{- (c) The University of Glasgow 2006 (c) The GRASP/AQUA Project, Glasgow University, 1992-1998 \section[Demand]{@Demand@: A decoupled implementation of a demand domain} -} {-# LANGUAGE CPP, FlexibleInstances, TypeSynonymInstances, RecordWildCards #-} {-# OPTIONS_GHC -Wno-incomplete-uni-patterns #-} module GHC.Types.Demand ( StrDmd, UseDmd(..), Count, Demand, DmdShell, CleanDemand, getStrDmd, getUseDmd, mkProdDmd, mkOnceUsedDmd, mkManyUsedDmd, mkHeadStrict, oneifyDmd, toCleanDmd, absDmd, topDmd, botDmd, seqDmd, lubDmd, bothDmd, lazyApply1Dmd, lazyApply2Dmd, strictApply1Dmd, isTopDmd, isAbsDmd, isSeqDmd, peelUseCall, cleanUseDmd_maybe, strictenDmd, bothCleanDmd, addCaseBndrDmd, DmdType(..), dmdTypeDepth, lubDmdType, bothDmdType, BothDmdArg, mkBothDmdArg, toBothDmdArg, nopDmdType, botDmdType, addDemand, DmdEnv, emptyDmdEnv, peelFV, findIdDemand, Divergence(..), lubDivergence, isDeadEndDiv, topDiv, botDiv, exnDiv, appIsDeadEnd, isDeadEndSig, pprIfaceStrictSig, StrictSig(..), mkStrictSigForArity, mkClosedStrictSig, nopSig, botSig, isTopSig, hasDemandEnvSig, splitStrictSig, strictSigDmdEnv, prependArgsStrictSig, etaConvertStrictSig, seqDemand, seqDemandList, seqDmdType, seqStrictSig, evalDmd, cleanEvalDmd, cleanEvalProdDmd, isStrictDmd, splitDmdTy, splitFVs, deferAfterPreciseException, postProcessUnsat, postProcessDmdType, splitProdDmd_maybe, peelCallDmd, peelManyCalls, mkCallDmd, mkCallDmds, mkWorkerDemand, dmdTransformSig, dmdTransformDataConSig, dmdTransformDictSelSig, argOneShots, argsOneShots, saturatedByOneShots, TypeShape(..), trimToType, useCount, isUsedOnce, reuseEnv, zapUsageDemand, zapUsageEnvSig, zapUsedOnceDemand, zapUsedOnceSig, strictifyDictDmd, strictifyDmd ) where #include "HsVersions.h" import GHC.Prelude import GHC.Utils.Outputable import GHC.Types.Var ( Var ) import GHC.Types.Var.Env import GHC.Types.Unique.FM import GHC.Utils.Misc import GHC.Types.Basic import GHC.Utils.Binary import GHC.Data.Maybe ( orElse ) import GHC.Core.Type ( Type ) import GHC.Core.TyCon ( isNewTyCon, isClassTyCon ) import GHC.Core.DataCon ( splitDataProductType_maybe ) import GHC.Core.Multiplicity ( scaledThing ) {- ************************************************************************ * * Joint domain for Strictness and Absence * * ************************************************************************ -} data JointDmd s u = JD { sd :: s, ud :: u } deriving ( Eq, Show ) getStrDmd :: JointDmd s u -> s getStrDmd = sd getUseDmd :: JointDmd s u -> u getUseDmd = ud -- Pretty-printing instance (Outputable s, Outputable u) => Outputable (JointDmd s u) where ppr (JD {sd = s, ud = u}) = angleBrackets (ppr s <> char ',' <> ppr u) -- Well-formedness preserving constructors for the joint domain mkJointDmd :: s -> u -> JointDmd s u mkJointDmd s u = JD { sd = s, ud = u } mkJointDmds :: [s] -> [u] -> [JointDmd s u] mkJointDmds ss as = zipWithEqual "mkJointDmds" mkJointDmd ss as {- ************************************************************************ * * Strictness domain * * ************************************************************************ Lazy | HeadStr / \ SCall SProd \ / HyperStr Note [Exceptions and strictness] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We used to smart about catching exceptions, but we aren't anymore. See #14998 for the way it's resolved at the moment. Here's a historic breakdown: Apparently, exception handling prim-ops didn't use to have any special strictness signatures, thus defaulting to nopSig, which assumes they use their arguments lazily. Joachim was the first to realise that we could provide richer information. Thus, in 0558911f91c (Dec 13), he added signatures to primops.txt.pp indicating that functions like `catch#` and `catchRetry#` call their argument, which is useful information for usage analysis. Still with a 'Lazy' strictness demand (i.e. 'lazyApply1Dmd'), though, and the world was fine. In 7c0fff4 (July 15), Simon argued that giving `catch#` et al. a 'strictApply1Dmd' leads to substantial performance gains. That was at the cost of correctness, as #10712 proved. So, back to 'lazyApply1Dmd' in 28638dfe79e (Dec 15). Motivated to reproduce the gains of 7c0fff4 without the breakage of #10712, Ben opened #11222. Simon made the demand analyser "understand catch" in 9915b656 (Jan 16) by adding a new 'catchArgDmd', which basically said to call its argument strictly, but also swallow any thrown exceptions in 'postProcessDivergence'. This was realized by extending the 'Str' constructor of 'ArgStr' with a 'ExnStr' field, indicating that it catches the exception, and adding a 'ThrowsExn' constructor to the 'Divergence' lattice as an element between 'Dunno' and 'Diverges'. Then along came #11555 and finally #13330, so we had to revert to 'lazyApply1Dmd' again in 701256df88c (Mar 17). This left the other variants like 'catchRetry#' having 'catchArgDmd', which is where #14998 picked up. Item 1 was concerned with measuring the impact of also making `catchRetry#` and `catchSTM#` have 'lazyApply1Dmd'. The result was that there was none. We removed the last usages of 'catchArgDmd' in 00b8ecb7 (Apr 18). There was a lot of dead code resulting from that change, that we removed in ef6b283 (Jan 19): We got rid of 'ThrowsExn' and 'ExnStr' again and removed any code that was dealing with the peculiarities. Where did the speed-ups vanish to? In #14998, item 3 established that turning 'catch#' strict in its first argument didn't bring back any of the alleged performance benefits. Item 2 of that ticket finally found out that it was entirely due to 'catchException's new (since #11555) definition, which was simply catchException !io handler = catch io handler While 'catchException' is arguably the saner semantics for 'catch', it is an internal helper function in "GHC.IO". Its use in "GHC.IO.Handle.Internals.do_operation" made for the huge allocation differences: Remove the bang and you find the regressions we originally wanted to avoid with 'catchArgDmd'. See also #exceptions_and_strictness# in "GHC.IO". So history keeps telling us that the only possibly correct strictness annotation for the first argument of 'catch#' is 'lazyApply1Dmd', because 'catch#' really is not strict in its argument: Just try this in GHCi :set -XScopedTypeVariables import Control.Exception catch undefined (\(_ :: SomeException) -> putStrLn "you'll see this") Any analysis that assumes otherwise will be broken in some way or another (beyond `-fno-pendantic-bottoms`). But then #13380 and #17676 suggest (in Mar 20) that we need to re-introduce a subtly different variant of `ThrowsExn` (which we call `ExnOrDiv` now) that is only used by `raiseIO#` in order to preserve precise exceptions by strictness analysis, while not impacting the ability to eliminate dead code. See Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis]. -} -- | Vanilla strictness domain data StrDmd = HyperStr -- ^ Hyper-strict (bottom of the lattice). -- See Note [HyperStr and Use demands] | SCall StrDmd -- ^ Call demand -- Used only for values of function type | SProd [ArgStr] -- ^ Product -- Used only for values of product type -- Invariant: not all components are HyperStr (use HyperStr) -- not all components are Lazy (use HeadStr) | HeadStr -- ^ Head-Strict -- A polymorphic demand: used for values of all types, -- including a type variable deriving ( Eq, Show ) -- | Strictness of a function argument. type ArgStr = Str StrDmd -- | Strictness demand. data Str s = Lazy -- ^ Lazy (top of the lattice) | Str s -- ^ Strict deriving ( Eq, Show ) -- Well-formedness preserving constructors for the Strictness domain strBot, strTop :: ArgStr strBot = Str HyperStr strTop = Lazy mkSCall :: StrDmd -> StrDmd mkSCall HyperStr = HyperStr mkSCall s = SCall s mkSProd :: [ArgStr] -> StrDmd mkSProd sx | any isHyperStr sx = HyperStr | all isLazy sx = HeadStr | otherwise = SProd sx isLazy :: ArgStr -> Bool isLazy Lazy = True isLazy (Str {}) = False isHyperStr :: ArgStr -> Bool isHyperStr (Str HyperStr) = True isHyperStr _ = False -- Pretty-printing instance Outputable StrDmd where ppr HyperStr = char 'B' ppr (SCall s) = char 'C' <> parens (ppr s) ppr HeadStr = char 'S' ppr (SProd sx) = char 'S' <> parens (hcat (map ppr sx)) instance Outputable ArgStr where ppr (Str s) = ppr s ppr Lazy = char 'L' lubArgStr :: ArgStr -> ArgStr -> ArgStr lubArgStr Lazy _ = Lazy lubArgStr _ Lazy = Lazy lubArgStr (Str s1) (Str s2) = Str (s1 `lubStr` s2) lubStr :: StrDmd -> StrDmd -> StrDmd lubStr HyperStr s = s lubStr (SCall s1) HyperStr = SCall s1 lubStr (SCall _) HeadStr = HeadStr lubStr (SCall s1) (SCall s2) = SCall (s1 `lubStr` s2) lubStr (SCall _) (SProd _) = HeadStr lubStr (SProd sx) HyperStr = SProd sx lubStr (SProd _) HeadStr = HeadStr lubStr (SProd s1) (SProd s2) | s1 `equalLength` s2 = mkSProd (zipWith lubArgStr s1 s2) | otherwise = HeadStr lubStr (SProd _) (SCall _) = HeadStr lubStr HeadStr _ = HeadStr bothArgStr :: ArgStr -> ArgStr -> ArgStr bothArgStr Lazy s = s bothArgStr s Lazy = s bothArgStr (Str s1) (Str s2) = Str (s1 `bothStr` s2) bothStr :: StrDmd -> StrDmd -> StrDmd bothStr HyperStr _ = HyperStr bothStr HeadStr s = s bothStr (SCall _) HyperStr = HyperStr bothStr (SCall s1) HeadStr = SCall s1 bothStr (SCall s1) (SCall s2) = SCall (s1 `bothStr` s2) bothStr (SCall _) (SProd _) = HyperStr -- Weird bothStr (SProd _) HyperStr = HyperStr bothStr (SProd s1) HeadStr = SProd s1 bothStr (SProd s1) (SProd s2) | s1 `equalLength` s2 = mkSProd (zipWith bothArgStr s1 s2) | otherwise = HyperStr -- Weird bothStr (SProd _) (SCall _) = HyperStr -- utility functions to deal with memory leaks seqStrDmd :: StrDmd -> () seqStrDmd (SProd ds) = seqStrDmdList ds seqStrDmd (SCall s) = seqStrDmd s seqStrDmd _ = () seqStrDmdList :: [ArgStr] -> () seqStrDmdList [] = () seqStrDmdList (d:ds) = seqArgStr d `seq` seqStrDmdList ds seqArgStr :: ArgStr -> () seqArgStr Lazy = () seqArgStr (Str s) = seqStrDmd s -- Splitting polymorphic demands splitArgStrProdDmd :: Int -> ArgStr -> Maybe [ArgStr] splitArgStrProdDmd n Lazy = Just (replicate n Lazy) splitArgStrProdDmd n (Str s) = splitStrProdDmd n s splitStrProdDmd :: Int -> StrDmd -> Maybe [ArgStr] splitStrProdDmd n HyperStr = Just (replicate n strBot) splitStrProdDmd n HeadStr = Just (replicate n strTop) splitStrProdDmd n (SProd ds) = WARN( not (ds `lengthIs` n), text "splitStrProdDmd" $$ ppr n $$ ppr ds ) Just ds splitStrProdDmd _ (SCall {}) = Nothing -- This can happen when the programmer uses unsafeCoerce, -- and we don't then want to crash the compiler (#9208) {- ************************************************************************ * * Absence domain * * ************************************************************************ Used / \ UCall UProd \ / UHead | Count x - | Abs -} -- | Domain for genuine usage data UseDmd = UCall Count UseDmd -- ^ Call demand for absence. -- Used only for values of function type | UProd [ArgUse] -- ^ Product. -- Used only for values of product type -- See Note [Don't optimise UProd(Used) to Used] -- -- Invariant: Not all components are Abs -- (in that case, use UHead) | UHead -- ^ May be used but its sub-components are -- definitely *not* used. For product types, UHead -- is equivalent to U(AAA); see mkUProd. -- -- UHead is needed only to express the demand -- of 'seq' and 'case' which are polymorphic; -- i.e. the scrutinised value is of type 'a' -- rather than a product type. That's why we -- can't use UProd [A,A,A] -- -- Since (UCall _ Abs) is ill-typed, UHead doesn't -- make sense for lambdas | Used -- ^ May be used and its sub-components may be used. -- (top of the lattice) deriving ( Eq, Show ) -- Extended usage demand for absence and counting type ArgUse = Use UseDmd data Use u = Abs -- Definitely unused -- Bottom of the lattice | Use Count u -- May be used with some cardinality deriving ( Eq, Show ) -- | Abstract counting of usages data Count = One | Many deriving ( Eq, Show ) -- Pretty-printing instance Outputable ArgUse where ppr Abs = char 'A' ppr (Use Many a) = ppr a ppr (Use One a) = char '1' <> char '*' <> ppr a instance Outputable UseDmd where ppr Used = char 'U' ppr (UCall c a) = char 'C' <> ppr c <> parens (ppr a) ppr UHead = char 'H' ppr (UProd as) = char 'U' <> parens (hcat (punctuate (char ',') (map ppr as))) instance Outputable Count where ppr One = char '1' ppr Many = text "" useBot, useTop :: ArgUse useBot = Abs useTop = Use Many Used mkUCall :: Count -> UseDmd -> UseDmd --mkUCall c Used = Used c mkUCall c a = UCall c a mkUProd :: [ArgUse] -> UseDmd mkUProd ux | all (== Abs) ux = UHead | otherwise = UProd ux lubCount :: Count -> Count -> Count lubCount _ Many = Many lubCount Many _ = Many lubCount x _ = x lubArgUse :: ArgUse -> ArgUse -> ArgUse lubArgUse Abs x = x lubArgUse x Abs = x lubArgUse (Use c1 a1) (Use c2 a2) = Use (lubCount c1 c2) (lubUse a1 a2) lubUse :: UseDmd -> UseDmd -> UseDmd lubUse UHead u = u lubUse (UCall c u) UHead = UCall c u lubUse (UCall c1 u1) (UCall c2 u2) = UCall (lubCount c1 c2) (lubUse u1 u2) lubUse (UCall _ _) _ = Used lubUse (UProd ux) UHead = UProd ux lubUse (UProd ux1) (UProd ux2) | ux1 `equalLength` ux2 = UProd $ zipWith lubArgUse ux1 ux2 | otherwise = Used lubUse (UProd {}) (UCall {}) = Used -- lubUse (UProd {}) Used = Used lubUse (UProd ux) Used = UProd (map (`lubArgUse` useTop) ux) lubUse Used (UProd ux) = UProd (map (`lubArgUse` useTop) ux) lubUse Used _ = Used -- Note [Used should win] -- `both` is different from `lub` in its treatment of counting; if -- `both` is computed for two used, the result always has -- cardinality `Many` (except for the inner demands of UCall demand -- [TODO] explain). -- Also, x `bothUse` x /= x (for anything but Abs). bothArgUse :: ArgUse -> ArgUse -> ArgUse bothArgUse Abs x = x bothArgUse x Abs = x bothArgUse (Use _ a1) (Use _ a2) = Use Many (bothUse a1 a2) bothUse :: UseDmd -> UseDmd -> UseDmd bothUse UHead u = u bothUse (UCall c u) UHead = UCall c u -- Exciting special treatment of inner demand for call demands: -- use `lubUse` instead of `bothUse`! bothUse (UCall _ u1) (UCall _ u2) = UCall Many (u1 `lubUse` u2) bothUse (UCall {}) _ = Used bothUse (UProd ux) UHead = UProd ux bothUse (UProd ux1) (UProd ux2) | ux1 `equalLength` ux2 = UProd $ zipWith bothArgUse ux1 ux2 | otherwise = Used bothUse (UProd {}) (UCall {}) = Used -- bothUse (UProd {}) Used = Used -- Note [Used should win] bothUse Used (UProd ux) = UProd (map (`bothArgUse` useTop) ux) bothUse (UProd ux) Used = UProd (map (`bothArgUse` useTop) ux) bothUse Used _ = Used -- Note [Used should win] peelUseCall :: UseDmd -> Maybe (Count, UseDmd) peelUseCall (UCall c u) = Just (c,u) peelUseCall _ = Nothing addCaseBndrDmd :: Demand -- On the case binder -> [Demand] -- On the components of the constructor -> [Demand] -- Final demands for the components of the constructor -- See Note [Demand on case-alternative binders] addCaseBndrDmd (JD { sd = ms, ud = mu }) alt_dmds = case mu of Abs -> alt_dmds Use _ u -> zipWith bothDmd alt_dmds (mkJointDmds ss us) where Just ss = splitArgStrProdDmd arity ms -- Guaranteed not to be a call Just us = splitUseProdDmd arity u -- Ditto where arity = length alt_dmds {- Note [Demand on case-alternative binders] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The demand on a binder in a case alternative comes (a) From the demand on the binder itself (b) From the demand on the case binder Forgetting (b) led directly to #10148. Example. Source code: f x@(p,_) = if p then foo x else True foo (p,True) = True foo (p,q) = foo (q,p) After strictness analysis: f = \ (x_an1 [Dmd=<S(SL),1*U(U,1*U)>] :: (Bool, Bool)) -> case x_an1 of wild_X7 [Dmd=<L,1*U(1*U,1*U)>] { (p_an2 [Dmd=<S,1*U>], ds_dnz [Dmd=<L,A>]) -> case p_an2 of _ { False -> GHC.Types.True; True -> foo wild_X7 } It's true that ds_dnz is *itself* absent, but the use of wild_X7 means that it is very much alive and demanded. See #10148 for how the consequences play out. This is needed even for non-product types, in case the case-binder is used but the components of the case alternative are not. Note [Don't optimise UProd(Used) to Used] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ These two UseDmds: UProd [Used, Used] and Used are semantically equivalent, but we do not turn the former into the latter, for a regrettable-subtle reason. Suppose we did. then f (x,y) = (y,x) would get StrDmd = Str = SProd [Lazy, Lazy] UseDmd = Used = UProd [Used, Used] But with the joint demand of <Str, Used> doesn't convey any clue that there is a product involved, and so the worthSplittingFun will not fire. (We'd need to use the type as well to make it fire.) Moreover, consider g h p@(_,_) = h p This too would get <Str, Used>, but this time there really isn't any point in w/w since the components of the pair are not used at all. So the solution is: don't aggressively collapse UProd [Used,Used] to Used; instead leave it as-is. In effect we are using the UseDmd to do a little bit of boxity analysis. Not very nice. Note [Used should win] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Both in lubUse and bothUse we want (Used `both` UProd us) to be Used. Why? Because Used carries the implication the whole thing is used, box and all, so we don't want to w/w it. If we use it both boxed and unboxed, then we are definitely using the box, and so we are quite likely to pay a reboxing cost. So we make Used win here. Example is in the Buffer argument of GHC.IO.Handle.Internals.writeCharBuffer Baseline: (A) Not making Used win (UProd wins) Compare with: (B) making Used win for lub and both Min -0.3% -5.6% -10.7% -11.0% -33.3% Max +0.3% +45.6% +11.5% +11.5% +6.9% Geometric Mean -0.0% +0.5% +0.3% +0.2% -0.8% Baseline: (B) Making Used win for both lub and both Compare with: (C) making Used win for both, but UProd win for lub Min -0.1% -0.3% -7.9% -8.0% -6.5% Max +0.1% +1.0% +21.0% +21.0% +0.5% Geometric Mean +0.0% +0.0% -0.0% -0.1% -0.1% -} -- If a demand is used multiple times (i.e. reused), than any use-once -- mentioned there, that is not protected by a UCall, can happen many times. markReusedDmd :: ArgUse -> ArgUse markReusedDmd Abs = Abs markReusedDmd (Use _ a) = Use Many (markReused a) markReused :: UseDmd -> UseDmd markReused (UCall _ u) = UCall Many u -- No need to recurse here markReused (UProd ux) = UProd (map markReusedDmd ux) markReused u = u isUsedMU :: ArgUse -> Bool -- True <=> markReusedDmd d = d isUsedMU Abs = True isUsedMU (Use One _) = False isUsedMU (Use Many u) = isUsedU u isUsedU :: UseDmd -> Bool -- True <=> markReused d = d isUsedU Used = True isUsedU UHead = True isUsedU (UProd us) = all isUsedMU us isUsedU (UCall One _) = False isUsedU (UCall Many _) = True -- No need to recurse -- Squashing usage demand demands seqUseDmd :: UseDmd -> () seqUseDmd (UProd ds) = seqArgUseList ds seqUseDmd (UCall c d) = c `seq` seqUseDmd d seqUseDmd _ = () seqArgUseList :: [ArgUse] -> () seqArgUseList [] = () seqArgUseList (d:ds) = seqArgUse d `seq` seqArgUseList ds seqArgUse :: ArgUse -> () seqArgUse (Use c u) = c `seq` seqUseDmd u seqArgUse _ = () -- Splitting polymorphic Maybe-Used demands splitUseProdDmd :: Int -> UseDmd -> Maybe [ArgUse] splitUseProdDmd n Used = Just (replicate n useTop) splitUseProdDmd n UHead = Just (replicate n Abs) splitUseProdDmd n (UProd ds) = WARN( not (ds `lengthIs` n), text "splitUseProdDmd" $$ ppr n $$ ppr ds ) Just ds splitUseProdDmd _ (UCall _ _) = Nothing -- This can happen when the programmer uses unsafeCoerce, -- and we don't then want to crash the compiler (#9208) useCount :: Use u -> Count useCount Abs = One useCount (Use One _) = One useCount _ = Many {- ************************************************************************ * * Clean demand for Strictness and Usage * * ************************************************************************ This domain differst from JointDemand in the sense that pure absence is taken away, i.e., we deal *only* with non-absent demands. Note [Strict demands] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ isStrictDmd returns true only of demands that are both strict and used In particular, it is False for <HyperStr, Abs>, which can and does arise in, say (#7319) f x = raise# <some exception> Then 'x' is not used, so f gets strictness <HyperStr,Abs> -> . Now the w/w generates fx = let x <HyperStr,Abs> = absentError "unused" in raise <some exception> At this point we really don't want to convert to fx = case absentError "unused" of x -> raise <some exception> Since the program is going to diverge, this swaps one error for another, but it's really a bad idea to *ever* evaluate an absent argument. In #7319 we get T7319.exe: Oops! Entered absent arg w_s1Hd{v} [lid] [base:GHC.Base.String{tc 36u}] Note [Dealing with call demands] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Call demands are constructed and deconstructed coherently for strictness and absence. For instance, the strictness signature for the following function f :: (Int -> (Int, Int)) -> (Int, Bool) f g = (snd (g 3), True) should be: <L,C(U(AU))>m -} type CleanDemand = JointDmd StrDmd UseDmd -- A demand that is at least head-strict bothCleanDmd :: CleanDemand -> CleanDemand -> CleanDemand bothCleanDmd (JD { sd = s1, ud = a1}) (JD { sd = s2, ud = a2}) = JD { sd = s1 `bothStr` s2, ud = a1 `bothUse` a2 } mkHeadStrict :: CleanDemand -> CleanDemand mkHeadStrict cd = cd { sd = HeadStr } mkOnceUsedDmd, mkManyUsedDmd :: CleanDemand -> Demand mkOnceUsedDmd (JD {sd = s,ud = a}) = JD { sd = Str s, ud = Use One a } mkManyUsedDmd (JD {sd = s,ud = a}) = JD { sd = Str s, ud = Use Many a } evalDmd :: Demand -- Evaluated strictly, and used arbitrarily deeply evalDmd = JD { sd = Str HeadStr, ud = useTop } mkProdDmd :: [Demand] -> CleanDemand mkProdDmd dx = JD { sd = mkSProd $ map getStrDmd dx , ud = mkUProd $ map getUseDmd dx } -- | Wraps the 'CleanDemand' with a one-shot call demand: @d@ -> @C1(d)@. mkCallDmd :: CleanDemand -> CleanDemand mkCallDmd (JD {sd = d, ud = u}) = JD { sd = mkSCall d, ud = mkUCall One u } -- | @mkCallDmds n d@ returns @C1(C1...(C1 d))@ where there are @n@ @C1@'s. mkCallDmds :: Arity -> CleanDemand -> CleanDemand mkCallDmds arity cd = iterate mkCallDmd cd !! arity -- See Note [Demand on the worker] in GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap mkWorkerDemand :: Int -> Demand mkWorkerDemand n = JD { sd = Lazy, ud = Use One (go n) } where go 0 = Used go n = mkUCall One $ go (n-1) cleanEvalDmd :: CleanDemand cleanEvalDmd = JD { sd = HeadStr, ud = Used } cleanEvalProdDmd :: Arity -> CleanDemand cleanEvalProdDmd n = JD { sd = HeadStr, ud = UProd (replicate n useTop) } {- ************************************************************************ * * Demand: Combining Strictness and Usage * * ************************************************************************ -} type Demand = JointDmd ArgStr ArgUse lubDmd :: Demand -> Demand -> Demand lubDmd (JD {sd = s1, ud = a1}) (JD {sd = s2, ud = a2}) = JD { sd = s1 `lubArgStr` s2 , ud = a1 `lubArgUse` a2 } bothDmd :: Demand -> Demand -> Demand bothDmd (JD {sd = s1, ud = a1}) (JD {sd = s2, ud = a2}) = JD { sd = s1 `bothArgStr` s2 , ud = a1 `bothArgUse` a2 } lazyApply1Dmd, lazyApply2Dmd, strictApply1Dmd :: Demand strictApply1Dmd = JD { sd = Str (SCall HeadStr) , ud = Use Many (UCall One Used) } lazyApply1Dmd = JD { sd = Lazy , ud = Use One (UCall One Used) } -- Second argument of catch#: -- uses its arg at most once, applies it once -- but is lazy (might not be called at all) lazyApply2Dmd = JD { sd = Lazy , ud = Use One (UCall One (UCall One Used)) } absDmd :: Demand absDmd = JD { sd = Lazy, ud = Abs } topDmd :: Demand topDmd = JD { sd = Lazy, ud = useTop } botDmd :: Demand botDmd = JD { sd = strBot, ud = useBot } seqDmd :: Demand seqDmd = JD { sd = Str HeadStr, ud = Use One UHead } oneifyDmd :: JointDmd s (Use u) -> JointDmd s (Use u) oneifyDmd (JD { sd = s, ud = Use _ a }) = JD { sd = s, ud = Use One a } oneifyDmd jd = jd isTopDmd :: Demand -> Bool -- Used to suppress pretty-printing of an uninformative demand isTopDmd (JD {sd = Lazy, ud = Use Many Used}) = True isTopDmd _ = False isAbsDmd :: JointDmd (Str s) (Use u) -> Bool isAbsDmd (JD {ud = Abs}) = True -- The strictness part can be HyperStr isAbsDmd _ = False -- for a bottom demand isSeqDmd :: Demand -> Bool isSeqDmd (JD {sd = Str HeadStr, ud = Use _ UHead}) = True isSeqDmd _ = False isUsedOnce :: JointDmd (Str s) (Use u) -> Bool isUsedOnce (JD { ud = a }) = case useCount a of One -> True Many -> False -- More utility functions for strictness seqDemand :: Demand -> () seqDemand (JD {sd = s, ud = u}) = seqArgStr s `seq` seqArgUse u seqDemandList :: [Demand] -> () seqDemandList [] = () seqDemandList (d:ds) = seqDemand d `seq` seqDemandList ds isStrictDmd :: JointDmd (Str s) (Use u) -> Bool -- See Note [Strict demands] isStrictDmd (JD {ud = Abs}) = False isStrictDmd (JD {sd = Lazy}) = False isStrictDmd _ = True isWeakDmd :: Demand -> Bool isWeakDmd (JD {sd = s, ud = a}) = isLazy s && isUsedMU a cleanUseDmd_maybe :: Demand -> Maybe UseDmd cleanUseDmd_maybe (JD { ud = Use _ u }) = Just u cleanUseDmd_maybe _ = Nothing splitFVs :: Bool -- Thunk -> DmdEnv -> (DmdEnv, DmdEnv) splitFVs is_thunk rhs_fvs | is_thunk = strictPairToTuple $ nonDetStrictFoldUFM_Directly add (emptyVarEnv :*: emptyVarEnv) rhs_fvs -- It's OK to use a non-deterministic fold because we -- immediately forget the ordering by putting the elements -- in the envs again | otherwise = partitionVarEnv isWeakDmd rhs_fvs where add uniq dmd@(JD { sd = s, ud = u }) (lazy_fv :*: sig_fv) | Lazy <- s = addToUFM_Directly lazy_fv uniq dmd :*: sig_fv | otherwise = addToUFM_Directly lazy_fv uniq (JD { sd = Lazy, ud = u }) :*: addToUFM_Directly sig_fv uniq (JD { sd = s, ud = Abs }) data StrictPair a b = !a :*: !b strictPairToTuple :: StrictPair a b -> (a, b) strictPairToTuple (x :*: y) = (x, y) splitProdDmd_maybe :: Demand -> Maybe [Demand] -- Split a product into its components, iff there is any -- useful information to be extracted thereby -- The demand is not necessarily strict! splitProdDmd_maybe (JD { sd = s, ud = u }) = case (s,u) of (Str (SProd sx), Use _ u) | Just ux <- splitUseProdDmd (length sx) u -> Just (mkJointDmds sx ux) (Str s, Use _ (UProd ux)) | Just sx <- splitStrProdDmd (length ux) s -> Just (mkJointDmds sx ux) (Lazy, Use _ (UProd ux)) -> Just (mkJointDmds (replicate (length ux) Lazy) ux) _ -> Nothing {- ********************************************************************* * * TypeShape and demand trimming * * ********************************************************************* -} data TypeShape -- See Note [Trimming a demand to a type] -- in GHC.Core.Opt.DmdAnal = TsFun TypeShape | TsProd [TypeShape] | TsUnk trimToType :: Demand -> TypeShape -> Demand -- See Note [Trimming a demand to a type] in GHC.Core.Opt.DmdAnal trimToType (JD { sd = ms, ud = mu }) ts = JD (go_ms ms ts) (go_mu mu ts) where go_ms :: ArgStr -> TypeShape -> ArgStr go_ms Lazy _ = Lazy go_ms (Str s) ts = Str (go_s s ts) go_s :: StrDmd -> TypeShape -> StrDmd go_s HyperStr _ = HyperStr go_s (SCall s) (TsFun ts) = SCall (go_s s ts) go_s (SProd mss) (TsProd tss) | equalLength mss tss = SProd (zipWith go_ms mss tss) go_s _ _ = HeadStr go_mu :: ArgUse -> TypeShape -> ArgUse go_mu Abs _ = Abs go_mu (Use c u) ts = Use c (go_u u ts) go_u :: UseDmd -> TypeShape -> UseDmd go_u UHead _ = UHead go_u (UCall c u) (TsFun ts) = UCall c (go_u u ts) go_u (UProd mus) (TsProd tss) | equalLength mus tss = UProd (zipWith go_mu mus tss) go_u _ _ = Used instance Outputable TypeShape where ppr TsUnk = text "TsUnk" ppr (TsFun ts) = text "TsFun" <> parens (ppr ts) ppr (TsProd tss) = parens (hsep $ punctuate comma $ map ppr tss) {- ********************************************************************* * * Termination * * ********************************************************************* -} -- | Divergence lattice. Models a subset lattice of the following exhaustive -- set of divergence results: -- -- [n] nontermination (e.g. loops) -- [i] throws imprecise exception -- [p] throws precise exception -- [c] converges (reduces to WHNF) -- -- The different lattice elements correspond to different subsets, indicated by -- juxtaposition of indicators (e.g. __nc__ definitely doesn't throw an -- exception, and may or may not reduce to WHNF). -- -- @ -- Dunno (nipc) -- | -- ExnOrDiv (nip) -- | -- Diverges (ni) -- @ -- -- As you can see, we don't distinguish __n__ and __i__. -- See Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis] for why __p__ is so -- special compared to __i__. data Divergence = Diverges -- ^ Definitely throws an imprecise exception or diverges. | ExnOrDiv -- ^ Definitely throws a *precise* exception, an imprecise -- exception or diverges. Never converges, hence 'isDeadEndDiv'! -- See scenario 1 in Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis]. | Dunno -- ^ Might diverge, throw any kind of exception or converge. deriving( Eq, Show ) lubDivergence :: Divergence -> Divergence -> Divergence lubDivergence Diverges div = div lubDivergence div Diverges = div lubDivergence ExnOrDiv ExnOrDiv = ExnOrDiv lubDivergence _ _ = Dunno -- This needs to commute with defaultFvDmd, i.e. -- defaultFvDmd (r1 `lubDivergence` r2) = defaultFvDmd r1 `lubDmd` defaultFvDmd r2 -- (See Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments] for why) bothDivergence :: Divergence -> Divergence -> Divergence -- See Note [Asymmetry of 'both*'], which concludes that 'bothDivergence' needs -- to be symmetric. -- Strictly speaking, we should have @bothDivergence Dunno Diverges = ExnOrDiv@. -- But that regresses in too many places (every infinite loop, basically) to be -- worth it and is only relevant in higher-order scenarios -- (e.g. Divergence of @f (throwIO blah)@). -- So 'bothDivergence' currently is 'glbDivergence', really. bothDivergence Dunno Dunno = Dunno bothDivergence Diverges _ = Diverges bothDivergence _ Diverges = Diverges bothDivergence _ _ = ExnOrDiv instance Outputable Divergence where ppr Diverges = char 'b' -- for (b)ottom ppr ExnOrDiv = char 'x' -- for e(x)ception ppr Dunno = empty {- Note [Precise vs imprecise exceptions] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ An exception is considered to be /precise/ when it is thrown by the 'raiseIO#' primop. It follows that all other primops (such as 'raise#' or division-by-zero) throw /imprecise/ exceptions. Note that the actual type of the exception thrown doesn't have any impact! GHC undertakes some effort not to apply an optimisation that would mask a /precise/ exception with some other source of nontermination, such as genuine divergence or an imprecise exception, so that the user can reliably intercept the precise exception with a catch handler before and after optimisations. See also the wiki page on precise exceptions: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/exceptions/precise-exceptions Section 5 of "Tackling the awkward squad" talks about semantic concerns. Imprecise exceptions are actually more interesting than precise ones (which are fairly standard) from the perspective of semantics. See the paper "A Semantics for Imprecise Exceptions" for more details. Note [Dead ends] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We call an expression that either diverges or throws a precise or imprecise exception a "dead end". We used to call such an expression just "bottoming", but with the measures we take to preserve precise exception semantics (see Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis]), that is no longer accurate: 'exnDiv' is no longer the bottom of the Divergence lattice. Yet externally to demand analysis, we mostly care about being able to drop dead code etc., which is all due to the property that such an expression never returns, hence we consider throwing a precise exception to be a dead end. See also 'isDeadEndDiv'. Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ We have to take care to preserve precise exception semantics in strictness analysis (#17676). There are two scenarios that need careful treatment. The fixes were discussed at https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/wikis/fixing-precise-exceptions Recall that raiseIO# raises a *precise* exception, in contrast to raise# which raises an *imprecise* exception. See Note [Precise vs imprecise exceptions]. Scenario 1: Precise exceptions in case alternatives --------------------------------------------------- Unlike raise# (which returns botDiv), we want raiseIO# to return exnDiv. Here's why. Consider this example from #13380 (similarly #17676): f x y | x>0 = raiseIO# Exc | y>0 = return 1 | otherwise = return 2 Is 'f' strict in 'y'? One might be tempted to say yes! But that plays fast and loose with the precise exception; after optimisation, (f 42 (error "boom")) turns from throwing the precise Exc to throwing the imprecise user error "boom". So, the defaultFvDmd of raiseIO# should be lazy (topDmd), which can be achieved by giving it divergence exnDiv. See Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments]. Why don't we just give it topDiv instead of introducing exnDiv? Because then the simplifier will fail to discard raiseIO#'s continuation in case raiseIO# x s of { (# s', r #) -> <BIG> } which we'd like to optimise to case raiseIO# x s of {} Hence we came up with exnDiv. The default FV demand of exnDiv is lazy (and its default arg dmd is absent), but otherwise (in terms of 'isDeadEndDiv') it behaves exactly as botDiv, so that dead code elimination works as expected. This is tracked by T13380b. Scenario 2: Precise exceptions in case scrutinees ------------------------------------------------- Consider (more complete examples in #148, #1592, testcase strun003) case foo x s of { (# s', r #) -> y } Is this strict in 'y'? Often not! If @foo x s@ might throw a precise exception (ultimately via raiseIO#), then we must not force 'y', which may fail to terminate or throw an imprecise exception, until we have performed @foo x s@. So we have to 'deferAfterPreciseException' (which 'lub's with 'exnDmdType' to model the exceptional control flow) when @foo x s@ may throw a precise exception. Motivated by T13380{d,e,f}. See Note [Which scrutinees may throw precise exceptions] in "GHC.Core.Opt.DmdAnal". We have to be careful not to discard dead-end Divergence from case alternatives, though (#18086): m = putStrLn "foo" >> error "bar" 'm' should still have 'exnDiv', which is why it is not sufficient to lub with 'nopDmdType' (which has 'topDiv') in 'deferAfterPreciseException'. Historical Note: This used to be called the "IO hack". But that term is rather a bad fit because 1. It's easily confused with the "State hack", which also affects IO. 2. Neither "IO" nor "hack" is a good description of what goes on here, which is deferring strictness results after possibly throwing a precise exception. The "hack" is probably not having to defer when we can prove that the expression may not throw a precise exception (increasing precision of the analysis), but that's just a favourable guess. -} ------------------------------------------------------------------------ -- Combined demand result -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ topDiv, exnDiv, botDiv :: Divergence topDiv = Dunno exnDiv = ExnOrDiv botDiv = Diverges -- | True if the result indicates that evaluation will not return. -- See Note [Dead ends]. isDeadEndDiv :: Divergence -> Bool isDeadEndDiv Diverges = True isDeadEndDiv ExnOrDiv = True isDeadEndDiv Dunno = False -- See Notes [Default demand on free variables and arguments] -- and Scenario 1 in [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis] defaultFvDmd :: Divergence -> Demand defaultFvDmd Dunno = absDmd defaultFvDmd ExnOrDiv = absDmd -- This is the whole point of ExnOrDiv! defaultFvDmd Diverges = botDmd -- Diverges defaultArgDmd :: Divergence -> Demand -- TopRes and BotRes are polymorphic, so that -- BotRes === (Bot -> BotRes) === ... -- TopRes === (Top -> TopRes) === ... -- This function makes that concrete -- Also see Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments] defaultArgDmd Dunno = topDmd -- NB: not botDmd! We don't want to mask the precise exception by forcing the -- argument. But it is still absent. defaultArgDmd ExnOrDiv = absDmd defaultArgDmd Diverges = botDmd {- Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Free variables not mentioned in the environment of a 'DmdType' are demanded according to the demand type's Divergence: * In a Diverges (botDiv) context, that demand is botDmd (HyperStr and Absent). * In all other contexts, the demand is absDmd (Lazy and Absent). This is recorded in 'defaultFvDmd'. Similarly, we can eta-expand demand types to get demands on excess arguments not accounted for in the type, by consulting 'defaultArgDmd': * In a Diverges (botDiv) context, that demand is again botDmd. * In a ExnOrDiv (exnDiv) context, that demand is absDmd: We surely diverge before evaluating the excess argument, but don't want to eagerly evaluate it (cf. Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis]). * In a Dunno context (topDiv), the demand is topDmd, because it's perfectly possible to enter the additional lambda and evaluate it in unforeseen ways (so, not Absent). ************************************************************************ * * Demand environments and types * * ************************************************************************ -} type DmdEnv = VarEnv Demand -- See Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments] data DmdType = DmdType DmdEnv -- Demand on explicitly-mentioned -- free variables [Demand] -- Demand on arguments Divergence -- See [Demand type Divergence] {- Note [Demand type Divergence] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In contrast to StrictSigs, DmdTypes are elicited under a specific incoming demand. This is described in detail in Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig]. Here, we'll focus on what that means for a DmdType's Divergence in a higher-order scenario. Consider err x y = x `seq` y `seq` error (show x) this has a strictness signature of <S><S>b meaning that we don't know what happens when we call errin weaker contexts than C(C(S)), like @err `seq` ()@ (S) and @err 1 `seq` ()@ (C(S)). We may not unleash the botDiv, hence assume topDiv. Of course, in @err 1 2 `seq` ()@ the incoming demand C(C(S)) is strong enough and we see that the expression diverges. Now consider a function f g = g 1 2 with signature <C(S)>, and the expression f err `seq` () now f puts a strictness demand of C(C(S)) onto its argument, which is unleashed on err via the App rule. In contrast to weaker head strictness, this demand is strong enough to unleash err's signature and hence we see that the whole expression diverges! Note [Asymmetry of 'both*'] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 'both' for DmdTypes is *asymmetrical*, because there can only one be one type contributing argument demands! For example, given (e1 e2), we get a DmdType dt1 for e1, use its arg demand to analyse e2 giving dt2, and then do (dt1 `bothType` dt2). Similarly with case e of { p -> rhs } we get dt_scrut from the scrutinee and dt_rhs from the RHS, and then compute (dt_rhs `bothType` dt_scrut). We 1. combine the information on the free variables, 2. take the demand on arguments from the first argument 3. combine the termination results, as in bothDivergence. Since we don't use argument demands of the second argument anyway, 'both's second argument is just a 'BothDmdType'. But note that the argument demand types are not guaranteed to be observed in left to right order. For example, analysis of a case expression will pass the demand type for the alts as the left argument and the type for the scrutinee as the right argument. Also, it is not at all clear if there is such an order; consider the LetUp case, where the RHS might be forced at any point while evaluating the let body. Therefore, it is crucial that 'bothDivergence' is symmetric! -} -- Equality needed for fixpoints in GHC.Core.Opt.DmdAnal instance Eq DmdType where (==) (DmdType fv1 ds1 div1) (DmdType fv2 ds2 div2) = nonDetUFMToList fv1 == nonDetUFMToList fv2 -- It's OK to use nonDetUFMToList here because we're testing for -- equality and even though the lists will be in some arbitrary -- Unique order, it is the same order for both && ds1 == ds2 && div1 == div2 -- | Compute the least upper bound of two 'DmdType's elicited /by the same -- incoming demand/! lubDmdType :: DmdType -> DmdType -> DmdType lubDmdType d1 d2 = DmdType lub_fv lub_ds lub_div where n = max (dmdTypeDepth d1) (dmdTypeDepth d2) (DmdType fv1 ds1 r1) = etaExpandDmdType n d1 (DmdType fv2 ds2 r2) = etaExpandDmdType n d2 lub_fv = plusVarEnv_CD lubDmd fv1 (defaultFvDmd r1) fv2 (defaultFvDmd r2) lub_ds = zipWithEqual "lubDmdType" lubDmd ds1 ds2 lub_div = lubDivergence r1 r2 type BothDmdArg = (DmdEnv, Divergence) mkBothDmdArg :: DmdEnv -> BothDmdArg mkBothDmdArg env = (env, topDiv) toBothDmdArg :: DmdType -> BothDmdArg toBothDmdArg (DmdType fv _ r) = (fv, r) bothDmdType :: DmdType -> BothDmdArg -> DmdType bothDmdType (DmdType fv1 ds1 r1) (fv2, t2) -- See Note [Asymmetry of 'both*'] -- 'both' takes the argument/result info from its *first* arg, -- using its second arg just for its free-var info. = DmdType (plusVarEnv_CD bothDmd fv1 (defaultFvDmd r1) fv2 (defaultFvDmd t2)) ds1 (r1 `bothDivergence` t2) instance Outputable DmdType where ppr (DmdType fv ds res) = hsep [hcat (map ppr ds) <> ppr res, if null fv_elts then empty else braces (fsep (map pp_elt fv_elts))] where pp_elt (uniq, dmd) = ppr uniq <> text "->" <> ppr dmd fv_elts = nonDetUFMToList fv -- It's OK to use nonDetUFMToList here because we only do it for -- pretty printing emptyDmdEnv :: VarEnv Demand emptyDmdEnv = emptyVarEnv botDmdType :: DmdType botDmdType = DmdType emptyDmdEnv [] botDiv -- | The demand type of doing nothing (lazy, absent, no Divergence -- information). Note that it is ''not'' the top of the lattice (which would be -- "may use everything"), so it is (no longer) called topDmdType. -- (SG: I agree, but why is it still 'topDmd' then?) nopDmdType :: DmdType nopDmdType = DmdType emptyDmdEnv [] topDiv isTopDmdType :: DmdType -> Bool isTopDmdType (DmdType env args div) = div == topDiv && null args && isEmptyVarEnv env -- | The demand type of an unspecified expression that is guaranteed to -- throw a (precise or imprecise) exception or diverge. exnDmdType :: DmdType exnDmdType = DmdType emptyDmdEnv [] exnDiv dmdTypeDepth :: DmdType -> Arity dmdTypeDepth (DmdType _ ds _) = length ds -- | This makes sure we can use the demand type with n arguments after eta -- expansion, where n must not be lower than the demand types depth. -- It appends the argument list with the correct 'defaultArgDmd'. etaExpandDmdType :: Arity -> DmdType -> DmdType etaExpandDmdType n d | n == depth = d | n > depth = DmdType fv inc_ds div | otherwise = pprPanic "etaExpandDmdType: arity decrease" (ppr n $$ ppr d) where depth = dmdTypeDepth d DmdType fv ds div = d -- Arity increase: -- * Demands on FVs are still valid -- * Demands on args also valid, plus we can extend with defaultArgDmd -- as appropriate for the given Divergence -- * Divergence is still valid: -- - A dead end after 2 arguments stays a dead end after 3 arguments -- - The remaining case is Dunno, which is already topDiv inc_ds = take n (ds ++ repeat (defaultArgDmd div)) -- | A conservative approximation for a given 'DmdType' in case of an arity -- decrease. Currently, it's just nopDmdType. decreaseArityDmdType :: DmdType -> DmdType decreaseArityDmdType _ = nopDmdType seqDmdType :: DmdType -> () seqDmdType (DmdType env ds res) = seqDmdEnv env `seq` seqDemandList ds `seq` res `seq` () seqDmdEnv :: DmdEnv -> () seqDmdEnv env = seqEltsUFM seqDemandList env splitDmdTy :: DmdType -> (Demand, DmdType) -- Split off one function argument -- We already have a suitable demand on all -- free vars, so no need to add more! splitDmdTy (DmdType fv (dmd:dmds) res_ty) = (dmd, DmdType fv dmds res_ty) splitDmdTy ty@(DmdType _ [] res_ty) = (defaultArgDmd res_ty, ty) -- | When e is evaluated after executing an IO action that may throw a precise -- exception, we act as if there is an additional control flow path that is -- taken if e throws a precise exception. The demand type of this control flow -- path -- * is lazy and absent ('topDmd') in all free variables and arguments -- * has 'exnDiv' 'Divergence' result -- So we can simply take a variant of 'nopDmdType', 'exnDmdType'. -- Why not 'nopDmdType'? Because then the result of 'e' can never be 'exnDiv'! -- That means failure to drop dead-ends, see #18086. -- See Note [Precise exceptions and strictness analysis] deferAfterPreciseException :: DmdType -> DmdType deferAfterPreciseException = lubDmdType exnDmdType strictenDmd :: Demand -> Demand strictenDmd (JD { sd = s, ud = u}) = JD { sd = poke_s s, ud = poke_u u } where poke_s Lazy = Str HeadStr poke_s s = s poke_u Abs = useTop poke_u u = u -- Deferring and peeling type DmdShell -- Describes the "outer shell" -- of a Demand = JointDmd (Str ()) (Use ()) toCleanDmd :: Demand -> (DmdShell, CleanDemand) -- Splits a Demand into its "shell" and the inner "clean demand" toCleanDmd (JD { sd = s, ud = u }) = (JD { sd = ss, ud = us }, JD { sd = s', ud = u' }) -- See Note [Analyzing with lazy demand and lambdas] -- See Note [Analysing with absent demand] where (ss, s') = case s of Str s' -> (Str (), s') Lazy -> (Lazy, HeadStr) (us, u') = case u of Use c u' -> (Use c (), u') Abs -> (Abs, Used) -- This is used in dmdAnalStar when post-processing -- a function's argument demand. So we only care about what -- does to free variables, and whether it terminates. -- see Note [Asymmetry of 'both*'] postProcessDmdType :: DmdShell -> DmdType -> BothDmdArg postProcessDmdType du@(JD { sd = ss }) (DmdType fv _ res_ty) = (postProcessDmdEnv du fv, postProcessDivergence ss res_ty) postProcessDivergence :: Str () -> Divergence -> Divergence -- In a Lazy scenario, we might not force the Divergence, in which case we -- converge, hence Dunno. postProcessDivergence Lazy _ = Dunno postProcessDivergence _ d = d postProcessDmdEnv :: DmdShell -> DmdEnv -> DmdEnv postProcessDmdEnv ds@(JD { sd = ss, ud = us }) env | Abs <- us = emptyDmdEnv -- In this case (postProcessDmd ds) == id; avoid a redundant rebuild -- of the environment. Be careful, bad things will happen if this doesn't -- match postProcessDmd (see #13977). | Str _ <- ss , Use One _ <- us = env | otherwise = mapVarEnv (postProcessDmd ds) env -- For the Absent case just discard all usage information -- We only processed the thing at all to analyse the body -- See Note [Always analyse in virgin pass] reuseEnv :: DmdEnv -> DmdEnv reuseEnv = mapVarEnv (postProcessDmd (JD { sd = Str (), ud = Use Many () })) postProcessUnsat :: DmdShell -> DmdType -> DmdType postProcessUnsat ds@(JD { sd = ss }) (DmdType fv args res_ty) = DmdType (postProcessDmdEnv ds fv) (map (postProcessDmd ds) args) (postProcessDivergence ss res_ty) postProcessDmd :: DmdShell -> Demand -> Demand postProcessDmd (JD { sd = ss, ud = us }) (JD { sd = s, ud = a}) = JD { sd = s', ud = a' } where s' = case ss of Lazy -> Lazy Str _ -> s a' = case us of Abs -> Abs Use Many _ -> markReusedDmd a Use One _ -> a -- Peels one call level from the demand, and also returns -- whether it was unsaturated (separately for strictness and usage) peelCallDmd :: CleanDemand -> (CleanDemand, DmdShell) -- Exploiting the fact that -- on the strictness side C(B) = B -- and on the usage side C(U) = U peelCallDmd (JD {sd = s, ud = u}) = (JD { sd = s', ud = u' }, JD { sd = ss, ud = us }) where (s', ss) = case s of SCall s' -> (s', Str ()) HyperStr -> (HyperStr, Str ()) _ -> (HeadStr, Lazy) (u', us) = case u of UCall c u' -> (u', Use c ()) _ -> (Used, Use Many ()) -- The _ cases for usage includes UHead which seems a bit wrong -- because the body isn't used at all! -- c.f. the Abs case in toCleanDmd -- Peels that multiple nestings of calls clean demand and also returns -- whether it was unsaturated (separately for strictness and usage -- see Note [Demands from unsaturated function calls] peelManyCalls :: Int -> CleanDemand -> DmdShell peelManyCalls n (JD { sd = str, ud = abs }) = JD { sd = go_str n str, ud = go_abs n abs } where go_str :: Int -> StrDmd -> Str () -- True <=> unsaturated, defer go_str 0 _ = Str () go_str _ HyperStr = Str () -- == go_str (n-1) HyperStr, as HyperStr = Call(HyperStr) go_str n (SCall d') = go_str (n-1) d' go_str _ _ = Lazy go_abs :: Int -> UseDmd -> Use () -- Many <=> unsaturated, or at least go_abs 0 _ = Use One () -- one UCall Many in the demand go_abs n (UCall One d') = go_abs (n-1) d' go_abs _ _ = Use Many () {- Note [Demands from unsaturated function calls] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider a demand transformer d1 -> d2 -> r for f. If a sufficiently detailed demand is fed into this transformer, e.g <C(C(S)), C1(C1(S))> arising from "f x1 x2" in a strict, use-once context, then d1 and d2 is precisely the demand unleashed onto x1 and x2 (similar for the free variable environment) and furthermore the result information r is the one we want to use. An anonymous lambda is also an unsaturated function all (needs one argument, none given), so this applies to that case as well. But the demand fed into f might be less than <C(C(S)), C1(C1(S))>. There are a few cases: * Not enough demand on the strictness side: - In that case, we need to zap all strictness in the demand on arguments and free variables. - And finally Divergence information: If r says that f Diverges for sure, then this holds when the demand guarantees that two arguments are going to be passed. If the demand is lower, we may just as well converge. If we were tracking definite convegence, than that would still hold under a weaker demand than expected by the demand transformer. * Not enough demand from the usage side: The missing usage can be expanded using UCall Many, therefore this is subsumed by the third case: * At least one of the uses has a cardinality of Many. - Even if f puts a One demand on any of its argument or free variables, if we call f multiple times, we may evaluate this argument or free variable multiple times. So forget about any occurrence of "One" in the demand. In dmdTransformSig, we call peelManyCalls to find out if we are in any of these cases, and then call postProcessUnsat to reduce the demand appropriately. Similarly, dmdTransformDictSelSig and dmdAnal, when analyzing a Lambda, use peelCallDmd, which peels only one level, but also returns the demand put on the body of the function. -} peelFV :: DmdType -> Var -> (DmdType, Demand) peelFV (DmdType fv ds res) id = -- pprTrace "rfv" (ppr id <+> ppr dmd $$ ppr fv) (DmdType fv' ds res, dmd) where fv' = fv `delVarEnv` id -- See Note [Default demand on free variables and arguments] dmd = lookupVarEnv fv id `orElse` defaultFvDmd res addDemand :: Demand -> DmdType -> DmdType addDemand dmd (DmdType fv ds res) = DmdType fv (dmd:ds) res findIdDemand :: DmdType -> Var -> Demand findIdDemand (DmdType fv _ res) id = lookupVarEnv fv id `orElse` defaultFvDmd res {- Note [Always analyse in virgin pass] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tricky point: make sure that we analyse in the 'virgin' pass. Consider rec { f acc x True = f (...rec { g y = ...g... }...) f acc x False = acc } In the virgin pass for 'f' we'll give 'f' a very strict (bottom) type. That might mean that we analyse the sub-expression containing the E = "...rec g..." stuff in a bottom demand. Suppose we *didn't analyse* E, but just returned botType. Then in the *next* (non-virgin) iteration for 'f', we might analyse E in a weaker demand, and that will trigger doing a fixpoint iteration for g. But *because it's not the virgin pass* we won't start g's iteration at bottom. Disaster. (This happened in $sfibToList' of nofib/spectral/fibheaps.) So in the virgin pass we make sure that we do analyse the expression at least once, to initialise its signatures. Note [Analyzing with lazy demand and lambdas] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The insight for analyzing lambdas follows from the fact that for strictness S = C(L). This polymorphic expansion is critical for cardinality analysis of the following example: {-# NOINLINE build #-} build g = (g (:) [], g (:) []) h c z = build (\x -> let z1 = z ++ z in if c then \y -> x (y ++ z1) else \y -> x (z1 ++ y)) One can see that `build` assigns to `g` demand <L,C(C1(U))>. Therefore, when analyzing the lambda `(\x -> ...)`, we expect each lambda \y -> ... to be annotated as "one-shot" one. Therefore (\x -> \y -> x (y ++ z)) should be analyzed with a demand <C(C(..), C(C1(U))>. This is achieved by, first, converting the lazy demand L into the strict S by the second clause of the analysis. Note [Analysing with absent demand] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Suppose we analyse an expression with demand <L,A>. The "A" means "absent", so this expression will never be needed. What should happen? There are several wrinkles: * We *do* want to analyse the expression regardless. Reason: Note [Always analyse in virgin pass] But we can post-process the results to ignore all the usage demands coming back. This is done by postProcessDmdType. * In a previous incarnation of GHC we needed to be extra careful in the case of an *unlifted type*, because unlifted values are evaluated even if they are not used. Example (see #9254): f :: (() -> (# Int#, () #)) -> () -- Strictness signature is -- <C(S(LS)), 1*C1(U(A,1*U()))> -- I.e. calls k, but discards first component of result f k = case k () of (# _, r #) -> r g :: Int -> () g y = f (\n -> (# case y of I# y2 -> y2, n #)) Here f's strictness signature says (correctly) that it calls its argument function and ignores the first component of its result. This is correct in the sense that it'd be fine to (say) modify the function so that always returned 0# in the first component. But in function g, we *will* evaluate the 'case y of ...', because it has type Int#. So 'y' will be evaluated. So we must record this usage of 'y', else 'g' will say 'y' is absent, and will w/w so that 'y' is bound to an aBSENT_ERROR thunk. However, the argument of toCleanDmd always satisfies the let/app invariant; so if it is unlifted it is also okForSpeculation, and so can be evaluated in a short finite time -- and that rules out nasty cases like the one above. (I'm not quite sure why this was a problem in an earlier version of GHC, but it isn't now.) ************************************************************************ * * Demand signatures * * ************************************************************************ In a let-bound Id we record its strictness info. In principle, this strictness info is a demand transformer, mapping a demand on the Id into a DmdType, which gives a) the free vars of the Id's value b) the Id's arguments c) an indication of the result of applying the Id to its arguments However, in fact we store in the Id an extremely emascuated demand transfomer, namely a single DmdType (Nevertheless we dignify StrictSig as a distinct type.) This DmdType gives the demands unleashed by the Id when it is applied to as many arguments as are given in by the arg demands in the DmdType. Also see Note [Demand type Divergence] for the meaning of a Divergence in a strictness signature. If an Id is applied to less arguments than its arity, it means that the demand on the function at a call site is weaker than the vanilla call demand, used for signature inference. Therefore we place a top demand on all arguments. Otherwise, the demand is specified by Id's signature. For example, the demand transformer described by the demand signature StrictSig (DmdType {x -> <S,1*U>} <L,A><L,U(U,U)>m) says that when the function is applied to two arguments, it unleashes demand <S,1*U> on the free var x, <L,A> on the first arg, and <L,U(U,U)> on the second, then returning a constructor. If this same function is applied to one arg, all we can say is that it uses x with <L,U>, and its arg with demand <L,U>. Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Demand types are sound approximations of an expression's semantics relative to the incoming demand we put the expression under. Consider the following expression: \x y -> x `seq` (y, 2*x) Here is a table with demand types resulting from different incoming demands we put that expression under. Note the monotonicity; a stronger incoming demand yields a more precise demand type: incoming demand | demand type ---------------------------------------------------- <S ,HU > | <L,U><L,U>{} <C(C(S )),C1(C1(U ))> | <S,U><L,U>{} <C(C(S(S,L))),C1(C1(U(1*U,A)))> | <S,1*HU><L,A>{} Note that in the first example, the depth of the demand type was *higher* than the arity of the incoming call demand due to the anonymous lambda. The converse is also possible and happens when we unleash demand signatures. In @f x y@, the incoming call demand on f has arity 2. But if all we have is a demand signature with depth 1 for @f@ (which we can safely unleash, see below), the demand type of @f@ under a call demand of arity 2 has a *lower* depth of 1. So: Demand types are elicited by putting an expression under an incoming (call) demand, the arity of which can be lower or higher than the depth of the resulting demand type. In contrast, a demand signature summarises a function's semantics *without* immediately specifying the incoming demand it was produced under. Despite StrSig being a newtype wrapper around DmdType, it actually encodes two things: * The threshold (i.e., minimum arity) to unleash the signature * A demand type that is sound to unleash when the minimum arity requirement is met. Here comes the subtle part: The threshold is encoded in the wrapped demand type's depth! So in mkStrictSigForArity we make sure to trim the list of argument demands to the given threshold arity. Call sites will make sure that this corresponds to the arity of the call demand that elicited the wrapped demand type. See also Note [What are demand signatures?] in GHC.Core.Opt.DmdAnal. -} -- | The depth of the wrapped 'DmdType' encodes the arity at which it is safe -- to unleash. Better construct this through 'mkStrictSigForArity'. -- See Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig] newtype StrictSig = StrictSig DmdType deriving( Eq ) instance Outputable StrictSig where ppr (StrictSig ty) = ppr ty -- Used for printing top-level strictness pragmas in interface files pprIfaceStrictSig :: StrictSig -> SDoc pprIfaceStrictSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ dmds res)) = hcat (map ppr dmds) <> ppr res -- | Turns a 'DmdType' computed for the particular 'Arity' into a 'StrictSig' -- unleashable at that arity. See Note [Understanding DmdType and StrictSig] mkStrictSigForArity :: Arity -> DmdType -> StrictSig mkStrictSigForArity arity dmd_ty@(DmdType fvs args div) | arity < dmdTypeDepth dmd_ty = StrictSig (DmdType fvs (take arity args) div) | otherwise = StrictSig (etaExpandDmdType arity dmd_ty) mkClosedStrictSig :: [Demand] -> Divergence -> StrictSig mkClosedStrictSig ds res = mkStrictSigForArity (length ds) (DmdType emptyDmdEnv ds res) splitStrictSig :: StrictSig -> ([Demand], Divergence) splitStrictSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ dmds res)) = (dmds, res) prependArgsStrictSig :: Int -> StrictSig -> StrictSig -- ^ Add extra ('topDmd') arguments to a strictness signature. -- In contrast to 'etaConvertStrictSig', this /prepends/ additional argument -- demands. This is used by FloatOut. prependArgsStrictSig new_args sig@(StrictSig dmd_ty@(DmdType env dmds res)) | new_args == 0 = sig | isTopDmdType dmd_ty = sig | new_args < 0 = pprPanic "prependArgsStrictSig: negative new_args" (ppr new_args $$ ppr sig) | otherwise = StrictSig (DmdType env dmds' res) where dmds' = replicate new_args topDmd ++ dmds etaConvertStrictSig :: Arity -> StrictSig -> StrictSig -- ^ We are expanding (\x y. e) to (\x y z. e z) or reducing from the latter to -- the former (when the Simplifier identifies a new join points, for example). -- In contrast to 'prependArgsStrictSig', this /appends/ extra arg demands if -- necessary. -- This works by looking at the 'DmdType' (which was produced under a call -- demand for the old arity) and trying to transfer as many facts as we can to -- the call demand of new arity. -- An arity increase (resulting in a stronger incoming demand) can retain much -- of the info, while an arity decrease (a weakening of the incoming demand) -- must fall back to a conservative default. etaConvertStrictSig arity (StrictSig dmd_ty) | arity < dmdTypeDepth dmd_ty = StrictSig $ decreaseArityDmdType dmd_ty | otherwise = StrictSig $ etaExpandDmdType arity dmd_ty isTopSig :: StrictSig -> Bool isTopSig (StrictSig ty) = isTopDmdType ty hasDemandEnvSig :: StrictSig -> Bool hasDemandEnvSig (StrictSig (DmdType env _ _)) = not (isEmptyVarEnv env) strictSigDmdEnv :: StrictSig -> DmdEnv strictSigDmdEnv (StrictSig (DmdType env _ _)) = env -- | True if the signature diverges or throws an exception in a saturated call. -- See Note [Dead ends]. isDeadEndSig :: StrictSig -> Bool isDeadEndSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ _ res)) = isDeadEndDiv res botSig :: StrictSig botSig = StrictSig botDmdType nopSig :: StrictSig nopSig = StrictSig nopDmdType seqStrictSig :: StrictSig -> () seqStrictSig (StrictSig ty) = seqDmdType ty dmdTransformSig :: StrictSig -> CleanDemand -> DmdType -- (dmdTransformSig fun_sig dmd) considers a call to a function whose -- signature is fun_sig, with demand dmd. We return the demand -- that the function places on its context (eg its args) dmdTransformSig (StrictSig dmd_ty@(DmdType _ arg_ds _)) cd = postProcessUnsat (peelManyCalls (length arg_ds) cd) dmd_ty -- see Note [Demands from unsaturated function calls] dmdTransformDataConSig :: Arity -> CleanDemand -> DmdType -- Same as dmdTransformSig but for a data constructor (worker), -- which has a special kind of demand transformer. -- If the constructor is saturated, we feed the demand on -- the result into the constructor arguments. dmdTransformDataConSig arity (JD { sd = str, ud = abs }) | Just str_dmds <- go_str arity str , Just abs_dmds <- go_abs arity abs = DmdType emptyDmdEnv (mkJointDmds str_dmds abs_dmds) topDiv | otherwise -- Not saturated = nopDmdType where go_str 0 dmd = splitStrProdDmd arity dmd go_str n (SCall s') = go_str (n-1) s' go_str n HyperStr = go_str (n-1) HyperStr go_str _ _ = Nothing go_abs 0 dmd = splitUseProdDmd arity dmd go_abs n (UCall One u') = go_abs (n-1) u' go_abs _ _ = Nothing dmdTransformDictSelSig :: StrictSig -> CleanDemand -> DmdType -- Like dmdTransformDataConSig, we have a special demand transformer -- for dictionary selectors. If the selector is saturated (ie has one -- argument: the dictionary), we feed the demand on the result into -- the indicated dictionary component. dmdTransformDictSelSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ [dict_dmd] _)) cd | (cd',defer_use) <- peelCallDmd cd , Just jds <- splitProdDmd_maybe dict_dmd = postProcessUnsat defer_use $ DmdType emptyDmdEnv [mkOnceUsedDmd $ mkProdDmd $ map (enhance cd') jds] topDiv | otherwise = nopDmdType -- See Note [Demand transformer for a dictionary selector] where enhance cd old | isAbsDmd old = old | otherwise = mkOnceUsedDmd cd -- This is the one! dmdTransformDictSelSig _ _ = panic "dmdTransformDictSelSig: no args" {- Note [Demand transformer for a dictionary selector] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If we evaluate (op dict-expr) under demand 'd', then we can push the demand 'd' into the appropriate field of the dictionary. What *is* the appropriate field? We just look at the strictness signature of the class op, which will be something like: U(AAASAAAAA). Then replace the 'S' by the demand 'd'. For single-method classes, which are represented by newtypes the signature of 'op' won't look like U(...), so the splitProdDmd_maybe will fail. That's fine: if we are doing strictness analysis we are also doing inlining, so we'll have inlined 'op' into a cast. So we can bale out in a conservative way, returning nopDmdType. It is (just.. #8329) possible to be running strictness analysis *without* having inlined class ops from single-method classes. Suppose you are using ghc --make; and the first module has a local -O0 flag. So you may load a class without interface pragmas, ie (currently) without an unfolding for the class ops. Now if a subsequent module in the --make sweep has a local -O flag you might do strictness analysis, but there is no inlining for the class op. This is weird, so I'm not worried about whether this optimises brilliantly; but it should not fall over. -} argsOneShots :: StrictSig -> Arity -> [[OneShotInfo]] -- See Note [Computing one-shot info] argsOneShots (StrictSig (DmdType _ arg_ds _)) n_val_args | unsaturated_call = [] | otherwise = go arg_ds where unsaturated_call = arg_ds `lengthExceeds` n_val_args go [] = [] go (arg_d : arg_ds) = argOneShots arg_d `cons` go arg_ds -- Avoid list tail like [ [], [], [] ] cons [] [] = [] cons a as = a:as -- saturatedByOneShots n C1(C1(...)) = True, -- <=> -- there are at least n nested C1(..) calls -- See Note [Demand on the worker] in GHC.Core.Opt.WorkWrap saturatedByOneShots :: Int -> Demand -> Bool saturatedByOneShots n (JD { ud = usg }) = case usg of Use _ arg_usg -> go n arg_usg _ -> False where go 0 _ = True go n (UCall One u) = go (n-1) u go _ _ = False argOneShots :: Demand -- depending on saturation -> [OneShotInfo] argOneShots (JD { ud = usg }) = case usg of Use _ arg_usg -> go arg_usg _ -> [] where go (UCall One u) = OneShotLam : go u go (UCall Many u) = NoOneShotInfo : go u go _ = [] {- Note [Computing one-shot info] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Consider a call f (\pqr. e1) (\xyz. e2) e3 where f has usage signature C1(C(C1(U))) C1(U) U Then argsOneShots returns a [[OneShotInfo]] of [[OneShot,NoOneShotInfo,OneShot], [OneShot]] The occurrence analyser propagates this one-shot infor to the binders \pqr and \xyz; see Note [Use one-shot information] in "GHC.Core.Opt.OccurAnal". -} -- | Returns true if an application to n args would diverge or throw an -- exception. See Note [Unsaturated applications] and Note [Dead ends]. appIsDeadEnd :: StrictSig -> Int -> Bool appIsDeadEnd (StrictSig (DmdType _ ds res)) n = isDeadEndDiv res && not (lengthExceeds ds n) {- Note [Unsaturated applications] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ If a function having bottom as its demand result is applied to a less number of arguments than its syntactic arity, we cannot say for sure that it is going to diverge. This is the reason why we use the function appIsDeadEnd, which, given a strictness signature and a number of arguments, says conservatively if the function is never going to return. See Note [Dead ends]. -} zapUsageEnvSig :: StrictSig -> StrictSig -- Remove the usage environment from the demand zapUsageEnvSig (StrictSig (DmdType _ ds r)) = mkClosedStrictSig ds r zapUsageDemand :: Demand -> Demand -- Remove the usage info, but not the strictness info, from the demand zapUsageDemand = kill_usage $ KillFlags { kf_abs = True , kf_used_once = True , kf_called_once = True } -- | Remove all 1* information (but not C1 information) from the demand zapUsedOnceDemand :: Demand -> Demand zapUsedOnceDemand = kill_usage $ KillFlags { kf_abs = False , kf_used_once = True , kf_called_once = False } -- | Remove all 1* information (but not C1 information) from the strictness -- signature zapUsedOnceSig :: StrictSig -> StrictSig zapUsedOnceSig (StrictSig (DmdType env ds r)) = StrictSig (DmdType env (map zapUsedOnceDemand ds) r) data KillFlags = KillFlags { kf_abs :: Bool , kf_used_once :: Bool , kf_called_once :: Bool } kill_usage :: KillFlags -> Demand -> Demand kill_usage kfs (JD {sd = s, ud = u}) = JD {sd = s, ud = zap_musg kfs u} zap_musg :: KillFlags -> ArgUse -> ArgUse zap_musg kfs Abs | kf_abs kfs = useTop | otherwise = Abs zap_musg kfs (Use c u) | kf_used_once kfs = Use Many (zap_usg kfs u) | otherwise = Use c (zap_usg kfs u) zap_usg :: KillFlags -> UseDmd -> UseDmd zap_usg kfs (UCall c u) | kf_called_once kfs = UCall Many (zap_usg kfs u) | otherwise = UCall c (zap_usg kfs u) zap_usg kfs (UProd us) = UProd (map (zap_musg kfs) us) zap_usg _ u = u -- If the argument is a used non-newtype dictionary, give it strict -- demand. Also split the product type & demand and recur in order to -- similarly strictify the argument's contained used non-newtype -- superclass dictionaries. We use the demand as our recursive measure -- to guarantee termination. strictifyDictDmd :: Type -> Demand -> Demand strictifyDictDmd ty dmd = case getUseDmd dmd of Use n _ | Just (tycon, _arg_tys, _data_con, inst_con_arg_tys) <- splitDataProductType_maybe ty, not (isNewTyCon tycon), isClassTyCon tycon -- is a non-newtype dictionary -> seqDmd `bothDmd` -- main idea: ensure it's strict case splitProdDmd_maybe dmd of -- superclass cycles should not be a problem, since the demand we are -- consuming would also have to be infinite in order for us to diverge Nothing -> dmd -- no components have interesting demand, so stop -- looking for superclass dicts Just dmds | all (not . isAbsDmd) dmds -> evalDmd -- abstract to strict w/ arbitrary component use, since this -- smells like reboxing; results in CBV boxed -- -- TODO revisit this if we ever do boxity analysis | otherwise -> case mkProdDmd $ zipWith strictifyDictDmd (map scaledThing inst_con_arg_tys) dmds of JD {sd = s,ud = a} -> JD (Str s) (Use n a) -- TODO could optimize with an aborting variant of zipWith since -- the superclass dicts are always a prefix _ -> dmd -- unused or not a dictionary strictifyDmd :: Demand -> Demand strictifyDmd dmd@(JD { sd = str }) = dmd { sd = str `bothArgStr` Str HeadStr } {- Note [HyperStr and Use demands] ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The information "HyperStr" needs to be in the strictness signature, and not in the demand signature, because we still want to know about the demand on things. Consider f (x,y) True = error (show x) f (x,y) False = x+1 The signature of f should be <S(SL),1*U(1*U(U),A)><S,1*U>m. If we were not distinguishing the uses on x and y in the True case, we could either not figure out how deeply we can unpack x, or that we do not have to pass y. ************************************************************************ * * Serialisation * * ************************************************************************ -} instance Binary StrDmd where put_ bh HyperStr = do putByte bh 0 put_ bh HeadStr = do putByte bh 1 put_ bh (SCall s) = do putByte bh 2 put_ bh s put_ bh (SProd sx) = do putByte bh 3 put_ bh sx get bh = do h <- getByte bh case h of 0 -> do return HyperStr 1 -> do return HeadStr 2 -> do s <- get bh return (SCall s) _ -> do sx <- get bh return (SProd sx) instance Binary ArgStr where put_ bh Lazy = do putByte bh 0 put_ bh (Str s) = do putByte bh 1 put_ bh s get bh = do h <- getByte bh case h of 0 -> return Lazy _ -> do s <- get bh return $ Str s instance Binary Count where put_ bh One = do putByte bh 0 put_ bh Many = do putByte bh 1 get bh = do h <- getByte bh case h of 0 -> return One _ -> return Many instance Binary ArgUse where put_ bh Abs = do putByte bh 0 put_ bh (Use c u) = do putByte bh 1 put_ bh c put_ bh u get bh = do h <- getByte bh case h of 0 -> return Abs _ -> do c <- get bh u <- get bh return $ Use c u instance Binary UseDmd where put_ bh Used = do putByte bh 0 put_ bh UHead = do putByte bh 1 put_ bh (UCall c u) = do putByte bh 2 put_ bh c put_ bh u put_ bh (UProd ux) = do putByte bh 3 put_ bh ux get bh = do h <- getByte bh case h of 0 -> return $ Used 1 -> return $ UHead 2 -> do c <- get bh u <- get bh return (UCall c u) _ -> do ux <- get bh return (UProd ux) instance (Binary s, Binary u) => Binary (JointDmd s u) where put_ bh (JD { sd = x, ud = y }) = do put_ bh x; put_ bh y get bh = do x <- get bh y <- get bh return $ JD { sd = x, ud = y } instance Binary StrictSig where put_ bh (StrictSig aa) = do put_ bh aa get bh = do aa <- get bh return (StrictSig aa) instance Binary DmdType where -- Ignore DmdEnv when spitting out the DmdType put_ bh (DmdType _ ds dr) = do put_ bh ds put_ bh dr get bh = do ds <- get bh dr <- get bh return (DmdType emptyDmdEnv ds dr) instance Binary Divergence where put_ bh Dunno = putByte bh 0 put_ bh ExnOrDiv = putByte bh 1 put_ bh Diverges = putByte bh 2 get bh = do { h <- getByte bh ; case h of 0 -> return Dunno 1 -> return ExnOrDiv _ -> return Diverges }