" $ ppr ev
return ev
matchClassInst inerts clas tys loc
= do { dflags <- getDynFlags
; untch <- getUntouchables
; traceTcS "matchClassInst" $ vcat [ text "pred =" <+> ppr pred
, text "inerts=" <+> ppr inerts
, text "untouchables=" <+> ppr untch ]
; instEnvs <- getInstEnvs
; case lookupInstEnv instEnvs clas tys of
([], _, _)
-> do { traceTcS "matchClass not matching" $
vcat [ text "dict" <+> ppr pred ]
; return NoInstance }
([(ispec, inst_tys)], [], _)
| not (xopt Opt_IncoherentInstances dflags)
, given_overlap untch
->
do { traceTcS "Delaying instance application" $
vcat [ text "Workitem=" <+> pprType (mkClassPred clas tys)
, text "Relevant given dictionaries=" <+> ppr givens_for_this_clas ]
; return NoInstance }
| otherwise
-> do { let dfun_id = instanceDFunId ispec
; traceTcS "matchClass success" $
vcat [text "dict" <+> ppr pred,
text "witness" <+> ppr dfun_id
<+> ppr (idType dfun_id) ]
; match_one dfun_id inst_tys }
(matches, _, _)
-> do { traceTcS "matchClass multiple matches, deferring choice" $
vcat [text "dict" <+> ppr pred,
text "matches" <+> ppr matches]
; return NoInstance } }
where
pred = mkClassPred clas tys
match_one :: DFunId -> [Maybe TcType] -> TcS LookupInstResult
match_one dfun_id mb_inst_tys
= do { checkWellStagedDFun pred dfun_id loc
; (tys, dfun_phi) <- instDFunType dfun_id mb_inst_tys
; let (theta, _) = tcSplitPhiTy dfun_phi
; if null theta then
return (GenInst [] (EvDFunApp dfun_id tys []))
else do
{ evc_vars <- instDFunConstraints loc theta
; let new_ev_vars = freshGoals evc_vars
dfun_app = EvDFunApp dfun_id tys (getEvTerms evc_vars)
; return $ GenInst new_ev_vars dfun_app } }
givens_for_this_clas :: Cts
givens_for_this_clas
= filterBag isGivenCt (findDictsByClass (inert_dicts $ inert_cans inerts) clas)
given_overlap :: Untouchables -> Bool
given_overlap untch = anyBag (matchable untch) givens_for_this_clas
matchable untch (CDictCan { cc_class = clas_g, cc_tyargs = sys
, cc_ev = fl })
| isGiven fl
= ASSERT( clas_g == clas )
case tcUnifyTys (\tv -> if isTouchableMetaTyVar untch tv &&
tv `elemVarSet` tyVarsOfTypes tys
then BindMe else Skolem) tys sys of
Nothing -> False
Just _ -> True
| otherwise = False
matchable _tys ct = pprPanic "Expecting dictionary!" (ppr ct)
getCoercibleInst :: CtLoc -> TcType -> TcType -> TcS LookupInstResult
getCoercibleInst loc ty1 ty2 = do
rdr_env <- getGlobalRdrEnvTcS
famenv <- getFamInstEnvs
safeMode <- safeLanguageOn `fmap` getDynFlags
go safeMode famenv rdr_env
where
go :: Bool -> FamInstEnvs -> GlobalRdrEnv -> TcS LookupInstResult
go safeMode famenv rdr_env
| ty1 `tcEqType` ty2
= do return $ GenInst []
$ EvCoercion (TcRefl Representational ty1)
| tcIsForAllTy ty1
, tcIsForAllTy ty2
, let (tvs1,body1) = tcSplitForAllTys ty1
(tvs2,body2) = tcSplitForAllTys ty2
, equalLength tvs1 tvs2
= do
ev_term <- deferTcSForAllEq Representational loc (tvs1,body1) (tvs2,body2)
return $ GenInst [] ev_term
| Just (tc1,tyArgs1) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty1,
Just (tc2,tyArgs2) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty2,
tc1 == tc2,
nominalArgsAgree tc1 tyArgs1 tyArgs2,
not safeMode || all (dataConsInScope rdr_env) (tyConsOfTyCon tc1)
= do
when safeMode $ mapM_ (markDataConsAsUsed rdr_env) (tyConsOfTyCon tc1)
arg_stuff <- forM (zip3 (tyConRoles tc1) tyArgs1 tyArgs2) $ \(r,ta1,ta2) ->
case r of Nominal -> do
return
( Nothing
, Nothing
, mkTcNomReflCo ta1
)
Representational -> do
ct_ev <- requestCoercible loc ta1 ta2
local_var <- mkSysLocalM (fsLit "coev") $ mkCoerciblePred ta1 ta2
return
( freshGoal ct_ev
, Just (EvBind local_var (getEvTerm ct_ev))
, mkTcCoVarCo local_var
)
Phantom -> do
return
( Nothing
, Nothing
, TcPhantomCo ta1 ta2)
let (arg_new, arg_binds, arg_cos) = unzip3 arg_stuff
binds = EvBinds (listToBag (catMaybes arg_binds))
tcCo = TcLetCo binds (mkTcTyConAppCo Representational tc1 arg_cos)
return $ GenInst (catMaybes arg_new) (EvCoercion tcCo)
| Just (tc,tyArgs) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty1,
Just (concTy, ntCo) <- instNewTyConTF_maybe famenv tc tyArgs,
dataConsInScope rdr_env tc
= do markDataConsAsUsed rdr_env tc
ct_ev <- requestCoercible loc concTy ty2
local_var <- mkSysLocalM (fsLit "coev") $ mkCoerciblePred concTy ty2
let binds = EvBinds (unitBag (EvBind local_var (getEvTerm ct_ev)))
tcCo = TcLetCo binds $
coercionToTcCoercion ntCo `mkTcTransCo` mkTcCoVarCo local_var
return $ GenInst (freshGoals [ct_ev]) (EvCoercion tcCo)
| Just (tc,tyArgs) <- splitTyConApp_maybe ty2,
Just (concTy, ntCo) <- instNewTyConTF_maybe famenv tc tyArgs,
dataConsInScope rdr_env tc
= do markDataConsAsUsed rdr_env tc
ct_ev <- requestCoercible loc ty1 concTy
local_var <- mkSysLocalM (fsLit "coev") $ mkCoerciblePred ty1 concTy
let binds = EvBinds (unitBag (EvBind local_var (getEvTerm ct_ev)))
tcCo = TcLetCo binds $
mkTcCoVarCo local_var `mkTcTransCo` mkTcSymCo (coercionToTcCoercion ntCo)
return $ GenInst (freshGoals [ct_ev]) (EvCoercion tcCo)
| otherwise
= return NoInstance
nominalArgsAgree :: TyCon -> [Type] -> [Type] -> Bool
nominalArgsAgree tc tys1 tys2 = all ok $ zip3 (tyConRoles tc) tys1 tys2
where ok (r,t1,t2) = r /= Nominal || t1 `tcEqType` t2
dataConsInScope :: GlobalRdrEnv -> TyCon -> Bool
dataConsInScope rdr_env tc = not hidden_data_cons
where
data_con_names = map dataConName (tyConDataCons tc)
hidden_data_cons = not (isWiredInName (tyConName tc)) &&
(isAbstractTyCon tc || any not_in_scope data_con_names)
not_in_scope dc = null (lookupGRE_Name rdr_env dc)
markDataConsAsUsed :: GlobalRdrEnv -> TyCon -> TcS ()
markDataConsAsUsed rdr_env tc = addUsedRdrNamesTcS
[ mkRdrQual (is_as (is_decl imp_spec)) occ
| dc <- tyConDataCons tc
, let dc_name = dataConName dc
occ = nameOccName dc_name
gres = lookupGRE_Name rdr_env dc_name
, not (null gres)
, Imported (imp_spec:_) <- [gre_prov (head gres)] ]
requestCoercible :: CtLoc -> TcType -> TcType -> TcS MaybeNew
requestCoercible loc ty1 ty2 =
ASSERT2( typeKind ty1 `tcEqKind` typeKind ty2, ppr ty1 <+> ppr ty2)
newWantedEvVarNonrec loc' (mkCoerciblePred ty1 ty2)
where loc' = bumpCtLocDepth CountConstraints loc
\end{code}
Note [Coercible Instances]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The class Coercible is special: There are no regular instances, and the user
cannot even define them (it is listed as an `abstractClass` in TcValidity).
Instead, the type checker will create instances and their evidence out of thin
air, in getCoercibleInst. The following “instances” are present:
1. instance Coercible a a
for any type a at any kind k.
2. instance (forall a. Coercible t1 t2) => Coercible (forall a. t1) (forall a. t2)
(which would be illegal to write like that in the source code, but we have
it nevertheless).
3. instance (Coercible t1_r t1'_r, Coercible t2_r t2_r',...) =>
Coercible (C t1_r t2_r ... t1_p t2_p ... t1_n t2_n ...)
(C t1_r' t2_r' ... t1_p' t2_p' ... t1_n t2_n ...)
for a type constructor C where
* the nominal type arguments are not changed,
* the phantom type arguments may change arbitrarily
* the representational type arguments are again Coercible
The type constructor can be used undersaturated; then the Coercible
instance is at a higher kind. This does not cause problems.
Furthermore in Safe Haskell code, we check that
* the data constructors of C are in scope and
* the data constructors of all type constructors used in the definition of
* C are in scope.
This is required as otherwise the previous check can be circumvented by
just adding a local data type around C.
4. instance Coercible r b => Coercible (NT t1 t2 ...) b
instance Coercible a r => Coercible a (NT t1 t2 ...)
for a newtype constructor NT (or data family instance that resolves to a
newtype) where
* r is the concrete type of NT, instantiated with the arguments t1 t2 ...
* the constructor of NT are in scope.
Again, the newtype TyCon can appear undersaturated, but only if it has
enough arguments to apply the newtype coercion (which is eta-reduced). Examples:
newtype NT a = NT (Either a Int)
Coercible (NT Int) (Either Int Int) -- ok
newtype NT2 a b = NT2 (b -> a)
newtype NT3 a b = NT3 (b -> a)
Coercible (NT2 Int) (NT3 Int) -- cannot be derived
The type checker generates evidence in the form of EvCoercion, but the
TcCoercion therein has role Representational, which are turned into Core
coercions by dsEvTerm in DsBinds.
The evidence for the first three instance is generated here by
getCoercibleInst, for the second instance deferTcSForAllEq is used.
When the constraint cannot be solved, it is treated as any other unsolved
constraint, i.e. it can turn up in an inferred type signature, or reported to
the user as a regular "Cannot derive instance ..." error. In the latter case,
coercible_msg in TcErrors gives additional explanations of why GHC could not
find a Coercible instance, so it duplicates some of the logic from
getCoercibleInst (in negated form).
Note [Instance and Given overlap]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Assume that we have an inert set that looks as follows:
[Given] D [Int]
And an instance declaration:
instance C a => D [a]
A new wanted comes along of the form:
[Wanted] D [alpha]
One possibility is to apply the instance declaration which will leave us
with an unsolvable goal (C alpha). However, later on a new constraint may
arise (for instance due to a functional dependency between two later dictionaries),
that will add the equality (alpha ~ Int), in which case our ([Wanted] D [alpha])
will be transformed to [Wanted] D [Int], which could have been discharged by the given.
The solution is that in matchClassInst and eventually in topReact, we get back with
a matching instance, only when there is no Given in the inerts which is unifiable to
this particular dictionary.
The end effect is that, much as we do for overlapping instances, we delay choosing a
class instance if there is a possibility of another instance OR a given to match our
constraint later on. This fixes bugs #4981 and #5002.
This is arguably not easy to appear in practice due to our aggressive prioritization
of equality solving over other constraints, but it is possible. I've added a test case
in typecheck/should-compile/GivenOverlapping.hs
We ignore the overlap problem if -XIncoherentInstances is in force: see
Trac #6002 for a worked-out example where this makes a difference.
Moreover notice that our goals here are different than the goals of the top-level
overlapping checks. There we are interested in validating the following principle:
If we inline a function f at a site where the same global instance environment
is available as the instance environment at the definition site of f then we
should get the same behaviour.
But for the Given Overlap check our goal is just related to completeness of
constraint solving.