Wrap the given expression in the coercion safely, dropping identity coercions and coalescing nested coercions

Wraps the given expression in the source annotation, dropping the annotation if possible.

bindNonRec x r b produces either:

 let x = r in b

or:

 case r of x { _DEFAULT_ -> b }

depending on whether we have to use a case or let binding for the expression (see needsCaseBinding). It's used by the desugarer to avoid building bindings that give Core Lint a heart attack, although actually the simplifier deals with them perfectly well. See also mkCoreLet

Tests whether we have to use a case rather than let binding for this expression as per the invariants of CoreExpr: see CoreSyn

This guy constructs the value that the scrutinee must have given that you are in one particular branch of a case

Extract the default case alternative

Find the case alternative corresponding to a particular constructor: panics if no such constructor exists

Merge alternatives preserving order; alternatives in the first argument shadow ones in the second

Given:

 case (C a b x y) of
        C b x y -> ...

We want to drop the leading type argument of the scrutinee leaving the arguments to match agains the pattern

Recover the type of a well-typed Core expression. Fails when applied to the actual Type expression as it cannot really be said to have a type

Returns the type of the alternatives right hand side

Returns the type of the first alternative, which should be the same as for all alternatives

exprIsHNF returns true for expressions that are certainly already evaluated to head normal form. This is used to decide whether it's ok to change:

 case x of _ -> e

into:

 e

and to decide whether it's safe to discard a seq.

So, it does not treat variables as evaluated, unless they say they are. However, it does treat partial applications and constructor applications as values, even if their arguments are non-trivial, provided the argument type is lifted. For example, both of these are values:

 (:) (f x) (map f xs)
 map (...redex...)

because seq on such things completes immediately.

For unlifted argument types, we have to be careful:

 C (f x :: Int#)

Suppose f x diverges; then C (f x) is not a value. However this can't happen: see CoreSyn. This invariant states that arguments of unboxed type must be ok-for-speculation (or trivial).

exprOkForSpeculation returns True of an expression that is:

• Safe to evaluate even if normal order eval might not evaluate the expression at all, or
• Safe not to evaluate even if normal order would do so

It is usually called on arguments of unlifted type, but not always In particular, Simplify.rebuildCase calls it on lifted types when a 'case' is a plain seq. See the example in Note [exprOkForSpeculation: case expressions] below

Precisely, it returns True iff:

• The expression guarantees to terminate, * soon, * without raising an exception, * without causing a side effect (e.g. writing a mutable variable)

Note that if exprIsHNF e, then exprOkForSpecuation e. As an example of the considerations in this test, consider:

 let x = case y# +# 1# of { r# -> I# r# }
 in E

being translated to:

 case y# +# 1# of { r# ->
    let x = I# r#
    in E
 }

We can only do this if the y + 1 is ok for speculation: it has no side effects, and can't diverge or raise an exception.

exprOkForSpeculation returns True of an expression that is:

• Safe to evaluate even if normal order eval might not evaluate the expression at all, or
• Safe not to evaluate even if normal order would do so

It is usually called on arguments of unlifted type, but not always In particular, Simplify.rebuildCase calls it on lifted types when a 'case' is a plain seq. See the example in Note [exprOkForSpeculation: case expressions] below

Precisely, it returns True iff:

• The expression guarantees to terminate, * soon, * without raising an exception, * without causing a side effect (e.g. writing a mutable variable)

Note that if exprIsHNF e, then exprOkForSpecuation e. As an example of the considerations in this test, consider:

 let x = case y# +# 1# of { r# -> I# r# }
 in E

being translated to:

 case y# +# 1# of { r# ->
    let x = I# r#
    in E
 }

We can only do this if the y + 1 is ok for speculation: it has no side effects, and can't diverge or raise an exception.

Returns True of expressions that are too big to be compared by cheapEqExpr

Similar to exprIsHNF but includes CONLIKE functions as well as data constructors. Conlike arguments are considered interesting by the inliner.

This function is called only on *top-level* right-hand sides. Returns True if the RHS can be allocated statically in the output, with no thunks involved at all.

A measure of the size of the expressions, strictly greater than 0 It also forces the expression pretty drastically as a side effect Counts *leaves*, not internal nodes. Types and coercions are not counted.

Two expressions that hash to the same Int may be equal (but may not be) Two expressions that hash to the different Ints are definitely unequal.

The emphasis is on a crude, fast hash, rather than on high precision.

But unequal here means "not identical"; two alpha-equivalent expressions may hash to the different Ints.

We must be careful that \x.x and \y.y map to the same hash code, (at least if we want the above invariant to be true).

A cheap equality test which bales out fast! If it returns True the arguments are definitely equal, otherwise, they may or may not be equal.

See also exprIsBig

Compares expressions for equality, modulo alpha. Does not look through newtypes or predicate types Used in rule matching, and also CSE

A more efficient version of applyTypeToArg when we have several arguments. The first argument is just for debugging, and gives some context

Determines the type resulting from applying an expression to a function with the given type