base- Basic libraries
Copyright(c) The University of Glasgow 2001
LicenseBSD-style (see the file libraries/base/LICENSE)
Safe HaskellTrustworthy



Mutable references in the IO monad.



data IORef a Source #

A mutable variable in the IO monad


Instances details
Eq (IORef a) Source #

Pointer equality.

Since: base-

Instance details

Defined in GHC.IORef


(==) :: IORef a -> IORef a -> Bool Source #

(/=) :: IORef a -> IORef a -> Bool Source #

newIORef :: a -> IO (IORef a) Source #

Build a new IORef

readIORef :: IORef a -> IO a Source #

Read the value of an IORef

writeIORef :: IORef a -> a -> IO () Source #

Write a new value into an IORef

modifyIORef :: IORef a -> (a -> a) -> IO () Source #

Mutate the contents of an IORef.

Be warned that modifyIORef does not apply the function strictly. This means if the program calls modifyIORef many times, but seldom uses the value, thunks will pile up in memory resulting in a space leak. This is a common mistake made when using an IORef as a counter. For example, the following will likely produce a stack overflow:

ref <- newIORef 0
replicateM_ 1000000 $ modifyIORef ref (+1)
readIORef ref >>= print

To avoid this problem, use modifyIORef' instead.

modifyIORef' :: IORef a -> (a -> a) -> IO () Source #

Strict version of modifyIORef

Since: base-

atomicModifyIORef :: IORef a -> (a -> (a, b)) -> IO b Source #

Atomically modifies the contents of an IORef.

This function is useful for using IORef in a safe way in a multithreaded program. If you only have one IORef, then using atomicModifyIORef to access and modify it will prevent race conditions.

Extending the atomicity to multiple IORefs is problematic, so it is recommended that if you need to do anything more complicated then using MVar instead is a good idea.

atomicModifyIORef does not apply the function strictly. This is important to know even if all you are doing is replacing the value. For example, this will leak memory:

ref <- newIORef '1'
forever $ atomicModifyIORef ref (\_ -> ('2', ()))

Use atomicModifyIORef' or atomicWriteIORef to avoid this problem.

atomicModifyIORef' :: IORef a -> (a -> (a, b)) -> IO b Source #

Strict version of atomicModifyIORef. This forces both the value stored in the IORef and the value returned. The new value is installed in the IORef before the returned value is forced. So

atomicModifyIORef' ref (x -> (x+1, undefined))

will increment the IORef and then throw an exception in the calling thread.

Since: base-

atomicWriteIORef :: IORef a -> a -> IO () Source #

Variant of writeIORef with the "barrier to reordering" property that atomicModifyIORef has.

Since: base-

mkWeakIORef :: IORef a -> IO () -> IO (Weak (IORef a)) Source #

Make a Weak pointer to an IORef, using the second argument as a finalizer to run when IORef is garbage-collected

Memory Model

In a concurrent program, IORef operations may appear out-of-order to another thread, depending on the memory model of the underlying processor architecture. For example, on x86, loads can move ahead of stores, so in the following example:

import Data.IORef
import Control.Monad (unless)
import Control.Concurrent (forkIO, threadDelay)

maybePrint :: IORef Bool -> IORef Bool -> IO ()
maybePrint myRef yourRef = do
  writeIORef myRef True
  yourVal <- readIORef yourRef
  unless yourVal $ putStrLn "critical section"

main :: IO ()
main = do
  r1 <- newIORef False
  r2 <- newIORef False
  forkIO $ maybePrint r1 r2
  forkIO $ maybePrint r2 r1
  threadDelay 1000000

it is possible that the string "critical section" is printed twice, even though there is no interleaving of the operations of the two threads that allows that outcome. The memory model of x86 allows readIORef to happen before the earlier writeIORef.

The implementation is required to ensure that reordering of memory operations cannot cause type-correct code to go wrong. In particular, when inspecting the value read from an IORef, the memory writes that created that value must have occurred from the point of view of the current thread.

atomicModifyIORef acts as a barrier to reordering. Multiple atomicModifyIORef operations occur in strict program order. An atomicModifyIORef is never observed to take place ahead of any earlier (in program order) IORef operations, or after any later IORef operations.